IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobbing and workers’ health: empirical analysis for Spain


  • M. Angeles Carnero
  • Blanca Martínez
  • Roci´o Sa´nchez-Mangas


Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the effect of mobbing in workers’ health. Design/methodology/approach - Using a dataset of Spanish workers from the VI Spanish Survey on Working Conditions, the authors identify mobbed and not mobbed workers and use two different health indicators: the worker's perception that work affects health, and the presence of bad health symptoms. The authors analyze the incidence of both indicators in mobbed and not mobbed workers then estimate an econometric model to explain the probability of suffering bad health in terms of mobbing and a set of job and workers’ characteristics. The authors deal with the potential endogeneity of mobbing. Findings - It is found that, regardless of the health indicator used, the probability of suffering bad health is significantly higher among mobbed workers than among those not being mobbed. Moreover, when the health indicator is based on the worker's perception, not taking into account the endogeneity of mobbing leads to underestimation of its effect on health. Practical implications - The results can be of interest for workers, firms and policy makers in charge of designing policies related to working conditions. Given the well-known link between worker's health and productivity, the paper's results can have implications from the economic point of view. Originality/value - To the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first attempt to empirically analyze the relationship between mobbing and health at Spanish workplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Angeles Carnero & Blanca Martínez & Roci´o Sa´nchez-Mangas, 2012. "Mobbing and workers’ health: empirical analysis for Spain," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 33(3), pages 322-339, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijmpps:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:322-339

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Bassanini, Andrea & Caroli, Eve, 2014. "Is work bad for health? The role of constraint vs choice," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 1402, CEPREMAP.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12483 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Muhammad Qureshi & Mehwish Iftikhar & Saquib Janjua & Khalid Zaman & Uzma Raja & Yasir Javed, 2015. "Empirical investigation of mobbing, stress and employees’ behavior at work place: quantitatively refining a qualitative model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 93-113, January.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmpps:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:322-339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.