IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Common Agricultural Policy and the EU budget: stasis or change?

Listed author(s):
  • Alan Greer

    (University of the West of England)

Registered author(s):

    After highlighting the budgetary context and the historical trends on the funding of the CAP, this paper considers contemporary debates about its reform in the context of two ‘historic firsts’. Negotiations about the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2014-20 for the first time took place in tandem with a proposed CAP reform, within the broader context set by the financial crisis after 2008. Second, the CAP reform debates took place within the new institutional arrangements introduced in the Lisbon Treaty, which by extending the co-decision mechanism to the CAP potentially has increased the influence of the European Parliament (EP). Indeed the CAP reform dossiers were the first real test of these new arrangements and provide an insight into how the new institutional structure will work in practice. In both cases the paper highlights a continuing cleavage among member states and stakeholder interests - that maps partly onto a broader budgetary gainers/losers division - between advocates of radical reform (e.g. the UK, Sweden) and those who favour the retention of the traditional CAP (such as France, Spain and Ireland).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Europa Grande in its journal European Journal of Government and Economics.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 2 (December)
    Pages: 119-136

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:egr:ejge00:v:2:i:2:p:119-136
    Contact details of provider:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Alan Swinbank, 1999. "EU Agricultural, Agenda 2000 and the WTO Commitments," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 41-54, January.
    2. Cunha, Arlindo & Swinbank, Alan, 2011. "An Inside View of the CAP Reform Process: Explaining the MacSharry, Agenda 2000, and Fischler Reforms," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199591572.
    3. Rob Ackrill & Adrian Kay & David Harvey, 2006. "The EU Budget and the CAP: An Agenda for the Review?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 5(3), pages 20-25, December.
    4. Christilla Roederer-Rynning, 2003. "From 'Talking Shop' to 'Working Parliament'? The European Parliament and Agricultural Change," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 113-135, March.
    5. Benedetto, Giacomo, 2013. "The EU budget after Lisbon: rigidity and reduced spending?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(03), pages 345-369, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:egr:ejge00:v:2:i:2:p:119-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Europa Grande)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.