IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v169y2024ics1389934124001734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From sectoral policy change to cross-sectoral (dis)integration? A longitudinal analysis of the EU's forest and rural development policy

Author

Listed:
  • Fleckenstein, Simon

Abstract

Policy integration (PI) is critical to address cross-cutting challenges like climate change and biodiversity loss holistically. In the European Union, forests are confronting increasingly adverse climatic conditions and numerous stressors that impact their biodiversity. Political efforts to counteract these trends are mainly channeled through funding from the rural development policy as a pivotal part of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). In contrast, forest policy is hardly institutionalized at EU level. This study employs process tracing using 65 EU forest and rural development policy documents, including legal acts, preparatory documents, communications, related working documents and evaluation reports, predominantly produced over the last 25 years. By doing this, it examines the development of sectoral policy changes over time and their implications for the cross-sectoral integration of EU forest policy into rural development policy as part of agricultural policy at EU level. Results suggest that the adoption of the EU Forest Strategy for 2030 represented a provisional paradigm shift in EU forest policy. This shift is characterized by a substantial reprioritization of policy objectives, transitioning from an emphasis on economic aspects to a more climate- and biodiversity-centric approach, alterations in supported policy instruments and the introduction of various new regulatory instruments. On the other hand, the CAP and its rural development policy remain characterized by a path dependent incremental change and the latest reforms hardly reflect ambitious forest policy objectives both from budgetary and content perspectives. The findings suggest that the latest seemingly decoupled developments within both policy areas have led to an emergence of forest policy fragmentation at the EU level.

Suggested Citation

  • Fleckenstein, Simon, 2024. "From sectoral policy change to cross-sectoral (dis)integration? A longitudinal analysis of the EU's forest and rural development policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:169:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001734
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001734
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dietz, Simon & Rising, James & Stoerk, Thomas & Wagner, Gernot, 2021. "Economic impacts of tipping points in the climate system," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111807, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Arts, Bas, 2012. "Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 7-13.
    3. Sarvašová, Zuzana & Ali, Tamás & Đorđević, Ilija & Lukmine, Diana & Quiroga, Sonia & Suárez, Cristina & Hrib, Michal & Rondeux, Jacques & Mantzanas, Konstantinos T. & Franz, Kristin, 2019. "Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 - a comparative view," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 123-135.
    4. Ueli Reber & Manuel Fischer & Karin Ingold & Felix Kienast & Anna M. Hersperger & Rolf Grütter & Robin Benz, 2022. "Integrating biodiversity: a longitudinal and cross-sectoral analysis of Swiss politics," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 311-335, June.
    5. Peter Nedergaard, 2008. "The reform of the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy: an advocacy coalition explanation," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 179-195.
    6. Cornelius Senf & Allan Buras & Christian S. Zang & Anja Rammig & Rupert Seidl, 2020. "Excess forest mortality is consistently linked to drought across Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Sotirov, Metodi & Arts, Bas, 2018. "Integrated Forest Governance in Europe: An introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 960-967.
    8. Rupert Seidl & Cornelius Senf, 2024. "Changes in planned and unplanned canopy openings are linked in Europe’s forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, December.
    9. Edwards, Peter & Kleinschmit, Daniela, 2013. "Towards a European forest policy — Conflicting courses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 87-93.
    10. Carsten Daugbjerg & Alan Swinbank, 2007. "The Politics of CAP Reform: Trade Negotiations, Institutional Settings and Blame Avoidance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Baulenas, Eulàlia & Sotirov, Metodi, 2020. "Cross-sectoral policy integration at the forest and water nexus: National level instrument choices and integration drivers in the European Union," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Benjamin Cashore & Michael Howlett, 2007. "Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(3), pages 532-551, July.
    13. Haeler, Elena & Bolte, Andreas & Buchacher, Rafael & Hänninen, Harri & Jandl, Robert & Juutinen, Artti & Kuhlmey, Katharina & Kurttila, Mikko & Lidestav, Gun & Mäkipää, Raisa & Rosenkranz, Lydia & Tri, 2023. "Forest subsidy distribution in five European countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Lidong Mo & Constantin M. Zohner & Peter B. Reich & Jingjing Liang & Sergio Miguel & Gert-Jan Nabuurs & Susanne S. Renner & Johan Hoogen & Arnan Araza & Martin Herold & Leila Mirzagholi & Haozhi Ma & , 2023. "Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential," Nature, Nature, vol. 624(7990), pages 92-101, December.
    15. Alan Greer, 2013. "The Common Agricultural Policy and the EU budget: stasis or change?," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 2(2), pages 119-136, December.
    16. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    17. Brent Sohngen, 2020. "Climate Change and Forests," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 23-43, October.
    18. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i::p:1-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Simon Dietz & James Rising & Thomas Stoerk & Gernot Wagner, 2021. "Economic impacts of tipping points in the climate system," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(34), pages 2103081118-, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beland Lindahl, Karin & Söderberg, Charlotta & Lukina, Natalia & Tebenkova, Daria & Pecurul, Mireia & Pülzl, Helga & Sotirov, Metodi & Widmark, Camilla, 2023. "Clash or concert in European forests? Integration and coherence of forest ecosystem service–related national policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Elomina, Jerbelle & Pülzl, Helga, 2021. "How are forests framed? An analysis of EU forest policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    4. Brendan Moore & Andrew Jordan, 2020. "Disaggregating the dependent variable in policy feedback research: an analysis of the EU Emissions Trading System," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 291-307, June.
    5. van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2023. "Using Python for Parallelization," GTAP Technical Papers 6826, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    6. Fridén, Alexia & D'Amato, Dalia & Ekström, Hanna & Iliev, Bogomil & Nebasifu, Ayonghe & May, Wilhelm & Thomsen, Marianne & Droste, Nils, 2024. "Mapping two centuries of forest governance in Nordic countries: An open access database," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Vladimir Stojanovski, 2022. "Policy Processes in the Institutionalisation of Private Forestry in the Republic of North Macedonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Philipp Trein & Manuel Fischer & Martino Maggetti & Francesco Sarti, 2023. "Empirical research on policy integration: a review and new directions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 29-48, March.
    9. Lovrić, Marko & Torralba, Mario & Orsi, Francesco & Pettenella, Davide & Mann, Carsten & Geneletti, Davide & Plieninger, Tobias & Primmer, Eeva & Hernandez-Morcillo, Monica & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark & , 2025. "Mind the income gap: Income from wood production exceed income from providing diverse ecosystem services from Europe’s forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Ohmura, Tamaki & Creutzburg, Leonard, 2021. "Guarding the For(es)t: Sustainable economy conflicts and stakeholder preference of policy instruments," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Huwe, Vera & Henze, Levi T. & Steitz, Janek, 2023. "16 Gründe für schnelles Handeln: Kipppunkte und ihre Bedeutung für die Klimapolitik," Papers 277908, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    12. Ameur, Hachmi Ben & Han, Xuyuan & Liu, Zhenya & Peillex, Jonathan, 2022. "When did global warming start? A new baseline for carbon budgeting," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Baulenas, Eulàlia, 2021. "She’s a Rainbow: Forest and water policy and management integration in Germany, Spain and Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2023. "Using Python for Parallelization," GTAP Working Papers 6826, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    15. Häublein, Sabeth & Granzow, Tanja, 2024. "The forest-water-nexus: A narrative construction of the (ir-)relevance of cooperation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Committeri, Marco & Brüggemann, Axel & Kosterink, Patrick & Reininger, Thomas & Stevens, Luc & Vonessen, Benjamin & Zaghini, Andrea & Garrido, Isabel & Van Meensel, Lena & Strašuna, Lija & Tiililä, Ne, 2022. "The role of the IMF in addressing climate change risks," Occasional Paper Series 309, European Central Bank.
    17. Charakopoulos, Avraam & Karakasidis, Theodoros, 2022. "Backward Degree a new index for online and offline change point detection based on complex network analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    18. Ciqi Mei & Zhilin Liu, 2014. "Experiment-based policy making or conscious policy design? The case of urban housing reform in China," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(3), pages 321-337, September.
    19. Sureth Michael & Kalkuhl Matthias & Edenhofer Ottmar & Rockström Johan, 2023. "A Welfare Economic Approach to Planetary Boundaries," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 243(5), pages 477-542, October.
    20. Sebastian Sewerin & Daniel Béland & Benjamin Cashore, 2020. "Designing policy for the long term: agency, policy feedback and policy change," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 243-252, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:169:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.