IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intere/v57y2022i2d10.1007_s10272-022-1038-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Would Renationalisation and Co-financing of the Common Agricultural Policy Be Justified?

Author

Listed:
  • Ákos Kengyel

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

Abstract

During the past decades several attempts have been made to reform the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The article analyses the possible new directions of CAP implementation and financing of the CAP. It discusses whether renationalisation and co-financing of the CAP would be a beneficial approach to make the policy more efficient and to help restructuring not just the CAP expenditure but the whole EU budget. The author analyses the changes in light of the new regulatory frameworks to be implemented from 2023.

Suggested Citation

  • Ákos Kengyel, 2022. "Would Renationalisation and Co-financing of the Common Agricultural Policy Be Justified?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(2), pages 113-119, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intere:v:57:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10272-022-1038-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10272-022-1038-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10272-022-1038-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10272-022-1038-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedrich Heinemann, 2017. "The Case for Co-Financing the CAP," EconPol Working Paper 4, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Friedrich Heinemann & Stefani Weiss, 2018. "The EU Budget and Common Agricultural Policy Beyond 2020: Seven More Years of Money for Nothing?," EconPol Working Paper 17, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Alan Greer, 2013. "The Common Agricultural Policy and the EU budget: stasis or change?," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 2(2), pages 119-136, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kengyel, Ákos, 2022. "Környezeti és költségvetési szempontok szorításában. A renacionalizálás mint az EU közös agrárpolitikájának lehetséges reformiránya [Under environmental and budgetary constraints: renationalisation," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 721-738.
    2. Stępień Sebastian & Czyżewski Andrzej, 2019. "Quo vadis Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union?," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 295-309, December.
    3. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Apostolos G. Papadopoulos, 2015. "The Impact of the CAP on Agriculture and Rural Areas of EU Member States," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 4(1), pages 22-53, April.
    5. Lencsés, Enikő & Hegedűs, Szilárd & Bajkó, Norbert, 2023. "Changes In The Performance Of The Agricultural Sector In Hungary Due To The 2008 Economic Crisis And Covid-19 Pandemic," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 16(3), September.
    6. Alessandro Olper & Daniele Valenti & Valentina Raimondi & Daniele Curzi, 2023. "The EU enlargements treatment effect on agricultural policy," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 1134-1153, June.
    7. Lencsés Enikő & Bajkó Norbert & Hegedűs Szilárd, 2023. "Changes in the performance of the agricultural sector in Hungary due to the 2008 economic crisis and COVID-19 pandemic," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 16(3), pages 367-383, September.
    8. Cong, Rong-Gang & Thomsen, Marianne, 2021. "Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Laura Ciobanu, 2022. "The Shortcomings Of The Cap 2014 - 2020 From The Environmental And Climate Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 4-10, April.
    10. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2021. "Stagnierender Mehrjähriger Finanzrahmen trotz zunehmender Herausforderungen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(2), pages 82-87, February.
    11. Mangirdas Morkunas, 2022. "Measuring the Level of the Youth Informal Economy in Lithuania in 2004–2020," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Grochowska, Renata & Kosior, Katarzyna, 2016. "EU budget negotiations in the shadow of the juste retour rule," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 252637, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    H77; Q18;

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intere:v:57:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10272-022-1038-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.