IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/econwp/_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The EU Budget and Common Agricultural Policy Beyond 2020: Seven More Years of Money for Nothing?

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrich Heinemann
  • Stefani Weiss

Abstract

The European Commission’s proposals for the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are under discussion, and these cautious reform ideas have set the parameters for upcoming negotiations. CAP will continue to have a two-pillar structure of direct payments and rural development, with a seven-year budget of €365 billion. As before, almost three-quarters of the budget - €265 billion - is reserved for direct payments to farmers. However, ‘European added value’ must be urgently applied to CAP, say Friedrich Heinemann and Stefani Weiss, who have developed a series of recommendations to justify direct payments in their latest report for EconPol.

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrich Heinemann & Stefani Weiss, 2018. "The EU Budget and Common Agricultural Policy Beyond 2020: Seven More Years of Money for Nothing?," EconPol Working Paper 17, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:econwp:_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/EconPol_Working_Paper_17_2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tangermann, Stefan & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2013. "Agricultural policy in the European Union: An overview," DARE Discussion Papers 1302, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Weyerbrock, Silvia, 1998. "Reform of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy: How to reach GATT-compatibility?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 375-411, February.
    3. Weiss, Stefani & Heinemann, Friedrich & Berger, Melissa & Harendt, Christoph & Moessinger, Marc-Daniel & Schwab, Thomas, 2017. "How Europe can deliver: Optimising the division of competences among the EU and its member states," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 179116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lencsés, Enikő & Hegedűs, Szilárd & Bajkó, Norbert, 2023. "Changes In The Performance Of The Agricultural Sector In Hungary Due To The 2008 Economic Crisis And Covid-19 Pandemic," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 16(3), September.
    2. Kengyel, Ákos, 2022. "Környezeti és költségvetési szempontok szorításában. A renacionalizálás mint az EU közös agrárpolitikájának lehetséges reformiránya [Under environmental and budgetary constraints: renationalisation," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 721-738.
    3. Mangirdas Morkunas, 2022. "Measuring the Level of the Youth Informal Economy in Lithuania in 2004–2020," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Ákos Kengyel, 2022. "Would Renationalisation and Co-financing of the Common Agricultural Policy Be Justified?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(2), pages 113-119, March.
    5. Alessandro Olper & Daniele Valenti & Valentina Raimondi & Daniele Curzi, 2023. "The EU enlargements treatment effect on agricultural policy," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 1134-1153, June.
    6. Lencsés Enikő & Hegedűs Szilárd & Bajkó Norbert, 2023. "Changes in the performance of the agricultural sector in Hungary due to the 2008 economic crisis and COVID-19 pandemic," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 16(3), pages 367-383, September.
    7. Laura Ciobanu, 2022. "The Shortcomings Of The Cap 2014 - 2020 From The Environmental And Climate Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 4-10, April.
    8. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2021. "Stagnierender Mehrjähriger Finanzrahmen trotz zunehmender Herausforderungen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(2), pages 82-87, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucian Cernat & Sam Laird & Luca Monge-Roffarello & Alessandro Turrini, 2003. "The EU's Everything But Arms Initiative and the Least-developed Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-47, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Karel Janda & Jill J. McCluskey & Gordon C. Rausser, 2000. "Food Import Demand in the Czech Republic," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 22-44, January.
    3. Mora, Ricardo & San Juan, Carlos, 2004. "Geographical specialisation in Spanish agriculture before and after integration in the European Union," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 309-320, May.
    4. Davidova, Sophia & Hennessy, Thia & Thomson, Ken, 2016. "Rural Jobs and the CAP: Spitting into the Wind?," 90th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2016, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 236364, Agricultural Economics Society.
    5. Chen, Xin & Jiang, Li & Zhang, Guoliang & Meng, Lijun & Pan, Zhihua & Lun, Fei & An, Pingli, 2021. "Green-depressing cropping system: A referential land use practice for fallow to ensure a harmonious human-land relationship in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Emiliano Magrini & Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci, 2013. "Are the EU trade preferences really effective? A Generalized Propensity Score evaluation of the Southern Mediterranean Countries' case in agriculture and fishery," Working Papers 2/13, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    7. Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Wawrzyniak & Maciej Oesterreich, 2021. "The Impact of Transformational Changes on the Socio-Economic Conditions of the Rural Population. An Example of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Stępień Sebastian & Czyżewski Andrzej, 2019. "Quo vadis Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union?," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 295-309, December.
    9. Arndt, Channing & Tarp, Finn, 2003. "Efficiency and Equity Gains from Trade Policy Reform: Accounting for Marginal and Average Tariff Rates in a Gendered CGE Analysis for Mozambique," Conference papers 331149, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Bofinger, Peter & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Wieland, Volker, 2018. "Vor wichtigen wirtschaftspolitischen Weichenstellungen. Jahresgutachten 2018/19 [Setting the Right Course for Economic Policy. Annual Report 2018/19]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201819, February.
    11. Golo-Friedrich Bauermeister & Oliver Mußhoff, 2019. "Multiple switching behaviour in different display formats of multiple price lists," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 58-63, January.
    12. Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger & Alexander Krenek, 2019. "Tax-based Own Resources to Finance the EU Budget. Potential Revenues, Summary Evaluation from a Sustainability Perspective, and Implementation Aspects," WIFO Working Papers 581, WIFO.
    13. Alexandre Gohin & Herve Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël, 2006. "Tariff protection elimination and Common Agricultural Policy reform: implications of changes in methods of import demand modelling," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(13), pages 1527-1539.
    14. Emiliano Magrini & Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci, 2017. "Are EU trade preferences really effective? An impact evaluation assessment of the Southern Mediterranean Countries’ case," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 126-144, January.
    15. Lovo, Stefania & Magnani, Riccardo & Perali, Carlo Federico, 2010. "A multi-regional general equilibrium model to assess policy effects at regional level," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95059, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Weyerbrock, Silvia, 2001. "The impact of agricultural productivity increases in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe on world agricultural markets," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 237-251, December.
    17. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:36-43 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Antonella Finizia & Riccardo Magnani & Federico Perali & Paolo Polinori, 2005. "The Meg-Ismea Model for Analysis of Italy’s Agricultural Policies," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, November.
    19. Igor Fedotenkov & Rangan Gupta, 2021. "The effects of public expenditures on labour productivity in Europe," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 845-874, November.
    20. George Philippidis & Hubbard Lionel, 2003. "Varietal Utility and Patriotic Preference: The Cas of European Agriculture," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 66, pages 5-25.
    21. repec:cte:werepe:we010401 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Blesse, Sebastian & Bordignon, Massimo & Boyer, Pierre C. & Carapella, Piergiorgio & Heinemann, Friedrich & Janeba, Eckhard & Raj, Anasuya, 2019. "United we stand? Survey results on the views of French, German and Italian parliamentarians on EU and EMU reforms," ZEW policy briefs 1/2019, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:econwp:_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.