IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v125y2019icp97-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint model of freight mode choice and shipment size: A copula-based random regret minimization framework

Author

Listed:
  • Keya, Nowreen
  • Anowar, Sabreena
  • Eluru, Naveen

Abstract

In our study, we examine the joint choice of freight transportation mode and shipment size. While shipment size could be considered as an explanatory variable in modeling mode choice (or vice-versa), it is more likely that the decision of mode and shipment choice is a simultaneous process. A joint model system is developed in the form of an unordered choice model for mode and an ordered choice model for shipment size. We adopt a closed form copula-based model structure for capturing the impact of common unobserved factors affecting these two choices. Further, we explore alternatives to the traditional random utility structure in modeling mode choice. Specifically, we explore both the random utility (RU) based multinomial logit and the random regret (RR) minimization based multinomial logit (MNL) within a copula-based model. The shipment size is analyzed using ordered logit (OL) model within the copula structure. The RU and RR MNL structures are explored for several copula-based structures including Gaussian, Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern (FGM), Clayton, Gumbel, Frank and Joe. The proposed approach considers copula models with multiple copula-based dependencies within a single model. The copula-based model dependency is also allowed to vary across the data by parameterizing the dependency as a function of observed attributes. The models are estimated based on the data from 2012 U.S. Commodity Flow Survey data. The copula RRM based MNL-OL copula with Frank and Joe copula dependencies offered the best data fit indicating the strong interconnectedness between shipment mode and shipment size choice decisions. A validation exercise provides further evidence of the joint model superiority for overall sample level and freight characteristics variables specific sub-samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Keya, Nowreen & Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen, 2019. "Joint model of freight mode choice and shipment size: A copula-based random regret minimization framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 97-115.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:125:y:2019:i:c:p:97-115
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554518305337
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O. Norojono & W. Young, 2003. "A Stated preference freight mode choice model," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 1-1, April.
    2. Bhat, Chandra R. & Eluru, Naveen, 2009. "A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 749-765, August.
    3. Chakour, Vincent & Eluru, Naveen, 2016. "Examining the influence of stop level infrastructure and built environment on bus ridership in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 205-217.
    4. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    5. William P. Anderson & Lata Chatterjee & T.R. Lakshmanan, 2003. "E‐commerce, Transportation, and Economic Geography," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 415-432, September.
    6. Arunotayanun, Kriangkrai & Polak, John W., 2011. "Taste heterogeneity and market segmentation in freight shippers' mode choice behaviour," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 138-148, March.
    7. Randolph W. Hall, 1985. "Dependence between Shipment Size and Mode in Freight Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 436-444, November.
    8. Alessandro Portoghese & Erika Spissu & Chandra Bhat & Naveen Eluru & Italo Meloni, 2011. "A Copula-Based Joint Model Of Commute Mode Choice And Number Of Non-Work Stops During The Commute," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 38(3).
    9. de Jong, Gerard & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2007. "A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 950-965, November.
    10. Chorus, Caspar G. & Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2008. "A Random Regret-Minimization model of travel choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Swait, Joffre, 2001. "A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 903-928, November.
    12. Patricia Mokhtarian, 2004. "A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 257-284, August.
    13. McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
    14. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    16. Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry, 2007. "Parametric action decision trees: Incorporating continuous attribute variables into rule-based models of discrete choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 772-783, August.
    17. Jose Holguín-Veras & Ning Xu & Gerard Jong & Hedi Maurer, 2011. "An Experimental Economics Investigation of Shipper-carrier Interactions in the Choice of Mode and Shipment Size in Freight Transport," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 509-532, September.
    18. Abate, Megersa & de Jong, Gerard, 2014. "The optimal shipment size and truck size choice – The allocation of trucks across hauls," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 262-277.
    19. Abdelwahab, Walid M., 1998. "Elasticities of mode choice probabilities and market elasticities of demand: Evidence from a simultaneous mode choice/shipment-size freight transport model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 257-266, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Gabriela Malik & Danuta Kajrunajtys & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Jakub Sikora & Maciej Kuboń & Marcin Niemiec & Joanna Kapusta-Duch, 2019. "Modeling the Dependency between Extreme Prices of Selected Agricultural Products on the Derivatives Market Using the Linkage Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Pani, Agnivesh & Mishra, Sabya & Sahu, Prasanta, 2022. "Developing multi-vehicle freight trip generation models quantifying the relationship between logistics outsourcing and insourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Holguín-Veras, José & Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Campbell, Shama & González-Calderón, Carlos A. & (Cara) Wang, Xiaokun, 2021. "Freight mode choice: Results from a nationwide qualitative and quantitative research effort," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 78-120.
    4. Ahmed, Usman & Roorda, Matthew J., 2022. "Modelling carrier type and vehicle type choice of small and medium size firms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Analyzing the effect of government subsidy on shippers’ mode switching behavior in the Belt and Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 175-202.
    6. Raphael Piendl & Martin Koning & François Combes & Gernot Liedtke, 2022. "Building latent segments of goods to improve shipment size modeling: Confirmatory evidence from France," Post-Print hal-04117547, HAL.
    7. Sahu, Prasanta K. & Qureshi, Danish & Pani, Agnivesh, 2022. "Examining commercial vehicle fleet ownership decisions and the mediating role of freight generation: A structural equation modeling assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 26-33.
    8. Lu, Changxiang & Ye, Yong & Fang, Yongjun & Fang, Jiaqi, 2023. "An optimal control theory approach for freight structure path evolution post-COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Weijia (Vivian) Li & Kara M. Kockelman, 2022. "How does machine learning compare to conventional econometrics for transport data sets? A test of ML versus MLE," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 342-376, March.
    10. Günay, Gürkan, 2023. "Shipment size and vehicle choice modeling for road freight transport: A geographical perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Holguín-Veras, José & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2022. "A freight origin-destination synthesis model with mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Keya, Nowreen & Anowar, Sabreena & Bhowmik, Tanmoy & Eluru, Naveen, 2021. "A joint framework for modeling freight mode and destination choice: Application to the US commodity flow survey data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    13. Verena Maria Stockhammer & Sarah Pfoser & Karin Markvica & Jürgen Zajicek & Matthias Prandtstetter, 2021. "Behavioural Biases Distorting the Demand for Environmentally Friendly Freight Transport Modes: An Overview and Potential Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Holguín-Veras, José & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2022. "A freight origin-destination synthesis model with mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Feo-Valero, María & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Román, Concepción, 2016. "Analyzing discrepancies between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for freight transport attributes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 151-164.
    3. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    4. Günay, Gürkan, 2023. "Shipment size and vehicle choice modeling for road freight transport: A geographical perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Usman Ahmed & Matthew J. Roorda, 2023. "Joint and sequential models for freight vehicle type and shipment size choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1613-1629, October.
    6. Khakdaman, Masoud & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2020. "Shippers’ willingness to delegate modal control in freight transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Gao, Kun & Sun, Lijun & Yang, Ying & Meng, Fanyu & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "Cumulative prospect theory coupled with multi-attribute decision making for modeling travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-21.
    8. Eran Ben-Elia & Robert Ishaq & Yoram Shiftan, 2013. "“If only I had taken the other road...”: Regret, risk and reinforced learning in informed route-choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 269-293, February.
    9. Masiero, Lorenzo & Hensher, David A., 2010. "Analyzing loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity in a freight transport stated choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 349-358, June.
    10. Vega, Amaya & Feo-Valero, Maria & Espino-Espino, Raquel, 2018. "The potential impact of Brexit on Ireland's demand for shipping services to continental Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María & García-Menéndez, Leandro & Román, Concepción, 2015. "Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 252-267.
    12. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2019. "Threshold incorporating freight choice modeling for hinterland leg transportation chain of export containers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 858-872.
    13. Benjamin L. Collier & Daniel Schwartz & Howard C. Kunreuther & Erwann O. Michel‐Kerjan, 2022. "Insuring large stakes: A normative and descriptive analysis of households' flood insurance coverage," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(2), pages 273-310, June.
    14. Giselle Moraes Ramos & Winnie Daamen & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2014. "A State-of-the-Art Review: Developments in Utility Theory, Prospect Theory and Regret Theory to Investigate Travellers' Behaviour in Situations Involving Travel Time Uncertainty," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67, January.
    15. Irannezhad, Elnaz & Prato, Carlo & Hickman, Mark, 2019. "A joint hybrid model of the choices of container terminals and of dwell time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 119-133.
    16. Holguín-Veras, José & Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Campbell, Shama & González-Calderón, Carlos A. & (Cara) Wang, Xiaokun, 2021. "Freight mode choice: Results from a nationwide qualitative and quantitative research effort," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 78-120.
    17. Galarza, Francisco, 2009. "Choices under Risk in Rural Peru," MPRA Paper 17708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kaplan, Sigal & Shiftan, Yoram & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2012. "Development and estimation of a semi-compensatory model with a flexible error structure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 291-304.
    19. Roger J. Jiao & Feng Zhou & Chih-Hsing Chu, 2017. "Decision theoretic modeling of affective and cognitive needs for product experience engineering: key issues and a conceptual framework," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1755-1767, October.
    20. Qian Wu & Monique Vanerum & Anouk Agten & Andrés Christiansen & Frank Vandenabeele & Jean-Michel Rigo & Rianne Janssen, 2021. "Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 518-543, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:125:y:2019:i:c:p:97-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.