IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v160y2022ics1366554522000515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling carrier type and vehicle type choice of small and medium size firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed, Usman
  • Roorda, Matthew J.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to study freight transportation outsourcing and vehicle type choice decisions made by small and medium size firms. Carrier type and vehicle type choices are modelled independently using multinomial logit models and jointly using nested logit models. Mixed logit models are also developed for the defined structures to study the choice correlation among the choices made by the same firm, resulting in development of six different models. A commercial travel survey for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area is used to estimate the models. The models consider characteristics of the firm (employment, industry classification) and shipment (location, type). The results show significant improvement for the carrier type choice model using a mixing distribution while the vehicle type model performs slightly better using mixed logit model than using multinomial logit model structure. The nested logit model results show that firms are more likely to substitute vehicle type choices before substituting carrier type choices. The correlation of vehicle type choices is found to be highest (96%) among own-account carriers and driver-own carriers (90%) and least for the vehicles owned by a for-hire company (82%). Similar to the mixed vehicle type choice model, the mixed nested logit model also shows a slight improvement in model performance. Based on the strong correlation indicated by the nested logit model, a model reflecting the joint choice of carrier type and vehicle type is suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed, Usman & Roorda, Matthew J., 2022. "Modelling carrier type and vehicle type choice of small and medium size firms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s1366554522000515
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554522000515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keya, Nowreen & Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen, 2019. "Joint model of freight mode choice and shipment size: A copula-based random regret minimization framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 97-115.
    2. Gonzalez-Feliu, Jesus & Sánchez-Díaz, Iván, 2019. "The influence of aggregation level and category construction on estimation quality for freight trip generation models," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 134-148.
    3. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, January.
    4. Reeves Jr., Kingsley A. & Caliskan, Fethullah & Ozcan, Ozan, 2010. "Outsourcing distribution and logistics services within the automotive supplier industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 459-468, May.
    5. Khakdaman, Masoud & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2020. "Shippers’ willingness to delegate modal control in freight transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Patterson, Zachary & Ewing, Gordon O. & Haider, Murtaza, 2010. "How different is carrier choice for third party logistics companies?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 764-774, September.
    8. Sakai, Takanori & Romano Alho, André & Bhavathrathan, B.K. & Chiara, Giacomo Dalla & Gopalakrishnan, Raja & Jing, Peiyu & Hyodo, Tetsuro & Cheah, Lynette & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "SimMobility Freight: An agent-based urban freight simulator for evaluating logistics solutions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Agostino Nuzzolo & Pierluigi Coppola & Antonio Comi, 2013. "Freight Transport Modeling: Review And Future Challenges," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 40(2).
    10. Jose Holguín-Veras & Ning Xu & Gerard Jong & Hedi Maurer, 2011. "An Experimental Economics Investigation of Shipper-carrier Interactions in the Choice of Mode and Shipment Size in Freight Transport," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 509-532, September.
    11. Roorda, Matthew J. & Cavalcante, Rinaldo & McCabe, Stephanie & Kwan, Helen, 2010. "A conceptual framework for agent-based modelling of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 18-31, January.
    12. Amir Samimi & Kazuya Kawamura & Abolfazl Mohammadian, 2011. "A behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 857-869, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Ning & Wu, Yiping & Rong, Jian & Shao, Juan & Chen, Jiayuan & Zhou, Chenjing, 2023. "Analysis of truckers’ intentions in choosing freeways or parallel national and provincial roads," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Usman Ahmed & Matthew J. Roorda, 2023. "Joint and sequential models for freight vehicle type and shipment size choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1613-1629, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pani, Agnivesh & Mishra, Sabya & Sahu, Prasanta, 2022. "Developing multi-vehicle freight trip generation models quantifying the relationship between logistics outsourcing and insourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Usman Ahmed & Matthew J. Roorda, 2023. "Joint and sequential models for freight vehicle type and shipment size choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1613-1629, October.
    3. Hensher, David A. & Teye, Collins, 2019. "Commodity interaction in freight movement models for New South Wales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. David A. Hensher & Edward Wei & Wen Liu & Loan Ho & Chinh Ho, 2023. "Development of a practical aggregate spatial road freight modal demand model system for truck and commodity movements with an application of a distance-based charging regime," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 1031-1071, June.
    5. Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Holguín-Veras, José & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2022. "A freight origin-destination synthesis model with mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Mesa-Arango, Rodrigo & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2014. "Attributes driving the selection of trucking services and the quantification of the shipper’s willingness to pay," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 142-158.
    7. Günay, Gürkan, 2023. "Shipment size and vehicle choice modeling for road freight transport: A geographical perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Verena Maria Stockhammer & Sarah Pfoser & Karin Markvica & Jürgen Zajicek & Matthias Prandtstetter, 2021. "Behavioural Biases Distorting the Demand for Environmentally Friendly Freight Transport Modes: An Overview and Potential Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    9. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Sandorf, Erlend Dancke & Sobhani, Anae & Szép, Teodóra, 2021. "Obfuscation maximization-based decision-making: Theory, methodology and first empirical evidence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 28-44.
    10. Lu, Changxiang & Ye, Yong & Fang, Yongjun & Fang, Jiaqi, 2023. "An optimal control theory approach for freight structure path evolution post-COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Lu, Hui & Hess, Stephane & Daly, Andrew & Rohr, Charlene & Patruni, Bhanu & Vuk, Goran, 2021. "Using state-of-the-art models in applied work: Travellers willingness to pay for a toll tunnel in Copenhagen," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 37-52.
    12. Broberg, Thomas & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Persson, Lars, 2021. "Household preferences for load restrictions: Is there an effect of pro-environmental framing?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    13. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Granado-Díaz, Rubén, 2023. "Assessing the demand for hydrological drought insurance in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. John Buckell & Vrinda Vasavada & Sarah Wordsworth & Dean A. Regier & Matthew Quaife, 2022. "Utility maximization versus regret minimization in health choice behavior: Evidence from four datasets," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 363-381, February.
    15. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Jia, Wenjian & Jiang, Zhiqiu & Wang, Qian & Xu, Bin & Xiao, Mei, 2023. "Preferences for zero-emission vehicle attributes: Comparing early adopters with mainstream consumers in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 21-32.
    17. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    18. Carolina Silva Costa & Cira Souza Pitombo & Felipe Lobo Umbelino de Souza, 2022. "Travel Behavior before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: Mobility Changes and Transport Policies for a Sustainable Transportation System in the Post-Pandemic Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Konstantinus, Abisai & Zuidgeest, Mark & Hess, Stephane & de Jong, Gerard, 2020. "Assessing inter-urban freight mode choice preference for short-sea shipping in the Southern African Development Community region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Gatta, Valerio & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2014. "Urban freight transport and policy changes: Improving decision makers' awareness via an agent-specific approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 248-252.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s1366554522000515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.