Author
Listed:
- Bergantino, Angela Stefania
- Danielis, Romeo
- Intini, Mario
- Rotaris, Lucia
- Scorrano, Mariangela
- Xu, Chenchen
Abstract
Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing (P2PCS) has emerged as an innovative and sustainable transportation model, experiencing uneven market development across regions, yet it has not been exclusively and comprehensively reviewed until now. This study reviews 77 P2PCS publications from major academic databases, comprehensively analyzing data sources, methodologies, and key findings. A meta-analysis addresses four core themes: comparisons between P2PCS and traditional B2C car sharing to identify key advantages of P2PCS, adoption barriers of P2PCS, user characteristics and motivations, and mitigation strategies for businesses as well as public policy recommendations. Findings reveal that P2PCS offers greater operational flexibility than B2C models, serving both urban and rural areas while achieving more sustainable objectives and reducing emissions by utilizing existing vehicles. Key barriers involve trust issues, low demand, competition, and operational challenges. Users typically include younger, eco-conscious owners and cost-sensitive renters from smaller towns. Effective business strategies focus on building trust, expanding markets, and improving services through technology. Policy recommendations emphasize raising awareness, adapting regulations, fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration, and integrating P2PCS with public transport to support sustainable mobility. Moreover, the study outlines major research gaps and proposes future directions derived from both academic literature and industry insights. This review offers valuable insights for policymakers, business providers, and researchers aiming to advance sustainable transport through P2PCS.
Suggested Citation
Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Danielis, Romeo & Intini, Mario & Rotaris, Lucia & Scorrano, Mariangela & Xu, Chenchen, 2026.
"Barriers to peer-to-peer car sharing adoption and strategic pathways forward: a comprehensive literature review with meta-analysis,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000698
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104928
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.