IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/touman/v57y2016icp168-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciding not to choose: Delegation to social surrogates in tourism decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Stone, Matthew J.

Abstract

This study investigated the phenomenon of tourists delegating decisions to others. An American survey (n = 404) found a key exception to individual decision-making models. Rather than making their own decisions, respondents frequently delegated decisions, including where to go, what to do, and where to eat to others traveling with them (called “social surrogates”). A median of 25 percent of respondents delegated destination choice, and 50 percent delegated dining and activity decisions while traveling. Because individuals may not make all of their decisions, all customers may not be of equal importance to tourism marketers. Some have little to no role in choice (as they defer decisions), while others (social surrogates) may hold great influence over others (by making decisions). Thus, identifying actual decision makers, rather than just considering all tourists, may be necessary to understand tourist consumer behavior. It is proposed delegated decisions are theoretically distinct from individual or group decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stone, Matthew J., 2016. "Deciding not to choose: Delegation to social surrogates in tourism decisions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 168-179.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:touman:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:168-179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517716300899
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosen, Dennis L. & Olshavsky, Richard W., 1987. "The dual role of informational social influence: Implications for marketing management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 123-144, April.
    2. Filiatrault, Pierre & Ritchie, J R Brent, 1980. "Joint Purchasing Decisions: A Comparison of Influence Structure in Family and Couple Decision-Making Units," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(2), pages 131-140, Se.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mauri, Chiara & Nava, Consuelo R., 2021. "Do tourists experience boredom in mountain destinations?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Mengyi Lin & Fu-Yuan Li & Haibin Zhou, 2020. "A Research on the Combination of Oblique Photography and Mobile Applications Based on the Sustainable Development of Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. I-Fang Cheng & Che-Jen Su & Hsin-Hsing Liao & Nicolas Lorgnier & Anne-Marie Lebrun & Wen-Shen Yen & Yi-Fang Lan & Yingfang Huang, 2019. "Adolescents’ perceptions of mother–father dominance in family vacation decisions: a 25-society study," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(4), pages 755-778, December.
    2. Ximena Garcia-Rada & Lalin Anik & Dan Ariely, 2019. "Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 27-43, March.
    3. Olena Koval & Håvard Hansen, 2021. "It Takes a Couple to Tango: Antecedents to Collaborative Decision-Making," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Donna Dosman & Wiktor Adamowicz, 2006. "Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Data to Construct an Empirical Examination of Intrahousehold Bargaining," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 15-34, March.
    5. Preyas S. Desai & Devavrat Purohit & Bo Zhou, 2018. "Allowing Consumers to Bundle Themselves: The Profitability of Family Plans," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 953-969, November.
    6. Liu, Chuang-Chun, 2016. "Understanding player behavior in online games: The role of gender," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 265-274.
    7. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    8. Kozak, Metin, 2010. "Holiday taking decisions – The role of spouses," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 489-494.
    9. Vytautas Dikcius & Anahit Armenakyan & Sigitas Urbonavicius & Gintare Jonyniene & Justina Gineikiene, 2014. "The Influence Of Children On Family Purchasing In Lithuania And Azerbaijan," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 5(2).
    10. Kirchler, Erich & Hoelzl, Erik & Kamleitner, Bernadette, 2008. "Spending and credit use in the private household," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 519-532, April.
    11. Senecal, Sylvain & Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Nantel, Jacques, 2005. "Consumers' decision-making process and their online shopping behavior: a clickstream analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1599-1608, November.
    12. A. K. M. Abdullah Al-Amin & Tahmina Akhter & Abu Hayat Md. Saiful Islam & Hasneen Jahan & M. J. Hossain & Md. Masudul Haque Prodhan & Mohammed Mainuddin & Mac Kirby, 2019. "An intra-household analysis of farmers’ perceptions of and adaptation to climate change impacts: empirical evidence from drought prone zones of Bangladesh," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 545-565, October.
    13. Kulviwat, Songpol & Bruner II, Gordon C. & Al-Shuridah, Obaid, 2009. "The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 706-712, July.
    14. Pavleen Kaur, 2011. "Need for Parental Control and Mediation in Food Advertising to Children: A Review of Previous Research," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(3), pages 171-177.
    15. Som Aditya Juyal & M. P. Singh, 2009. "Role of Females in Family Buying Decision-Making—A Study among Females in Uttrakhand," Vision, , vol. 13(4), pages 15-23, October.
    16. Dellaert, B.G.C. & Prodigalidad, M. & Louviere, J.J., 1997. "Family members' projection of each other's preference and influence : a two-stage conjoint approach," Discussion Paper 1997-93, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    17. Smith, Gerald E. & Venkatraman, Meera P. & Dholakia, Ruby Roy, 1999. "Diagnosing the search cost effect: Waiting time and the moderating impact of prior category knowledge," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 285-314, June.
    18. White, Lesley & Johnson, Lester W., 2001. "Consensus regarding purchase influence in a professional service context: a dyadic study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 199-207, December.
    19. Krishna Das Gupta, 2010. "Dynamics of Marital Roles in Consumer Decision Making: A Study of Indian Households," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 35(2), pages 209-225, May.
    20. Christian Wibisono, 2013. "The Impact of Husband’s Perception and Value towards Family Purchase Decision Patterns," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(8), pages 522-534.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:touman:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:168-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/tourism-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.