IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v99y2015icp252-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents and consequences of innate willingness to pay for innovations: Understanding motivations and consumer preferences of prospective early adopters

Author

Listed:
  • Frank, Björn
  • Enkawa, Takao
  • Schvaneveldt, Shane J.
  • Herbas Torrico, Boris

Abstract

Managers use knowledge of innate consumer innovativeness (inherent interest in new products and services) to adapt the marketing mix to preferences of the consumers most likely to adopt new products/services. As mere interest in new products/services may not sufficiently characterize early adopters in contexts with price differences between established and innovative, new products/services, this article introduces the concept of innate willingness to pay for innovations (IWTPI). Based on data from Germany, Indonesia, Bolivia, USA, and Japan, it tests hypotheses about the antecedents to IWTPI, the moderating effects of IWTPI on the formation of customer satisfaction, and their differences between products and services. IWTPI tends to be positively influenced by income (satisfaction), financial expectations, and importance of status symbols and negatively influenced by female gender, savings orientation, and stress avoidance. These effects are moderated by cultural and economic factors. IWTPI positively moderates the effects of perceived quality (only for products, not services), competitive advantages, public brand image, and social recognition and negatively moderates the effect of perceived value on customer satisfaction. These results inform managers on how to adapt marketing strategy to early vs. late adopters in different country and industry contexts with price differences between established and innovative, new products/services.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank, Björn & Enkawa, Takao & Schvaneveldt, Shane J. & Herbas Torrico, Boris, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of innate willingness to pay for innovations: Understanding motivations and consumer preferences of prospective early adopters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 252-266.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:99:y:2015:i:c:p:252-266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162515001961
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank, Björn & Abulaiti, Gulimire & Herbas Torrico, Boris & Enkawa, Takao, 2013. "How do Asia's two most important consumer markets differ? Japanese–Chinese differences in customer satisfaction and its formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2397-2405.
    2. Gilles Laurent & Raphaelle Lambert-Pandraud, 2010. "Why Do Older Consumers Buy Older Brands? The Role of Attachment and Declining Innovativeness," Post-Print hal-00528378, HAL.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Roehrich, Gilles, 2004. "Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 671-677, June.
    5. Schaninger, Charles M & Sciglimpaglia, Donald, 1981. "The Influence of Cognitive Personality Traits and Demographics on Consumer Information Acquisition," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(2), pages 208-216, September.
    6. Bartels, Jos & Reinders, Machiel J., 2011. "Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 601-609, June.
    7. Bagwell, Laurie Simon & Bernheim, B Douglas, 1996. "Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 349-373, June.
    8. Grewal, Rajdeep & Mehta, Raj & Kardes, Frank R., 2000. "The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 233-252, June.
    9. Björn Frank & Gulimire Abulaiti & Takao Enkawa, 2012. "What characterizes Chinese consumer behavior? A cross-industry analysis of the Chinese diaspora in Japan," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 683-700, September.
    10. Sunil Venaik & Paul Brewer, 2010. "Avoiding uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(8), pages 1294-1315, October.
    11. Paul Brewer & Sunil Venaik, 2011. "Individualism–Collectivism in Hofstede and GLOBE," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(3), pages 436-445, April.
    12. Deepa Chandrasekaran & Gerard J. Tellis, 2008. "Global Takeoff of New Products: Culture, Wealth, or Vanishing Differences?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 844-860, 09-10.
    13. Frank, Björn & Herbas Torrico, Boris & Enkawa, Takao & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2014. "Affect versus Cognition in the Chain from Perceived Quality to Customer Loyalty: The Roles of Product Beliefs and Experience," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(4), pages 567-586.
    14. Choi, Jaewon & Lee, Hong Joo & Sajjad, Farhana & Lee, Habin, 2014. "The influence of national culture on the attitude towards mobile recommender systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 65-79.
    15. Wang, Chao-Hung, 2014. "How relational capital mediates the effect of corporate reputation on competitive advantage: Evidence from Taiwan high-tech industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 167-176.
    16. Štiblar Franjo & Oplotnik Žan & Vukotić Veselin, 2006. "Montenegrin Quarterly Macroeconomic Econometric Model," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(2), pages 156-171.
    17. Hoffmann, Stefan & Soyez, Katja, 2010. "A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 778-785, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimo Florio & Francesco Giffoni & Gelsomina Catalano, 2020. "Should governments fund basic science? Evidence from a willingness-to-pay experiment in five universities," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 16-33, January.
    2. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Marek Kott & Joanna Kott, 2021. "How Much Polish Consumers Know about Alternative Fuel Vehicles? Impact of Knowledge on the Willingness to Buy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Frank, Björn & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2016. "Understanding consumer reactions to product contamination risks after national disasters: The roles of knowledge, experience, and information sources," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 199-208.
    4. Zbigniew Bohdanowicz & Beata Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk & Jarosław Kowalski & Cezary Biele, 2021. "Households’ Electrical Energy Conservation and Management: An Ecological Break-Through, or the Same Old Consumption-Growth Path?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Lorente-Páramo, Ángel J. & Hernández-García, Ángel & Chaparro-Peláez, Julián, 2020. "Influence of cultural dimensions on promotional e-mail effectiveness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna, 2018. "What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3570-3581.
    7. Sabina Scarpellini & José Ángel Gimeno & Pilar Portillo-Tarragona & Eva Llera-Sastresa, 2021. "Financial Resources for the Investments in Renewable Self-Consumption in a Circular Economy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska, 2016. "What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market?," HSC Research Reports HSC/16/09, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Technology.
    9. Hietschold, Nadine & Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2020. "Who put the “NO” in Innovation? Innovation resistance leaders’ behaviors and self-identities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Lorente-Páramo, Ángel J. & Chaparro-Peláez, Julián & Hernández-García, Ángel, 2020. "How to improve e-mail click-through rates – A national culture approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Cherunya, Pauline C. & Ahlborg, Helene & Truffer, Bernhard, 2020. "Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: Why sanitation service offerings fail in informal settlements," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    12. Hugo Lucas & Ruth Carbajo & Tomoo Machiba & Evgeny Zhukov & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Improving Public Attitude towards Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Frank, Björn & Herbas-Torrico, Boris & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2021. "The AI-extended consumer: Technology, consumer, country differences in the formation of demand for AI-empowered consumer products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    14. Kamolsook, Apinya & Badir, Yuosre F. & Frank, Björn, 2019. "Consumers' switching to disruptive technology products: The roles of comparative economic value and technology type," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 328-340.
    15. Giacomo Migliore & Ralf Wagner & Felipe Schneider Cechella & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2022. "Antecedents to the Adoption of Mobile Payment in China and Italy: an Integration of UTAUT2 and Innovation Resistance Theory," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2099-2122, December.
    16. Kautish, Pradeep & Purohit, Sonal & Filieri, Raffaele & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Examining the role of consumer motivations to use voice assistants for fashion shopping: The mediating role of awe experience and eWOM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossein Nasiri Zarandi & Fereshteh Lotfizadeh, 2016. "The Influence of Cognitive Innovativeness on the Behavior and Style of Consumer Adoption: Implications for Electronic-Banking Service Adoption," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 90-103, October.
    2. Lee, Kyootai & Khan, Shaji & Mirchandani, Dinesh, 2013. "Hierarchical effects of product attributes on actualized innovativeness in the context of high-tech products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2634-2641.
    3. Filiz Bozkurt Bekoglu & Ahu Ergen & Burcu Inci, 2016. "The Impact of Attitude, Consumer Innovativeness and Interpersonal Influence on Functional Food Consumption," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 79-87, April.
    4. Boris Herbas Torrico & Björn Frank & Carlos Arandia Tavera, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility in Bolivia: meanings and consequences," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Dovile Barauskaite & Justina Gineikiene, 2017. "Nostalgia May Not Work For Everyone: The Case Of Innovative Consumers," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 8(1).
    6. Tahani Z. Aldahdouh & Petri Nokelainen & Vesa Korhonen, 2020. "Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    7. Maggioni, Isabella & Sands, Sean & Kachouie, Reza & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2019. "Shopping for well-being: The role of consumer decision-making styles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 21-32.
    8. Mackey, Jeremy D., 2022. "The effect of cultural values on the strength of the relationship between interpersonal and organizational workplace deviance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 760-771.
    9. Heidenreich, Sven & Killmer, Jan F. & Millemann, Jan A., 2022. "If at first you don't adopt - Investigating determinants of new product leapfrogging behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Schuitema, Geertje & Anable, Jillian & Skippon, Stephen & Kinnear, Neale, 2013. "The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-49.
    11. Srivastava, Saurabh & Singh, Shiwangi & Dhir, Sanjay, 2020. "Culture and International business research: A review and research agenda," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    12. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    13. Sophie Cockcroft & Saphira Rekker, 2016. "The relationship between culture and information privacy policy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(1), pages 55-72, February.
    14. Gupta, Deepika R. & Veliyath, Rajaram & George, Rejie, 2018. "Influence of national culture on IPO activity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 226-246.
    15. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Das, Manish & Shah, Dhara & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Deciphering in-store-online switching in multi-channel retailing context: Role of affective commitment to purchase situation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Robinson, Stephen Cory, 2020. "Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Frank, Björn & Herbas-Torrico, Boris & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2021. "The AI-extended consumer: Technology, consumer, country differences in the formation of demand for AI-empowered consumer products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Heidenreich, Sven & Kraemer, Tobias, 2015. "Passive innovation resistance: The curse of innovation? Investigating consequences for innovative consumer behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 134-151.
    19. Cristina López-Duarte & Marta M. Vidal-Suárez & Belén González-Díaz, 2019. "Cross-national distance and international business: an analysis of the most influential recent models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(1), pages 173-208, October.
    20. Minoo Tehrani & Andreas Rathgeber & Lawrence Fulton & Bryan Schmutz, 2021. "Sustainability & CSR: The Relationship with Hofstede Cultural Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:99:y:2015:i:c:p:252-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.