IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v183y2022ics0040162522004747.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderating role of environmental-related innovation and technologies in growth-energy utilization nexus in highest-performing eco-innovation economies

Author

Listed:
  • Lasisi, Taiwo Temitope
  • Alola, Andrew Adewale
  • Muoneke, Obumneke Bob
  • Eluwole, Kayode Kolawole

Abstract

In pursuance of SDG 7, 8 and 12, unearthing the substantive role of environmental-related innovations and technologies in mitigating the undesirable effects of fossil fuel dependence and natural resources consumption on the environment in selected highest performing eco-innovation economies unveils cutting edge policy options to aspiring eco-innovation economies. Considering the selected panel of leading eco-innovation economies (Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherland, Spain, and Sweden), this study examines the contribution of oil utilization, environmental-related technologies-innovations, and the moderating role of environmental-related technologies-innovations in energy-economic output nexus over the period 1990–2020. By employing the recently developed method of moments quantile regression approach alongside long-run estimator and Granger causality approaches as robustness, we found that oil utilization and environmental technologies spur economic growth in the countries while environmental innovations hinder output. Yet, environmental technologies further moderate the positive effect of oil utilization on economic prosperity but the disservice effect of environmental-related technological innovation is further exemplified when such innovation is applied to the oil consumption network. Moreover, while a one-way Granger causality evidence is established from environmental technologies to economic output, there is statistical evidence of a bi-directional causal relationship from oil utilization and environmental-related technological innovation to economic output. The policy relevance of this study further unearths the importance of the valuation of cost-effectiveness and energy efficiency of economic inputs such as technology-related inputs, especially during the design and manufacturing process.

Suggested Citation

  • Lasisi, Taiwo Temitope & Alola, Andrew Adewale & Muoneke, Obumneke Bob & Eluwole, Kayode Kolawole, 2022. "The moderating role of environmental-related innovation and technologies in growth-energy utilization nexus in highest-performing eco-innovation economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:183:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522004747
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522004747
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiaqi Xiao & Artūras Juodis & Yiannis Karavias & Vasilis Sarafidis & Jan Ditzen, 2023. "Improved tests for Granger noncausality in panel data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 23(1), pages 230-242, March.
    2. Khan, Zeeshan & Malik, Muhammad Yousaf & Latif, Kashmala & Jiao, Zhilun, 2020. "Heterogeneous effect of eco-innovation and human capital on renewable & non-renewable energy consumption: Disaggregate analysis for G-7 countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1993. "Making a Miracle," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 251-272, March.
    4. Westerlund, Joakim & Edgerton, David L., 2007. "A panel bootstrap cointegration test," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 185-190, December.
    5. Horbach, Jens & Rammer, Christian & Rennings, Klaus, 2012. "Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 112-122.
    6. Machado, José A.F. & Santos Silva, J.M.C., 2019. "Quantiles via moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 145-173.
    7. Peter Pedroni, 1999. "Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(S1), pages 653-670, November.
    8. Yang, Hao-Yen, 2000. "A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 309-317, June.
    9. Ahmed, Waqar & Najmi, Arsalan & Ikram, Minhaj, 2020. "Steering firm performance through innovative capabilities: A contingency approach to innovation management," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Bashiri Behmiri, Niaz & Pires Manso, José R., 2013. "How crude oil consumption impacts on economic growth of Sub-Saharan Africa?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 74-83.
    11. Amine Lahiani & Ramzi Benkraiem & Anthony Miloudi & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2019. "New Evidence on the Relationship Between Crude Oil Consumption and Economic Growth in the US: A Quantile Causality and Cointegration Approach," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 397-420, June.
    12. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    13. repec:bla:obuest:v:61:y:1999:i:0:p:653-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Peter C. B. Phillips & Bruce E. Hansen, 1990. "Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 57(1), pages 99-125.
    15. Seyi Saint Akadiri & Gizem Uzuner & Ada Chigozie Akadiri & Taiwo Temitope Lasisi, 2021. "Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the case of tourism island states: The moderating role of globalization," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2846-2858, April.
    16. Joseph A. Schumpeter & A. J. Nichol, 1934. "Robinson's Economics of Imperfect Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(2), pages 249-249.
    17. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Are Nonconvexities Important for Understanding Growth?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 97-103, May.
    18. Jahanger, Atif & Usman, Muhammad & Murshed, Muntasir & Mahmood, Haider & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2022. "The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. Maria Urbaniec & Justyna Tomala & Sergio Martinez, 2021. "Measurements and Trends in Technological Eco-Innovation: Evidence from Environment-Related Patents," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Fatai, K & Oxley, Les & Scrimgeour, F.G, 2004. "Modelling the causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in New Zealand, Australia, India, Indonesia, The Philippines and Thailand," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 431-445.
    21. Alam & Paramati, 2015. "Do oil consumption and economic growth intensify environmental degradation? Evidence from developing economies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(48), pages 5186-5203, October.
    22. Adekoya, Oluwasegun B., 2021. "Revisiting oil consumption-economic growth nexus: Resource-curse and scarcity tales," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    23. Juan David González-Ruiz & Sergio Botero-Botero & Eduardo Duque-Grisales, 2018. "Financial Eco-Innovation as a Mechanism for Fostering the Development of Sustainable Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Zhichao & Youn, Ik Joong & Alessa, Noha & Borgi, Hela, 2023. "Does natural-resource-dependency create the need of green innovation?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Esen, Ömer & Yıldırım, Durmuş Çağrı & Yıldırım, Seda, 2024. "A quantile regression approach to assess the impact of water-related environmental innovations on water stress," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Ashraf, Muhammad Zubair & Wei, Wei & Usman, Muhammad & Mushtaq, Shahid, 2024. "How can natural resource dependence, environmental-related technologies and digital trade protect the environment: Redesigning SDGs policies for sustainable environment?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Arilla-Llorente, Ramon & Gavurova, Beata & Rigelsky, Martin & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2024. "Quantifying the dynamics of relationships between eco-innovations and SDG 8," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Nosheen Fatma & Abid Haleem, 2023. "Exploring the Nexus of Eco-Innovation and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ogali, Oscar I.O. & Okoro, Emeka E. & Olafuyi, Saburi G., 2023. "Assessing consensus on nexus between natural gas consumption and economic growth," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Markus Eberhardt & Francis Teal, 2011. "Econometrics For Grumblers: A New Look At The Literature On Cross‐Country Growth Empirics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 109-155, February.
    3. Bashiri Behmiri, Niaz & Pires Manso, José R., 2012. "Crude oil conservation policy hypothesis in OECD (organisation for economic cooperation and development) countries: A multivariate panel Granger causality test," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 253-260.
    4. Skare, Marinko & Ozturk, Ilhan & Porada-Rochoń, Małgorzata & Stjepanovic, Sasa, 2024. "Energy as the new frontier: Dynamic panel data analysis revealing energy's transformative role in economic growth and technological progress," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Esseghir, Asma & Haouaoui Khouni, Leila, 2014. "Economic growth, energy consumption and sustainable development: The case of the Union for the Mediterranean countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 218-225.
    6. Herrerias, M.J. & Joyeux, R. & Girardin, E., 2013. "Short- and long-run causality between energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence across regions in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1483-1492.
    7. Ibrahim, Ridwan Lanre & Ajide, Kazeem Bello & Omokanmi, Olatunde Julius, 2021. "Non-renewable energy consumption and quality of life: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Md. Samsul Alam & Sudharshan Reddy Paramati & Muhammad Shahbaz & Mita Bhattacharya, 2015. "Dynamics of Natural Gas Consumption, Output and Trade: Empirical Evidence from the Emerging Economies," Monash Economics Working Papers 21-15, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    9. Wang, Qiang & Hu, Sailan & Ge, Yunfei & Li, Rongrong, 2023. "Impact of eco-innovation and financial efficiency on renewable energy – Evidence from OECD countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Tarik Dogru & Umit Bulut & Ercan Sirakaya-Turk, 2021. "Modeling tourism demand: Theoretical and empirical considerations for future research," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(4), pages 874-889, June.
    11. Ozcan, Burcu, 2013. "The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: A panel data analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1138-1147.
    12. Muhammad Shahbaz & Mete Feridun, 2012. "Electricity consumption and economic growth empirical evidence from Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1583-1599, August.
    13. Dierk Herzer & Holger Strulik & Sebastian Vollmer, 2012. "The long-run determinants of fertility: one century of demographic change 1900–1999," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 357-385, December.
    14. Jos Alberto Fuinhas & Ant nio Cardoso Marques & Alcino Pinto Couto, 2015. "Oil-Growth Nexus in Oil Producing Countries: Macro Panel Evidence," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 5(1), pages 148-163.
    15. Mohammad Salahuddin & Jeff Gow, 2015. "The relationship between economic growth and remittances in the presence of cross-sectional dependence," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(1), pages 207-221, January-M.
    16. Usman Mehmood & Salman Tariq & Zia Ul-Haq & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Salah Kamel & Mohamed Elnaggar & Hasan Nawaz & Ammar Hameed & Shafqat Ali, 2022. "Can Financial Institutional Deepening and Renewable Energy Consumption Lower CO 2 Emissions in G-10 Countries: Fresh Evidence from Advanced Methodologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Appiah, Michael & Li, Mingxing & Sehrish, Saba & Abaji, Emad Eddin, 2023. "Investigating the connections between innovation, natural resource extraction, and environmental pollution in OECD nations; examining the role of capital formation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Mehmet Balcilar & Ojonugwa Usman & George N. Ike, 2023. "Investing green for sustainable development without ditching economic growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 728-743, April.
    19. António Afonso & Christophe Rault, 2010. "What do we really know about fiscal sustainability in the EU? A panel data diagnostic," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 731-755, January.
    20. António Afonso & Christophe Rault, 2008. "Budgetary and External Imbalances Relationship : a Panel Data Diagnostic," Working Papers Department of Economics 2008/45, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:183:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522004747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.