IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v143y2025ics0166497225000410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the impacts of generative AI on artistic innovation routines

Author

Listed:
  • Chu, Wenyi
  • Baxter, David
  • Liu, Yang

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) is now being used in many computer-based knowledge works by various human–AI collaborations, as a major recent technological shift. However, micro-level research of GenAI impacts is rare. Moreover, whilst the creative industries are early adopters and heavy users of GenAI, there is a lack of research in this domain. To bridge these gaps, this study implemented an inductive approach to evaluate the application of GenAI in artistic innovation based on a detailed case study in a show production firm making use of company documents, interviews, and observations. The theoretical lens of routine dynamics reveals the nature of the impacts. As both a working tool and a communication facilitator, the collective application of GenAI as the working medium led to the ostensive sequence change of routines as simultaneous exploration of problems and solutions for creativity and innovation. We provide two main theoretical implications. First, individual and collective application of GenAI as both digital working tool and medium in artistic creation can improve productivity of creation and iteration. Second, such human-AI collaboration results in the routine adaptation of ostensive aspect by changing the path and interface of routine clusters and mixtures the sequential routines within creation with local events rather than systematically transforming routines.

Suggested Citation

  • Chu, Wenyi & Baxter, David & Liu, Yang, 2025. "Exploring the impacts of generative AI on artistic innovation routines," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225000410
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000410
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haefner, Naomi & Wincent, Joakim & Parida, Vinit & Gassmann, Oliver, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Brian T. Pentland & Martha S. Feldman & Markus C. Becker & Peng Liu, 2012. "Dynamics of Organizational Routines: A Generative Model," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(8), pages 1484-1508, December.
    3. Alshawaaf, Nasser & Lee, Soo Hee, 2021. "Business model innovation through digitisation in social purpose organisations: A comparative analysis of Tate Modern and Pompidou Centre," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 597-608.
    4. Burlina, Chiara & Casadei, Patrizia & Crociata, Alessandro, 2023. "Economic complexity and firm performance in the cultural and creative sector: evidence from Italian provinces," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116979, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Mariani, Marcello M. & Machado, Isa & Magrelli, Vittoria & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. D'Adderio, Luciana & Pollock, Neil, 2020. "Making routines the same: Crafting similarity and singularity in routines transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    7. Hakan Ozalp & J.P. Eggers & Franco Malerba, 2023. "Hitting reset: Industry evolution, generational technology cycles, and the dynamic value of firm experience," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1292-1327, May.
    8. Xavier Castañer & Lorenzo Campos, 2002. "The Determinants of Artistic Innovation: Bringing in the Role of Organizations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(1), pages 29-52, February.
    9. Thomas Paris & Sihem Ben Mahmoud‐jouini, 2019. "The process of creation in creative industries," Post-Print hal-02446587, HAL.
    10. Martha S. Feldman & Brian T. Pentland & Luciana D’Adderio & Nathalie Lazaric, 2016. "Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 505-513, June.
    11. Melissa E. Graebner & Anne Marie Knott & Marvin B. Lieberman & Will Mitchell, 2023. "Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question‐driven, phenomenon‐based approach to strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 3-10, January.
    12. Nicholas Berente & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo & John Leslie King, 2016. "Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA’s Enterprise Information System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 551-572, June.
    13. Bob Kijkuit & Jan Van Den Ende, 2007. "The Organizational Life of an Idea: Integrating Social Network, Creativity and Decision‐Making Perspectives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 863-882, September.
    14. Patrick Sailer & Georg Josef Loscher & Stephan Kaiser, 2024. "Coordinated Interdependence: How Patterning Governs Flexibility in a Routine Cluster," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1884-1915, July.
    15. Ramaul, Laavanya & Ritala, Paavo & Ruokonen, Mika, 2024. "Creational and conversational AI affordances: How the new breed of chatbots is revolutionizing knowledge industries," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 615-627.
    16. D'Adderio, Luciana, 2011. "Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 197-230, June.
    17. Cordasco, Carlo & Gherhes, Cristian & Brooks, Chay & Vorley, Tim, 2021. "An institutional taxonomy of adoption of innovation in the classic professions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Martha S. Feldman, 2004. "Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 295-309, June.
    19. Waldemar Kremser & Georg Schreyögg, 2016. "The Dynamics of Interrelated Routines: Introducing the Cluster Level," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 698-721, June.
    20. Gino Cattani & Simone Ferriani, 2008. "A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 824-844, December.
    21. Jeremy Aroles & Christine McLean, 2016. "Rethinking Stability and Change in the Study of Organizational Routines: Difference and Repetition in a Newspaper-Printing Factory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 535-550, June.
    22. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    23. Landoni, Paolo & Dell’era, Claudio & Frattini, Federico & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Verganti, Roberto & Manelli, Luca, 2020. "Business model innovation in cultural and creative industries: Insights from three leading mobile gaming firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    24. Fleur Deken & Paul R. Carlile & Hans Berends & Kristina Lauche, 2016. "Generating Novelty Through Interdependent Routines: A Process Model of Routine Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 659-677, June.
    25. Stéphane J. G. Girod & Richard Whittington, 2015. "Change Escalation Processes and Complex Adaptive Systems: From Incremental Reconfigurations to Discontinuous Restructuring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1520-1535, October.
    26. Rana, Nripendra P. & Pillai, Rajasshrie & Sivathanu, Brijesh & Malik, Nishtha, 2024. "Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    27. Cohen, Michael D, et al, 1996. "Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(3), pages 653-698.
    28. Martha S. Feldman, 2000. "Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 611-629, December.
    29. Peres, Renana & Schreier, Martin & Schweidel, David & Sorescu, Alina, 2023. "On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 269-275.
    30. Nora Meziani & Laure Cabantous, 2020. "Acting Intuition into Sense: How Film Crews Make Sense with Embodied Ways of Knowing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1384-1419, November.
    31. Hollis Haotian Chai & Sherry Shiqian Gao & Kitty Jieyi Chen & Duangporn Duangthip & Edward Chin Man Lo & Chun Hung Chu, 2021. "A Concise Review on Qualitative Research in Dentistry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    32. Miikka J. Lehtonen & Antti Ainamo & J Harviainen, 2020. "The four faces of creative industries: visualising the game industry ecosystem in Helsinki and Tokyo," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 1062-1087, October.
    33. Thomas Paris & Sihem Ben Mahmoud‐jouini, 2019. "The process of creation in creative industries," Post-Print hal-02315981, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martha S. Feldman & Brian T. Pentland & Luciana D’Adderio & Nathalie Lazaric, 2016. "Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 505-513, June.
    2. Dehua Gao & Aliakbar Akbaritabar, 2022. "Using agent-based modeling in routine dynamics research: a quantitative and content analysis of literature," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 521-550, February.
    3. Patrick Sailer & Georg Josef Loscher & Stephan Kaiser, 2024. "Coordinated Interdependence: How Patterning Governs Flexibility in a Routine Cluster," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1884-1915, July.
    4. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1119-1154, September.
    5. Niki A. den Nieuwenboer & João Vieira da Cunha & Linda Klebe Treviño, 2017. "Middle Managers and Corruptive Routine Translation: The Social Production of Deceptive Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 781-803, October.
    6. Anja Danner-Schröder, 2021. "Without actors, there is no action: How interpersonal interactions help to explain routine dynamics," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1913-1936, October.
    7. Yutaka Yamauchi & Takeshi Hiramoto, 2020. "Performative Achievement of Routine Recognizability: An Analysis of Order Taking Routines at Sushi Bars," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(8), pages 1610-1642, December.
    8. Gilstrap, J. Bruce & Hart, Timothy A., 2020. "How employee behaviors effect organizational change and stability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 120-131.
    9. Aura Parmentier-Cajaiba & Nathalie Lazaric & Giovany Cajaiba-Santana, 2021. "The effortful process of routines emergence: the interplay of entrepreneurial actions and artefacts," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 33-63, January.
    10. Nathalie Lazaric & Loubna Echajari & Dorota Leszczyńska, 2025. "The Multiplicity of Paths to Sustainability, Grand Challenges and Routine Changes: The Long Road for Bordeaux Winemakers," GREDEG Working Papers 2025-27, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    11. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    12. Maroun, Warren & Duboisée de Ricquebourg, Alan, 2024. "How auditors identify and report key audit matters - An organizational routines perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    13. Davies, Andrew & Frederiksen, Lars & Cacciatori, Eugenia & Hartmann, Andreas, 2018. "The long and winding road: Routine creation and replication in multi-site organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1403-1417.
    14. Guo, Jingjing & Guo, Bin & Zhou, Jianghua & Wu, Xiaobo, 2020. "How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Robert Charles Sheldon & Eric Michael Laviolette & Fabien Geuser, 2020. "Explaining the process and effects of new routine introduction with a notion of micro-level entrepreneurship," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 609-642, July.
    16. Rodrigo Canales, 2014. "Weaving Straw into Gold: Managing Organizational Tensions Between Standardization and Flexibility in Microfinance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 1-28, February.
    17. Anja Danner-Schröder & Daniel Geiger, 2016. "Unravelling the Motor of Patterning Work: Toward an Understanding of the Microlevel Dynamics of Standardization and Flexibility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 633-658, June.
    18. Linda Argote & Henrich R. Greve, 2007. "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm ---40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 337-349, June.
    19. Lisa Balzarin & Francesco Zirpoli, 2021. "How organizational identity and organizational routines affect each other through agency," Working Papers 04, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    20. Katharina Dittrich & Stéphane Guérard & David Seidl, 2016. "Talking About Routines: The Role of Reflective Talk in Routine Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 678-697, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225000410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.