IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i12p2715-2727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining regions for locality health care planning: a multidimensional approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shortt, Niamh K.
  • Moore, Adrian
  • Coombes, Mike
  • Wymer, Colin

Abstract

The increasing significance of the role of the general practitioner (GP) in the British National Health Service, evolving from a provider to purchaser and now a key player in the organisation of Primary Care Groups, suggests the need for GPs to possess more and more information about their registered population. GP catchment areas, though an essential basis for providing GPs with important information such as levels of accessibility to surgery, are rarely clearly or accurately defined. Previous approaches towards the definition of GP catchments have been confined to single regionalisation methods, such as mean distance measures, and are prone to problems of either overestimating or underestimating medical service areas. This problem is compounded by a lack of acknowledgement that the application of contrasting catchment methodologies to a common service population has the potential to yield vastly different results which can have serious implications for health care planning and resource allocation. The lack of sophistication in the definition of medical service areas calls for a new methodology to be considered. In this paper, attention is given to the adaptation of multidimensional regional analytical techniques developed outside the health domain and applied in a Regional Health Authority in Northern Ireland. The technique involves the creation of a Synthetic Data Matrix (SDM) which compares patient to GP flow (affiliation) information aggregated at the Census Enumeration District level across a number of catchment areas created using different methodologies. The SDM is then analysed using a modified version of the European Regionalisation Algorithm to create an optimal set of non-overlapping regions according to pre-defined population size and self-containment criteria. The results, a set of compact, robust and highly self-contained catchments, are extremely encouraging. The paper considers the future potential use of such a methodology for health care planning and highlights areas for further research in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Shortt, Niamh K. & Moore, Adrian & Coombes, Mike & Wymer, Colin, 2005. "Defining regions for locality health care planning: a multidimensional approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2715-2727, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:12:p:2715-2727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00546-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Wise & Robert Haining & Jingsheng Ma, 1997. "Regionalisation Tools for the Exploratory Spatial Analysis of Health Data," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis, chapter 5, pages 83-100, Springer.
    2. Seraphim Alvanides & Stan Openshaw, 1999. "Zone Design for Planning and Policy Analysis," Advances in Spatial Science, in: John Stillwell & Stan Geertman & Stan Openshaw (ed.), Geographical Information and Planning, chapter 16, pages 299-315, Springer.
    3. Joseph, Alun E. & Bantock, Peter R., 1982. "Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: A method and case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 85-90, January.
    4. Mike Coombes, 2000. "Defining Locality Boundaries with Synthetic Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(8), pages 1499-1518, August.
    5. D Martin & H C W L Williams, 1992. "Market-Area Analysis and Accessibility to Primary Health-Care Centres," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(7), pages 1009-1019, July.
    6. I Masser & P J B Brown, 1975. "Hierarchical Aggregation Procedures for Interaction Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 7(5), pages 509-523, August.
    7. S Openshaw & L Rao, 1995. "Algorithms for Reengineering 1991 Census Geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(3), pages 425-446, March.
    8. Curtis, Sarah E., 1982. "Spatial analysis of surgery locations in general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 303-313, January.
    9. Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), 1997. "Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-03499-6, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaofang Pan & Mei-Po Kwan & Lin Yang & Shunping Zhou & Zejun Zuo & Bo Wan, 2018. "Evaluating the Accessibility of Healthcare Facilities Using an Integrated Catchment Area Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Zheng, Chenyang & Wang, Shuming & Li, Ningxin & Wu, Yuanhao, 2021. "Stochastic joint homecare service and capacity planning with nested decomposition approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 203-222.
    3. Stafford, Mai & Duke-Williams, Oliver & Shelton, Nicola, 2008. "Small area inequalities in health: Are we underestimating them?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 891-899, September.
    4. Mike Coombes, 2014. "From City-region Concept to Boundaries for Governance: The English Case," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2426-2443, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Fragoso & Conceição Rego & Vladimir Bushenkov, 2016. "Clustering of Territorial Areas: A Multi-Criteria Districting Problem," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 14(2), pages 179-198, December.
    2. Juan Carlos Duque & Raúl Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2007. "Supervised Regionalization Methods: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 195-220, July.
    3. Robin Haynes & Andrew Lovett & Gisela Sünnenberg, 2003. "Potential Accessibility, Travel Time, and Consumer Choice: Geographical Variations in General Medical Practice Registrations in Eastern England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(10), pages 1733-1750, October.
    4. Maria da Conceição Rego & Rui Fragoso & Vladimir Bushenkov, 2014. "Clustering of Territorial Areas: A Multi-Criteria Districting Problem," ERSA conference papers ersa14p218, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Dongyoung Kim & Sungwon Jung & Yongwook Jeong, 2021. "Theft Prediction Model Based on Spatial Clustering to Reflect Spatial Characteristics of Adjacent Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Pratt, Matthew D. & Wright, Jim A. & Cockings, Samantha & Sterland, Iain, 2014. "Delineating retail conurbations: A rules-based algorithmic approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 667-675.
    7. Flowerdew, Robin & Manley, David J. & Sabel, Clive E., 2008. "Neighbourhood effects on health: Does it matter where you draw the boundaries?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1241-1255, March.
    8. Bruno, Giuseppe & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela, 2017. "Territorial amalgamation decisions in local government: Models and a case study from Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 61-72.
    9. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Wang, Kailai & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Examining equity in accessibility to multi-tier healthcare services across different income households using estimated travel time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-13.
    10. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.
    11. Olof Åslund & John Östh & Yves Zenou, 2010. "How important is access to jobs? Old question--improved answer," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 389-422, May.
    12. Pooler, James A., 1995. "The use of spatial separation in the measurement of transportation accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 421-427, November.
    13. Hamidreza Rabiei‐Dastjerdi & Stephen A. Matthews, 2021. "Who gets what, where, and how much? Composite index of spatial inequality for small areas in Tehran," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 191-205, February.
    14. Brigitte Waldorf, 2003. "Spatial Patterns and Processes in a Longitudinal Framework," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 269-288, July.
    15. Montero Lorenzo, José María, 2004. "El precio medio del metro cuadrado de la vivienda libre: Una aproximación metodológica desde la perspectiva de la Geoestadística," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 22, pages 1-18, Diciembre.
    16. Lin, Ting (Grace) & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Robinson, Todd P. & Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Church, Richard L. & Olaru, Doina & Tapin, John & Han, Renlong, 2014. "Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: a case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 111-120.
    17. Giannotti, Mariana & Tomasiello, Diego B. & Bittencourt, Taina A., 2022. "The bias in estimating accessibility inequalities using gravity-based metrics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Colin Jones & Mike Coombes & Neil Dunse & David Watkins & Colin Wymer, 2012. "Tiered Housing Markets and their Relationship to Labour Market Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(12), pages 2633-2650, September.
    19. J. Paul Elhorst, 2003. "Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 244-268, July.
    20. Laurent Gobillon & Harris Selod, 2007. "The Effects of Segregation and Spatial Mismatch on Unemployment : Evidence from France," Working Papers 2007-04, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:12:p:2715-2727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.