IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v74y2021ics003801212030793x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment and improvement analysis of economic production, water pollution, and sewage treatment efficiency in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Zhen
  • She, Zhiyu
  • Chiu, Yung-ho
  • Qin, Shijiong
  • Zhang, Lina

Abstract

With its rapid economic development in the last 40 years, China's environmental pollution has begun to seriously affect its citizens' lives as well as domestic business expansion. The problems of water pollution, increasing population, acceleration of urbanization, and strong GDP growth have made this critical issue increasingly more prominent. Recent related literature has mostly focused on economic production development and water pollution separately without systematically considering the relevant links between the former and sewage treatment capacity. Therefore, based on data of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2017, this paper uses a modified undesirable dynamic network Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) model to look into each province's economic production stage efficiency and sewage treatment stage efficiency. The research findings show big differences in input and output efficiencies for each region from 2011 to 2017 and a distinct mismatch between economic production stage efficiency and sewage treatment stage efficiency, with the former higher and the latter lower. Lastly, sewage treatment stage efficiency is a major drag on overall efficiency. Each province should thus follow the key indicators to improve efficiency according to local conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Zhen & She, Zhiyu & Chiu, Yung-ho & Qin, Shijiong & Zhang, Lina, 2021. "Assessment and improvement analysis of economic production, water pollution, and sewage treatment efficiency in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s003801212030793x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003801212030793X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fare, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna, 1996. "Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 65-70, January.
    2. Entezam, Hasan Farmani & Sobhani, Farzad Movahedi & Najafi, Seyed Esmaeil & Roshdi, Israfil, 2020. "A multi-component enhanced Russell measure of efficiency: With application to water supply plans," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    4. Hailiang Ma & Chenling Shi & Nan-Ting Chou, 2016. "China’s Water Utilization Efficiency: An Analysis with Environmental Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Riccioli, F. & Fratini, R. & Marone, E. & Fagarazzi, C. & Calderisi, M. & Brunialti, G., 2020. "Indicators of sustainable forest management to evaluate the socio-economic functions of coppice in Tuscany, Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Li, Wanghong & Li, Zhepeng & Liang, Liang & Cook, Wade D., 2017. "Evaluation of ecological systems and the recycling of undesirable outputs: An efficiency study of regions in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 77-86.
    7. Afzalinejad, Mohammad, 2020. "Reverse efficiency measures for environmental assessment in data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Alexi Thompson & Christopher Jeffords, 2017. "Virtual Water and an EKC for Water Pollution," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(3), pages 1061-1066, February.
    9. Cruz, Nuno Ferreira da & Carvalho, Pedro & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2013. "Disentangling the cost efficiency of jointly provided water and wastewater services," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 70-77.
    10. Cook, Wade D. & Green, Rodney H., 2004. "Multicomponent efficiency measurement and core business identification in multiplant firms: A DEA model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(3), pages 540-551, September.
    11. Rogge, Nicky & de Jaeger, Simon, 2012. "Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing municipal solid waste: A shared input DEA-model," Working Papers 2012/22, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    12. Zhang, Chenjun & Wu, Yusi & Yu, Yu, 2020. "Spatial decomposition analysis of water intensity in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Pinto, Francisco Silva & Simões, Pedro & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2017. "Raising the bar: The role of governance in performance assessments," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 38-47.
    14. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 145-156, June.
    15. Nemoto, Jiro & Goto, Mika, 1999. "Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 51-56, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kou, Po & Han, Ying & Qi, Xiaoyuan, 2022. "The operational mechanism and effectiveness of China's central environmental protection inspection: Evidence from air pollution," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Veronika Vaseková, 2022. "How do people in China perceive water? From health threat perception to environmental policy change," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 627-645, September.
    3. Ling Yang & Lin Wang, 2022. "An Improved Emergy Analysis of the Environmental and Economic Benefits of Reclaimed Water Reuse System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    3. Kao, Chiang, 2016. "Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 778-786.
    4. Wanke, Peter & Tsionas, Mike G. & Chen, Zhongfei & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio, 2020. "Dynamic network DEA and SFA models for accounting and financial indicators with an analysis of super-efficiency in stochastic frontiers: An efficiency comparison in OECD banking," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 456-468.
    5. Sin Lee & Tzu‐Han Chang & Yung‐ho Chiu, 2024. "Exploring the influence of fintech patents on operation efficiency and market efficiency in Taiwan's commercial banking sector‐meta entropy dynamic two‐stage DDF model," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 4276-4291, September.
    6. Chiu, Yung-ho & Huang, Kuei-Ying & Chang, Tzu-Han & Lin, Tai-Yu, 2021. "Efficiency assessment of coal mine use and land restoration: Considering climate change and income differences," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Zhong Fang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin & Tzu-Han Chang & Yi-Nuo Lin, 2024. "Analysis of natural disasters and energy efficiency in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 10999-11026, May.
    8. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Efficiency decomposition for general multi-stage systems in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 117-124.
    9. Chao, Shih-Liang & Yu, Ming-Miin & Hsieh, Wei-Fan, 2018. "Evaluating the efficiency of major container shipping companies: A framework of dynamic network DEA with shared inputs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 44-57.
    10. Yande Gong & Joe Zhu & Ya Chen & Wade D. Cook, 2018. "DEA as a tool for auditing: application to Chinese manufacturing industry with parallel network structures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 263(1), pages 247-269, April.
    11. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Yu, Ming-Miin, 2010. "Assessment of airport performance using the SBM-NDEA model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 440-452, December.
    13. Aparicio, Juan & Kapelko, Magdalena, 2019. "Accounting for slacks to measure dynamic inefficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 463-471.
    14. AGRELL, Per & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel, 2011. "Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management; state of the art and research directions," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011069, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    15. Fang-Rong Ren & Ze Tian & Yu-Ting Shen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Energy, CO 2 , and AQI Efficiency and Improvement of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Xianhua Tan & Danting Zheng & Yuanyuan Zhu & Sanggyun Na, 2023. "The Financing Efficiency of China’s Industrial Listed Enterprises Based on the Dynamic–Network SBM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Su‐Chuan Liao & Tai‐Yu Lin & Tzu‐Han Chang & Yung‐ho Chiu, 2024. "Non‐performance loans, operation, and recycle efficiency analysis—Dynamic Two‐stage Directional Distance Function Recycle with Assurance Regions model," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), pages 952-974, March.
    18. Soheila Seyedboveir & Sohrab Kordrostami & Behrouz Daneshian & Alireza Amirteimoori, 2017. "Cost Efficiency Measurement in Data Envelopment Analysis with Dynamic Network Structures: A Relational Model," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(05), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Mohammad Nourani & Wen‐Min Lu & Irene Wei Kiong Ting, 2020. "Vicarious warfare and dynamic efficiency of companies in the aerospace and defence industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 641-650, June.
    20. Wanke, Peter F., 2013. "Physical infrastructure and shipment consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian ports: A two-stage network-DEA approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 145-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s003801212030793x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.