IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v75y2025ics027553192500042x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leger’s most reputable companies in Canada: Do customer views influence stock returns?

Author

Listed:
  • Filbeck, Greg
  • Zhao, Xin

Abstract

Since 1998, Leger has published its “Most Reputable Companies in Canada” rankings. The survey is unique in that rankings are based on the views of customers who respond to factors that include the quality of products and services and customer service. This paper tests whether being listed in the rankings leads to enhanced performance. We find that portfolios of publicly traded Leger-ranked securities (of U.S.-based firms in the survey) produce statistically significant announcement window returns. On a long-term basis, a subset of the Canadian-based firms outperforms a matched sample on a raw and risk-adjusted returns basis. High-intensity capital firms listed in the survey outperform their counterparts overall, with results augmented when the industries of these firms are highly competitive. Like the Canadian sample, firms with higher capital intensity from more competitive industries exhibit greater accounting performance in the year following the survey release.

Suggested Citation

  • Filbeck, Greg & Zhao, Xin, 2025. "Leger’s most reputable companies in Canada: Do customer views influence stock returns?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:75:y:2025:i:c:s027553192500042x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027553192500042X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeff Anderson & Gary Smith, 2006. "A Great Company Can Be a Great Investment," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(4), pages 86-93, July.
    2. Greg Filbeck & Xin Zhao & Matthew Warnaka, 2022. "Glassdoor's best places to work internationally: Are they best for shareholders?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4350-4363, October.
    3. Preece, Dianna C. & Filbeck, Greg, 1999. "Family friendly firms: does it pay to care?," Financial Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 47-60.
    4. Greg Filbeck & Dianna Preece, 2003. ""Fortune's" Best 100 Companies to Work for in America: Do They Work for Shareholders?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5-6), pages 771-797.
    5. repec:eme:sef000:eb028743 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Eugene W. Anderson & Claes Fornell & Roland T. Rust, 1997. "Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 129-145.
    7. Meir Statman & Kenneth L. Fisher & Deniz Anginer, 2008. "Affect in a Behavioral Asset-Pricing Model," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(2), pages 20-29, March.
    8. Cullen F. Goenner, 2008. "Investing in Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work for in America," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19.
    9. Greg Filbeck & Raymond Gorman & Dianna Preece, 1997. "Fortune'S Most Admired Firms: An Investor'S Perspective," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 74-93, December.
    10. Robert Jacobson & Natalie Mizik, 2009. "The Financial Markets and Customer Satisfaction: Reexamining Possible Financial Market Mispricing of Customer Satisfaction," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 810-819, 09-10.
    11. Barber, Brad M. & Lyon, John D., 1997. "Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 341-372, March.
    12. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    13. Greg Filbeck & Raymond Gorman & Xin Zhao, 2009. "The “Best Corporate Citizens”: Are They Good for Their Shareholders?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 44(2), pages 239-262, May.
    14. O'Sullivan, Don & Hutchinson, Mark C. & O'Connell, Vincent, 2009. "Empirical evidence of the stock market's (mis)pricing of customer satisfaction," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 154-161.
    15. Greg Filbeck & Dianna Preece, 2003. "Fortune’s Best 100 Companies to Work for in America: Do They Work for Shareholders?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5‐6), pages 771-797, June.
    16. Saeed, Asif & Alnori, Faisal & Yaqoob, Gohar, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility, industry concentration, and firm performance: Evidence from emerging Asian economies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan & Titman, Sheridan, 1993. "Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(1), pages 65-91, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Greg Filbeck & Raymond Gorman & Xin Zhao, 2013. "Are the best of the best better than the rest? The effect of multiple rankings on company value," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 695-722, November.
    2. Greg Filbeck & Xin Zhao & Matthew Warnaka, 2022. "Glassdoor's best places to work internationally: Are they best for shareholders?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4350-4363, October.
    3. Greg Filbeck & Raymond Gorman & Xin Zhao, 2013. "Barron’s most respected companies," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(3), pages 623-641, September.
    4. Greg Filbeck & Raymond F. Gorman & Xin Zhao, 2010. "Identifying the best companies for leaders: does it lead to higher returns?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 19-31.
    5. Guillermo Badía & Fernando Gómez‐Bezares & Luis Ferruz, 2022. "Are investments in material corporate social responsibility issues a key driver of financial performance?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3987-4011, September.
    6. Brammer, Stephen & Brooks, Chris & Pavelin, Stephen, 2009. "The stock performance of America's 100 Best Corporate Citizens," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 1065-1080, August.
    7. Chun-Hung (Hugo) Tang & Ji-Eun Lee, 2014. "Employee satisfaction and long-run shareholder returns," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(14), pages 1167-1183, October.
    8. Kanellos Toudas & Athanasios Bellas, 2014. "Corporate Governance and its Effect on Firm Value and Stock Returns of Listed Companies on the Athens Stock Exchange," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 58-80.
    9. Daniel, Kent & Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2002. "Investor psychology in capital markets: evidence and policy implications," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 139-209, January.
    10. Kiesel, Florian & Ries, Jörg M. & Tielmann, Artur, 2017. "Reprint of “The impact of mergers and acquisitions on shareholders' wealth in the logistics service industry”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 261-277.
    11. Benzoni, Luca & Schenone, Carola, 2010. "Conflict of interest and certification in the U.S. IPO market," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 235-254, April.
    12. Su, Chen & Bangassa, Kenbata, 2011. "The impact of underwriter reputation on initial returns and long-run performance of Chinese IPOs," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 760-791.
    13. Carlos Forner & Sonia Sanabria, 2010. "Post-Earnings Announcement Drift in Spain and Behavioural Finance Models," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 775-815.
    14. David S. Lee & Alexandre Mas, 2012. "Long-Run Impacts of Unions on Firms: New Evidence from Financial Markets, 1961--1999," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(1), pages 333-378.
    15. Ivanov, Vladimir & Joseph, Kissan & Wintoki, M. Babajide, 2013. "Disentangling the market value of customer satisfaction: Evidence from market reaction to the unanticipated component of ACSI announcements," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 168-178.
    16. Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2013. "Corporate campaign contributions and abnormal stock returns after presidential elections," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 285-307, July.
    17. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    18. Cziraki, Peter & Lyandres, Evgeny & Michaely, Roni, 2021. "What do insiders know? Evidence from insider trading around share repurchases and SEOs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Olubunmi Faleye & Emery Trahan, 2011. "Labor-Friendly Corporate Practices: Is What is Good for Employees Good for Shareholders?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 1-27, June.
    20. Jeffrey Harrison & Matthew Hart & Derek Oler, 2014. "Leverage and acquisition performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 571-603, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:75:y:2025:i:c:s027553192500042x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.