IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i8s0048733325001039.html

Digital innovation strategies in the public sector

Author

Listed:
  • Guenduez, Ali Asker
  • Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif
  • Mueller, Elena Maria
  • Cinar, Emre

Abstract

Despite the increasing attention on digital innovations in the private sector, little is known about digital innovation strategies in the public sector. This knowledge gap is growing as public sector employees are increasingly embracing new digital tools and ideas. Drawing on rich qualitative data from practitioners in 25 cities across 18 countries, this study analyzes the digital innovation strategies pursued in the public sector, with specific attention placed on digital orientation and the foci of value creation activities. Extending the OECD's Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (OPSI) framework, we identify four distinct digital innovation strategies in the public sector: enhancement-oriented, anticipatory, adaptive, and persistent. Our findings reveal that enhancement-oriented and persistent strategies are the most prevalent, reflecting a strong focus on internal value creation through process optimization and long-term organizational change. In contrast, adaptive and anticipatory strategies are less common. We find a near-equal prevalence of incremental and transformational goals, indicating balanced strategic orientation. Our findings also suggest that practitioners often employ multiple strategies, reflecting the multifacetedness of driving digital innovation in the public sector. We provide valuable insights into various activities linked to the four identified innovation strategies, ending with a comprehensive discussion of our findings, conclusions, study limitations, and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Guenduez, Ali Asker & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Mueller, Elena Maria & Cinar, Emre, 2025. "Digital innovation strategies in the public sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:8:s0048733325001039
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325001039
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, Susan V. & Van Reenen, John & Zachariadis, Markos, 2017. "The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: An empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 984-1004.
    2. Haffke, Ingmar & Kalgovas, Bradley & Benlian, Alexander, 2016. "The Role of the CIO and the CDO in an Organization’s Digital Transformation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 83358, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Joseph Feller & Patrick Finnegan & Olof Nilsson, 2011. "Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 358-374, May.
    4. Denicolai, Stefano & Previtali, Pietro, 2023. "Innovation strategy and digital transformation execution in healthcare: The role of the general manager," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Kapturkiewicz, Agata, 2022. "Varieties of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A comparative study of Tokyo and Bangalore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    6. Nathalie Haug & Sorin Dan & Ines Mergel, 2024. "Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 1963-1987, July.
    7. Tavassoli, Sam & Karlsson, Charlie, 2015. "Persistence of various types of innovation analyzed and explained," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1887-1901.
    8. Rui Mu & Huanming Wang, 2022. "A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 489-511, April.
    9. Misha Kaur & Heather Buisman & Alex Bekker & Chad McCulloch, 2022. "Innovative capacity of governments: A systemic framework," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 51, OECD Publishing.
    10. Bendik Bygstad & Egil Øvrelid, 2020. "Architectural alignment of process innovation and digital infrastructure in a high-tech hospital," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 220-237, May.
    11. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    12. Martin, Ben R., 2012. "The evolution of science policy and innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1219-1239.
    13. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Ann Majchrzak, 2012. "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1398-1408, October.
    14. Nuttaneeya (Ann) Torugsa & Anthony Arundel, 2016. "Complexity of Innovation in the public sector: A workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 392-416, March.
    15. Gault, Fred, 2018. "Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 617-622.
    16. Vecchiato, Riccardo & Roveda, Claudio, 2014. "Foresight for public procurement and regional innovation policy: The case of Lombardy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 438-450.
    17. Mariani, Marcello M. & Nambisan, Satish, 2021. "Innovation Analytics and Digital Innovation Experimentation: The Rise of Research-driven Online Review Platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Audretsch, David B., 2017. "Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1681-1691.
    19. Boudreau, Kevin J. & Jeppesen, Lars Bo & Miric, Milan, 2022. "Profiting from digital innovation: Patents, copyright and performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    20. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    21. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "Conditions for complex innovations: evidence from public organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 820-843, June.
    22. Wang, Xincheng & Li, Yuan & Tian, Longwei & Hou, Ye, 2023. "Government digital initiatives and firm digital innovation: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    23. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    24. Lucas, Christopher & Nielsen, Richard A. & Roberts, Margaret E. & Stewart, Brandon M. & Storer, Alex & Tingley, Dustin, 2015. "Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 254-277, April.
    25. Marijn Janssen & David Konopnicki & Jane L. Snowdon & Adegboyega Ojo, 2017. "Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 189-195, April.
    26. Cefis, Elena & Orsenigo, Luigi, 2001. "The persistence of innovative activities: A cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1139-1158, August.
    27. Margaret E. Roberts & Brandon M. Stewart & Dustin Tingley & Christopher Lucas & Jetson Leder‐Luis & Shana Kushner Gadarian & Bethany Albertson & David G. Rand, 2014. "Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 1064-1082, October.
    28. Kaplinsky, Raphael & Kraemer-Mbula, Erika, 2022. "Innovation and uneven development: The challenge for low- and middle-income economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    29. Rainer Kattel & Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 787-801.
    30. Felix Ritchie, 2014. "Resistance to change in government: risk, inertia and incentives," Working Papers 20141412, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    31. Margaret E. Roberts & Brandon M. Stewart & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2016. "A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 988-1003, July.
    32. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    33. Emre Cinar & Paul Trott & Christopher Simms, 2019. "A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 264-290, February.
    34. Vickers, Ian & Lyon, Fergus & Sepulveda, Leandro & McMullin, Caitlin, 2017. "Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1755-1768.
    35. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Zeger Van der Wal, 2022. "Leadership and innovation: what’s the story? The relationship between leadership support level and innovation target," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1289-1311, August.
    36. Youngjin Yoo & Ola Henfridsson & Jannis Kallinikos & Robert Gregory & Gordon Burtch & Sutirtha Chatterjee & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "The Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1507-1523, December.
    37. Jiyao Chen & Richard M. Walker & Mohanbir Sawhney, 2020. "Public service innovation: a typology," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1674-1695, November.
    38. Nowacki, Caroline & Monk, Ashby, 2020. "Ambidexterity in government: The influence of different types of legitimacy on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cinar, Emre & Prodius, Oksana & Sokoly, Ivan & Ozcan, Sercan & Guenduez, Ali Asker, 2025. "The political context of public sector innovation: A critical interpretive synthesis on Ukraine," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(10).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    2. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Vivona, Roberto, 2021. "Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    3. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    4. Ilaria Mariani & Irene Bianchi, 2023. "Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Cinar, Emre & Prodius, Oksana & Sokoly, Ivan & Ozcan, Sercan & Guenduez, Ali Asker, 2025. "The political context of public sector innovation: A critical interpretive synthesis on Ukraine," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(10).
    6. Tarabichi, Hani & Schildt, Henri & Kodeih, Farah, 2025. "Public sector innovation through nested experimental spaces: Reinventing the immigrant integration system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    7. Roberto Vivona & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2023. "The costs of collaborative innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 873-899, June.
    8. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Roberto Vivona, 2021. "Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study [Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 379-396.
    10. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Public Health Innovation through Cloud Adoption: A Comparative Analysis of Drivers and Barriers in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    12. Chutima Suchitwarasan & Emre Cinar & Chris Simms & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu, 2024. "Innovation for sustainable development goals: a comparative study of the obstacles and tactics in public organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2234-2259, December.
    13. Haibo Tan & Lihua Yang & Ziteng Fan & Yingying Gao, 2025. "Beyond Singularity and Fragmentation: A Dynamic and Integrative Model for Explaining Public Sector Innovation," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(5), pages 529-539, December.
    14. Ahmad Alaassar & Anne-Laure Mention & Kateryna Kryzhanivska, 2026. "Digital innovation: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 331-377, January.
    15. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Schumacher, Kira & Fichtner, Wolf, 2021. "Topic Modeling Uncovers Shifts in Media Framing of the German Renewable Energy Act," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2(1).
    16. Zhang, Yujie & Ba, Zhichao & Mao, Jin & Li, Gang, 2025. "Quantifying the impact of digital technology on enterprise processes using LLM-based causal claim networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    17. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Xu, Chang & Hu, Jianguang & Li, Lu, 2025. "Functional industrial policy effects of the Belt and Road Initiative: evidence from digital innovation," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    19. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "Conditions for complex innovations: evidence from public organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 820-843, June.
    20. Peter Grajzl & Peter Murrell, 2021. "Characterizing a legal–intellectual culture: Bacon, Coke, and seventeenth-century England," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 15(1), pages 43-88, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:8:s0048733325001039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.