IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i10s0048733325001519.html

The political context of public sector innovation: A critical interpretive synthesis on Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Cinar, Emre
  • Prodius, Oksana
  • Sokoly, Ivan
  • Ozcan, Sercan
  • Guenduez, Ali Asker

Abstract

Innovation often sparks power struggles, redistributes resources, and challenges entrenched institutional legacies. Yet the role of power dynamics embedded in political contexts, particularly in non-Western countries, in shaping public sector innovation (PSI) has remained underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining how power dynamics at multiple levels and critical junctures have shaped PSI trajectories over time in Ukraine. Drawing on historical institutionalism and using a context-specific critical interpretive synthesis of 84 studies from 1991 to 2022, we reveal how critical junctures intensified PSI and enabled new innovation priorities. However, these moments were deeply conditioned by existing power dynamics across international, national and subnational political levels. While some innovations contributed to the redistribution of power, others were stalled or fragmented owing to path dependencies. This study makes two primary theoretical contributions: first, it reconceptualizes political context as a dynamic, multilevel arena of vertical and horizontal power contestations that shapes PSI; second, it extends PSI theory by demonstrating how critical junctures operate as temporally bounded periods of constrained agency, cumulatively shaping innovation trajectories. These insights advance our understanding of the complex interplays between political contexts, power dynamics, and temporality in PSI.

Suggested Citation

  • Cinar, Emre & Prodius, Oksana & Sokoly, Ivan & Ozcan, Sercan & Guenduez, Ali Asker, 2025. "The political context of public sector innovation: A critical interpretive synthesis on Ukraine," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(10).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:10:s0048733325001519
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325001519
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fioretos, Orfeo, 2011. "Historical Institutionalism in International Relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 367-399, April.
    2. Salge, Torsten Oliver, 2012. "The temporal trajectories of innovative search: Insights from public hospital services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 720-733.
    3. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    4. Nataliia Goncharuk & Oxana Orhiiets & Leonid Prokopenko, 2021. "Formation And Development Of The System Of Professional Training Of Public Servants In Ukraine: Organizational, Legal, And Economic Aspects," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(1).
    5. Oleksandr Karpenko & Kateryna Glubochenko, 2018. "Concept of service-oriented public policymaking in Ukrainian legislation," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 8(2), pages 585-595, June.
    6. Weng Marc Lim & Satish Kumar & Faizan Ali, 2022. "Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7-8), pages 481-513, June.
    7. Hanna Kotina & Maryna Stepura & Pavlo Kondro, 2022. "How Does Active Digital Transformation Affect The Efficiency Of Governance And The Sustainability Of Public Finance? The Ukrainian Case," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 8(1).
    8. Chesney Callens & Koen Verhoest, 2024. "Unlocking the process of collaborative innovation - Combining mechanisms of divergence and convergence," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 1849-1870, July.
    9. Emre Cinar & Christopher Simms & Paul Trott & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu, 2024. "Public sector innovation in context: A comparative study of innovation types," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 265-292, January.
    10. Dmytro Panchuk, 2019. "Effectiveness of EU Transgovernmental Cooperation in the Neighbourhood: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Twinning Projects in Ukraine," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 480-509, March.
    11. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    12. Ding Xin & Tetiana Koliada & Ganna Muzychenko, 2021. "Assessment Of The Impact Of Budget Decentralization On Sustainable Development Of Territorial Communities In Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(4).
    13. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    14. Viktor Oharenko & Iuliana Kozachenko, 2020. "State Regulation Of The Education Sector Under The Conditions Of Decentralization," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(3).
    15. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    16. Duncan Leitch, 2019. "Leaving like an Englishman: Assisting institutional reform in post‐communist Ukraine," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(1), pages 111-128, January.
    17. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2001. "A Theory of Political Transitions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 938-963, September.
    18. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Audretsch, David B., 2017. "Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1681-1691.
    19. Roberts, Cameron & Geels, Frank W., 2019. "Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 221-240.
    20. Guenduez, Ali Asker & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Mueller, Elena Maria & Cinar, Emre, 2025. "Digital innovation strategies in the public sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    21. Marta Dmytryshyn & Roman Dmytryshyn & Valentyna Yakubiv & Andriy Zagorodnyuk, 2021. "Peculiarities of Ukrainians’ Approval of Decentralization Reform," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, September.
    22. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    23. Assel Mussagulova, 2021. "Newly independent, path dependent: The impact of the Soviet past on innovation in post-Soviet states," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 87-105, April.
    24. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "Twenty challenges for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 432-450.
    25. Meissner, Dirk & Burton, Nicholas & Galvin, Peter & Sarpong, David & Bach, Norbert, 2021. "Understanding cross border innovation activities: The linkages between innovation modes, product architecture and firm boundaries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 762-769.
    26. Oleh Predmestnikov & Vitaliy Gumenyuk, 2019. "Harmonization Of Economic And Legal Mechanisms For Deepening Eu-Ukrainian Relations," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(1).
    27. Ian Scott, 2021. "Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 12-22, February.
    28. Iurii Umantsiv & Larysa Lebedeva & Anastasiia Mytrofanova, 2019. "Modern Trends In Governance Of State Ownership Relations," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(5).
    29. Shahar Hameiri, 2020. "Institutionalism beyond methodological nationalism? The new interdependence approach and the limits of historical institutionalism," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 637-657, May.
    30. Ruth Fischer†Smith, 2018. "Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non†pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(1), pages 26-38, February.
    31. Geels, Frank W., 2004. "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 897-920, September.
    32. Tetiana Stroiko & Natalia Danik & Dmytro Prokofyev, 2021. "Development Of Financial Decentralization As A Basis For Self-Sufficiency Of Territorial Communities," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(4).
    33. Iuliia Iliashenko & Fragkoulis Papagiannis & Patrizia Gazzola & Nataliia Cherkas & Daniele Grechi, 2023. "Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Organisational Propensity to Innovate in a Public-Sector Context," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(1), pages 111-156, March.
    34. Hall, Peter A. & Taylor, Rosemary C. R., 1996. "Political science and the three new institutionalisms," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    35. Blair, Harry, 2000. "Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 21-39, January.
    36. Emre Cinar & Paul Trott & Christopher Simms, 2019. "A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 264-290, February.
    37. Givi Bedianashvili & Yuriy B. Ivanov & Tetiana V. Paientko, 2019. "Tax Reforms in Ukraine and Georgia: Changing Priorities," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 5(2), pages 107-128.
    38. Denys Zapysnyy, 2016. "Decentralisation And Local Self-Government Development As Key Issues Of Public Administration Reform In Ukraine: Current State And New Objectives To Be Attended," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 2(3).
    39. Aleksandr Kud, 2023. "Decentralized Information Platforms in Public Governance: Reconstruction of the Modern Democracy or Comfort Blinding?," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 195-221, February.
    40. Mats Fred & Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren, 2024. "Productive resistance in public sector innovation – introducing social impact bonds in Swedish local government," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 793-810, March.
    41. Jiyao Chen & Richard M. Walker & Mohanbir Sawhney, 2020. "Public service innovation: a typology," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1674-1695, November.
    42. Lyudmila Pronko & Tatyana Kolesnik & Oksana Samborska, 2018. "Activities Of United Territorial Communities As A Body Of Local Government In The Conditions Of Power Decentralization In Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(2).
    43. Emre Cinar & Paul Trott & Christopher Simms, 2021. "An international exploration of barriers and tactics in the public sector innovation process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 326-353, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    2. Chutima Suchitwarasan & Emre Cinar & Chris Simms & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu, 2024. "Innovation for sustainable development goals: a comparative study of the obstacles and tactics in public organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2234-2259, December.
    3. Guenduez, Ali Asker & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Mueller, Elena Maria & Cinar, Emre, 2025. "Digital innovation strategies in the public sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    4. Haibo Tan & Lihua Yang & Ziteng Fan & Yingying Gao, 2025. "Beyond Singularity and Fragmentation: A Dynamic and Integrative Model for Explaining Public Sector Innovation," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(5), pages 529-539, December.
    5. André Sorensen & Anna-Katharina Brenner, 2021. "Cities, Urban Property Systems, and Sustainability Transitions: Contested Processes of Institutional Change and the Regulation of Urban Property Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    7. Tarabichi, Hani & Schildt, Henri & Kodeih, Farah, 2025. "Public sector innovation through nested experimental spaces: Reinventing the immigrant integration system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    8. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Vivona, Roberto, 2021. "Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    9. Roberts, Cameron & Geels, Frank W., 2019. "Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 221-240.
    10. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Public Health Innovation through Cloud Adoption: A Comparative Analysis of Drivers and Barriers in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Ilaria Mariani & Irene Bianchi, 2023. "Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Hanrieder, Tine, 2015. "The path-dependent design of international organizations: Federalism in the World Health Organization," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 215-239.
    13. Geels, Frank W. & Ayoub, Martina, 2025. "Policy feedbacks and socio-technical feedbacks in accelerated low-carbon transitions: An integrated conceptual framework illustrated with case studies of lighting and smart meters," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    14. Roberto Vivona & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Emre Cinar, 2026. "Reverse knowledge spillover theory of public sector entrepreneurship," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 481-506, February.
    15. Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna & Anantharama, Nandini & Kallies, Anne, 2021. "Electricity market transitions in Australia: Evidence using model-based clustering," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2019. "Towards a servitization of innovation networks: from traditional innovation networks to public service innovation networks for social innovation," Post-Print halshs-03177975, HAL.
    17. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    18. Anand Menon, 2011. "Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 83-100, January.
    19. Roberto Vivona & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2023. "The costs of collaborative innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 873-899, June.
    20. Edmondson, Duncan L. & Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S., 2019. "The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:10:s0048733325001519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.