IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-07422022819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Active Digital Transformation Affect The Efficiency Of Governance And The Sustainability Of Public Finance? The Ukrainian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Kotina

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine)

  • Maryna Stepura

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine)

  • Pavlo Kondro

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine)

Abstract

The challenges of the digital economy are leading to radical changes in public governance, creating conditions for convenient and prompt access to public services and public information. Moreover, the pandemic has caused drastic changes in the use of digital public service – it has become a necessity. Ukraine has significant prerequisites for the development and effective transformation of public administration to a higher technological level. Furthermore, during the time of crisis (2013-2014, 2020-2021), the government priorities were shifted to support digital transformations to improve the effectiveness of public administration and ensure the sustainability of public finance. The purpose of the paper is to investigate and assess a correspondence between efficiency of governance and sustainability of public finance based on digital transformations under the Ukrainian approach. The main scientific question was: How does the active digital transformation in public governance affect the sustainability of public finance in Ukraine? Methodology. Seeking the solution, own methodological developments were used; correlation analysis of main indicators of government effectiveness and sustainability of public finance was estimated. To assess the impact of digitalization on public governance efficiency, Ukrainian governance practices over the past 13 years were analyzed, expressed by indicators of governance effectiveness, through the introduction of digital technologies. Results. Based on empirical research, it has been found that due to several limitations, a strong direct relationship between active digital transformation and the sustainability of public finances (debt security) has not been identified. But at the same time, significant progress has been made in efficiency of public governance through the implementation of costly but effective digital change. This correspondence is especially noticeable during the crisis caused by the pandemic (2020-2021), during which the involvement of citizens in digital services is very high. Practical implications and value/originality. The convergence of synergies between key aspects – public governance, digitalization, finance, and security – has great potential for relevant solutions that provide a broader view of sustainable development issues. It can be noted that this issue is extremely relevant for further research in the field of public administration and finance in the context of sustainable development of the digital economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Kotina & Maryna Stepura & Pavlo Kondro, 2022. "How Does Active Digital Transformation Affect The Efficiency Of Governance And The Sustainability Of Public Finance? The Ukrainian Case," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 8(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2022:8:1:9
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-1-75-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/1683/1701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/1683
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-1-75-82?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byrd, William & Guimbert, Stephane, 2009. "Public Finance, Security, and Development: A Framework and an Application to Afghanistan," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4806, The World Bank.
    2. Yulya Danshina & Igor Britchenko, 2017. "Adaptation Of Domestic State Governance To International Governance Models," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 3(5).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreea-Florentina Crăciun & Alexandra-Mădălina Țăran & Grațiela Georgiana Noja & Marilen Gabriel Pirtea & Raluca-Ioana Răcătăian, 2023. "Advanced Modelling of the Interplay between Public Governance and Digital Transformation: New Empirical Evidence from Structural Equation Modelling and Gaussian and Mixed-Markov Graphical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karimi, Abdul Matin, 2020. "Moving Away from Foreign Aid: A Case Study of Afghanistan," MPRA Paper 105524, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Jan 2021.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    governance efficiency; government effectiveness; public finance; sustainability; debt security; government spending; e-government development; e-participation; digital transformation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E61 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
    • E65 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Studies of Particular Policy Episodes
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2022:8:1:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.