IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v275y2024ics0925527324001981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking advantage of the fire: Does firm performance feedback have a supply chain contagion effect?

Author

Listed:
  • Jian, Jianhui
  • Hu, Dan
  • Tang, Zimeng
  • Xing, Jingyan

Abstract

The increased interconnection among supply chain participants brought about by globalization has made supply chain management more crucial than ever for gaining a competitive advantage. We examine how supply chain participants respond to feedback on firm performance, with a focus on the effect of contagion on bargaining power. When a company's performance is below expectations, suppliers and customers tend to increase their bargaining power and potentially take actions to safeguard their interests. This is attributed to the decline in the focal company's product market power, resulting from negative performance feedback. Contrarily, positive performance feedback does not cause significant changes in the bargaining power of supply chain firms. Moreover, we explore the role of other stakeholders, such as creditors and investors, in influencing supply chain negotiations. The distrust of other stakeholders leads to the further improvement of the bargaining power of supply chain companies. We analyze the motivation of supply chain stakeholders to improve their bargaining power under performance feedback and develop a complete causal chain and solution on how to enhance future performance prediction to lessen the increase in bargaining power of the supply chain. This paper is both a valuable contribution to the body of knowledge on the financial impacts of business stakeholder decision-making and a cautionary tale for companies that urgently need to cluster their supply chain activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian, Jianhui & Hu, Dan & Tang, Zimeng & Xing, Jingyan, 2024. "Taking advantage of the fire: Does firm performance feedback have a supply chain contagion effect?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:275:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324001981
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324001981
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jin, 2012. "Do firms' relationships with principal customers/suppliers affect shareholders' income?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 860-878.
    2. Malcolm Baker & Jeremy C. Stein & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2003. "When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(3), pages 969-1005.
    3. Huang, Henry He & Lobo, Gerald J. & Wang, Chong & Xie, Hong, 2016. "Customer concentration and corporate tax avoidance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 184-200.
    4. Tran, Tat Thanh & Zikos, Vasileios, 2017. "R&D networks among suppliers and manufacturers," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 151-161.
    5. Choi, Jaeho & Rhee, Mooweon & Kim, Young-Choon, 2019. "Performance feedback and problemistic search: The moderating effects of managerial and board outsiderness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 21-33.
    6. Lv, David Diwei & Chen, Weihong & Zhu, Hang & Lan, Hailin, 2019. "How does inconsistent negative performance feedback affect the R&D investments of firms? A study of publicly listed firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 151-162.
    7. ManMohan S. Sodhi, 2015. "Conceptualizing Social Responsibility in Operations Via Stakeholder Resource-Based View," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1375-1389, September.
    8. Benton, W.C. & Prahinski, Carol & Fan, Ying, 2020. "The influence of supplier development programs on supplier performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    9. Choi, Young Rok & Zahra, Shaker A. & Yoshikawa, Toru & Han, Bong H., 2015. "Family ownership and R&D investment: The role of growth opportunities and business group membership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1053-1061.
    10. Sakaki, Hamid & Jory, Surendranath Rakesh, 2019. "Institutional investors' ownership stability and firms' innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 10-22.
    11. John Joseph & Vibha Gaba, 2015. "The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 1960-1978, December.
    12. Nicolae Gârleanu & Stavros Panageas & Jianfeng Yu, 2015. "Financial Entanglement: A Theory of Incomplete Integration, Leverage, Crashes, and Contagion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(7), pages 1979-2010, July.
    13. Pasi Kuusela & Thomas Keil & Markku Maula, 2017. "Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, slack resources, and resource-consuming vs. resource-freeing organizational change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1101-1120, May.
    14. Renata P. Brito & Priscila L. S. Miguel, 2017. "Power, Governance, and Value in Collaboration: Differences between Buyer and Supplier Perspectives," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 61-87, April.
    15. John C. Driscoll & Aart C. Kraay, 1998. "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 80(4), pages 549-560, November.
    16. Vinit M. Desai, 2008. "Constrained Growth: How Experience, Legitimacy, and Age Influence Risk Taking in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 594-608, August.
    17. Elizabeth N. K. Lim & Brian T. McCann, 2014. "Performance Feedback and Firm Risk Taking: The Moderating Effects of CEO and Outside Director Stock Options," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 262-282, February.
    18. Itzkowitz, Jennifer, 2013. "Customers and cash: How relationships affect suppliers' cash holdings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 159-180.
    19. Campello, Murillo & Gao, Janet, 2017. "Customer concentration and loan contract terms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 108-136.
    20. Vibha Gaba & John Joseph, 2013. "Corporate Structure and Performance Feedback: Aspirations and Adaptation in M-Form Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1102-1119, August.
    21. Christopher S. Tuggle & David G. Sirmon & Christopher R. Reutzel & Leonard Bierman, 2010. "Commanding board of director attention: investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members' attention to monitoring," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(9), pages 946-968, September.
    22. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    23. Jae C. Jung & Pratima Bansal, 2009. "How Firm Performance Affects Internationalization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 709-732, December.
    24. Yang, Qian & Zhao, Xiande & Yeung, Hoi Yan Jeff & Liu, Yanping, 2016. "Improving logistics outsourcing performance through transactional and relational mechanisms under transaction uncertainties: Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 12-23.
    25. Chen, Lujie & Zhao, Xiande & Tang, Ou & Price, Lydia & Zhang, Shanshan & Zhu, Wenwen, 2017. "Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 73-87.
    26. Li, Siyu & Zhao, Xiande & Huo, Baofeng, 2018. "Supply chain coordination and innovativeness: A social contagion and learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 47-61.
    27. Avi Fiegenbaum & Howard Thomas, 1995. "Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(6), pages 461-476.
    28. Jerayr (John) Haleblian & Gerry McNamara & Kalin Kolev & Bernadine J. Dykes, 2012. "Exploring firm characteristics that differentiate leaders from followers in industry merger waves: a competitive dynamics perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9), pages 1037-1052, September.
    29. Jared Harris & Philip Bromiley, 2007. "Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 350-367, June.
    30. Lii, Peirchyi & Kuo, Fang-I, 2016. "Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-155.
    31. John Joseph & Ronald Klingebiel & Alex James Wilson, 2016. "Organizational Structure and Performance Feedback: Centralization, Aspirations, and Termination Decisions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1065-1083, October.
    32. Zhang, Xindong & Zou, Meifeng & Liu, Weimin & Zhang, Yuefei, 2020. "Does a firm’s supplier concentration affect its cash holding?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 527-535.
    33. Isaac Elking & John-Patrick Paraskevas & Curtis Grimm & Thomas Corsi & Adams Steven, 2017. "Financial Dependence, Lean Inventory Strategy, and Firm Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 22-38, April.
    34. Ing-Haw Cheng & Harrison Hong & José A. Scheinkman, 2015. "Yesterday's Heroes: Compensation and Risk at Financial Firms," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(2), pages 839-879, April.
    35. Xie, En & Huang, Yuanyuan & Stevens, Charles E. & Lebedev, Sergey, 2019. "Performance feedback and outward foreign direct investment by emerging economy firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    36. Chen, Meng & Tang, Xinlin & Liu, Hefu & Gu, Jibao, 2023. "The impact of supply chain concentration on integration and business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    37. Levinthal, Daniel & March, James G., 1981. "A model of adaptive organizational search," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 307-333, December.
    38. Pino G. Audia & Henrich R. Greve, 2006. "Less Likely to Fail: Low Performance, Firm Size, and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 83-94, January.
    39. Zhang, Qingyu & Cao, Mei, 2018. "Exploring antecedents of supply chain collaboration: Effects of culture and interorganizational system appropriation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 146-157.
    40. Cheng, Lulu & Xie, En & Fang, Junyi & Mei, Nan, 2022. "Performance feedback and firms’ relative strategic emphasis: The moderating effects of board independence and media coverage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 218-231.
    41. Massimo Massa & Bohui Zhang & Hong Zhang, 2015. "The Invisible Hand of Short Selling: Does Short Selling Discipline Earnings Management?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(6), pages 1701-1736.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Lulu & Xie, En & Fang, Junyi & Mei, Nan, 2022. "Performance feedback and firms’ relative strategic emphasis: The moderating effects of board independence and media coverage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 218-231.
    2. Xi Zhong & Liuyang Ren & Tiebo Song, 2022. "Beyond Market Strategies: How Multiple Decision-Maker Groups Jointly Influence Underperforming Firms’ Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 481-499, June.
    3. Wei Shi & Guoli Chen & Boshuo Li, 2023. "Problem Solving or Responsibility Avoidance? The Role of CEO Internal Attribution Tendency in Shaping Corporate Downsizing in Response to Performance Shortfalls," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1273-1301, July.
    4. Luca Berchicci & Murat Tarakci, 2022. "Aspiration formation and attention rules," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1575-1601, August.
    5. Saridakis, Charalampos & Angelidou, Sofia & Woodside, Arch G., 2023. "How historical and social aspirations reshape the relationship between corporate financial performance and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Ploeg, Matthias & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, Patrick, 2022. "We are in it together: Communitarianism and the performance-innovation relationship✰," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    7. Hendriks, Guus & Slangen, Arjen H.L. & Heugens, Pursey P.M.A.R., 2024. "Country portfolio diversity and firms’ portfolio adjustment decisions: A behavioral perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4).
    8. Dong, Meitong & Wang, Liwen & Yang, Defeng & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2022. "Performance feedback and export intensity of Chinese private firms: Moderating roles of institution-related factors," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    9. Guo, Jianquan & Cheng, He, 2024. "Performance feedback on sales growth and M&A: Evidence from China," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Christian Schumacher & Steffen Keck & Wenjie Tang, 2020. "Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 1139-1165, June.
    11. Xie, En & Huang, Yuanyuan & Stevens, Charles E. & Lebedev, Sergey, 2019. "Performance feedback and outward foreign direct investment by emerging economy firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    12. Elizabeth Lim & Pino G. Audia, 2020. "Problem-Solving or Self-Enhancing? Influences of Diversification and Bright Spot on Corporate Resource Allocation Responses to Performance Shortfalls," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 348-368, December.
    13. Elisa Giuliani & Federica Nieri & Andrea Vezzulli, 2019. "BEST IN CLASS BUT BIG WRONGDOERS: Exploring the financial performance and human rights infringe ments nexus in large emerging country companies," Discussion Papers 2019/250, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    14. Xiao, Shufeng & Yu, Tianjiao, 2024. "Underperformance duration and R&D internationalization: Institutional contingencies in an emerging economy," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4).
    15. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Horacio E. Rousseau & Philip Bromiley, 2020. "The behavioral theory of the (community‐oriented) firm: The differing response of community‐oriented firms to performance relative to aspirations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 1023-1053, June.
    16. Yiyi Su & Steven Si, 2015. "What Motivates Financial Innovation Across Countries? The Influences of Performance Aspiration and Economic Freedom," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 563-587, August.
    17. Pasi Kuusela & Thomas Keil & Markku Maula, 2017. "Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, slack resources, and resource-consuming vs. resource-freeing organizational change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1101-1120, May.
    18. Martínez-Noya, Andrea & García-Canal, Esteban, 2021. "Innovation performance feedback and technological alliance portfolio diversity: The moderating role of firms’ R&D intensity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    19. Cao, Yue & Dong, Yizhe & Ma, Diandian & Sun, Li, 2021. "Customer concentration and corporate risk-taking," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Lin-Hua Lu & Poh-Kam Wong, 2019. "Performance feedback, financial slack and the innovation behavior of firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1079-1109, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Performance feedback; Supply chain bargaining power; Stakeholder; Performance improvement prediction; Product market power;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:275:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324001981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.