IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/poleco/v91y2026ics0176268025001557.html

When does state capacity Work? Social fragmentation and public goods provision in rural Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Jiali

Abstract

It is widely assumed that strong state capacity improves public goods provision. Yet, most existing studies treat the state as an autonomous provider, overlooking how its effects depend on societal context. This study examines how social fragmentation conditions the relationship between state capacity and public goods provision, drawing on original data from rural Japan. The findings reveal that high state capacity enhances provision only where social fragmentation is high; in more cohesive regions, strong state intervention may disrupt informal cooperation, reducing effectiveness. This non-linear effect is robust across multiple checks and is mediated through the Japan Agricultural Cooperatives. These results highlight the conditional nature of state capacity and the importance of state–society relations in shaping public goods outcomes. The study contributes to broader debates on governance and development by demonstrating that state capacity does not operate in isolation, and its effectiveness varies with the structure of social relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Jiali, 2026. "When does state capacity Work? Social fragmentation and public goods provision in rural Japan," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:poleco:v:91:y:2026:i:c:s0176268025001557
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268025001557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:poleco:v:91:y:2026:i:c:s0176268025001557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505544 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.