IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v169y2026ics0264837726002061.html

The speculation trap and the distress push: Divergent pathways of peri-urban agriculture in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Mushi, Cuthbert W.
  • Kapinga, Agnes G.

Abstract

Rapid urbanization is transforming the structure of agriculture across Africa; however, its impact on crop diversification remains debated. Using georeferenced data from the Tanzania LSMS-ISA survey and a double-hurdle econometric model, this study examines the motivators of diversification in peri-urban environments. We compare mainland with the extreme land scarcity and real-estate pressures of Zanzibar; we find important structural paradoxes. First, a negative relationship exists between formal land tenure and the degree of diversification. This finding suggests that property rights in hyper-specified markets provide incentives to the commodification of land and monoculture instead of complex farming systems. Second, the study dismisses the linear scale-diversification hypothesis by showing a strong u-shaped pattern in the mainland peri-urban zones. Micro-holders diversify mainly for survival (distress push) while large commercial farms diversify for profit (accumulation push) and leave medium-scale operations to specialize. Moreover, biophysical factors, especially heavy clay soils, significantly restrict diversification options regardless of economic incentives. These results raise questions about the validity of uniform policy frameworks and suggest that conventional land titling programs, highly speculative real-estate markets could potentially harm agro-biodiversity in rapidly growing island economies unless they are accompanied by agricultural conservation programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mushi, Cuthbert W. & Kapinga, Agnes G., 2026. "The speculation trap and the distress push: Divergent pathways of peri-urban agriculture in Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002061
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726002061
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.