IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v90y2024ics0301420724000886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does improved digital governance in government promote natural resource management? Quasi-natural experiments based on smart city pilots

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Ke
  • Li, Qiyuan
  • Shoaib, Muhammad
  • Ameer, Waqar
  • Jiang, Tao

Abstract

Based on panel data for 281 cities in China from 2007 to 2021, this paper uses the global Malmquist‒Luenberger index to measure natural resource management. Using the smart city pilot as a quasi-natural experiment in government digital governance, the progressive difference-in-differences method was used to investigate whether the government's digital governance capacity promotes green and sustainable development. The main findings are as follows: the improvement of the government's digital governance capacity significantly contributes to green and sustainable development. After a series of placebo tests and robustness tests, the results of this paper still hold. Government digital governance promotes natural resource management mainly through two mechanisms: green technology innovation and intellectual property protection, and the quality of green technology innovation plays a more critical role than quantity. The impact of improved government digital governance on natural resource management varies significantly across different types of cities, cities with different political levels, and cities with different urban locations and human capital levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Ke & Li, Qiyuan & Shoaib, Muhammad & Ameer, Waqar & Jiang, Tao, 2024. "Does improved digital governance in government promote natural resource management? Quasi-natural experiments based on smart city pilots," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724000886
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724000886
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724000886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.