IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v89y2024ics0301420723012254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon and financial performance nexus of the heavily polluting companies in the context of resource management during COVID-19 period

Author

Listed:
  • Włodarczyk, Aneta
  • Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna
  • Urbański, Mariusz

Abstract

The depletion of fossil fuels and the new EU climate policy goals to achieve a zero-emission economy after 2050 encourage highly polluting companies to increase the efficiency of energy conversion from non-renewable energy sources, develop renewable energy sources and implement resource management systems in production. Studying the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance of firms is particularly important in times of the Covid-19 pandemic, as companies' decisions to limit or continue green investments and low-emission transformation may impact access to external financing sources. The aim of this study is to identify the shape of the relationship between the carbon and financial results of heavily polluting enterprises in the context of resource management and to assess the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the considered relationship. For a panel sample of Polish enterprises representing highly polluting industries with manufacturing plants covered by the EU ETS in 2009–2021, a third-degree polynomial describing this relationship was estimated. A U-shaped relationship was identified between carbon emission intensity and return on sales and return on assets, which can be explained by the ‘too-little-of-a-good-thing’ effect. Increase in share of renewable energy in the production structure significantly reduces firms’ profitability, which can be explained by the relatively high costs associated with the development of renewable energy and the changing legal regulations regarding this type of investment. It has been shown that companies with high carbon emission intensity achieved lower sales profits and return on assets compared to companies with lower carbon intensity during the Covid-19 pandemic. The lower scale of allocation of free emission allowances compared to previous years, combined with the increase in emission allowance prices under the influence of shocks generated by the pandemic, had a negative impact on the profitability of heavily polluting companies. The modelling results provide important information to managers who, based on them, can make more informed decisions regarding the use of natural resources in production and the involvement of enterprises in investments aimed at the use of cleaner production technologies and the development of renewable energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Włodarczyk, Aneta & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna & Urbański, Mariusz, 2024. "Carbon and financial performance nexus of the heavily polluting companies in the context of resource management during COVID-19 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:89:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723012254
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723012254
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Bruyn, S. M. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. & Opschoor, J. B., 1998. "Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 161-175, May.
    2. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2020. "Stepping Up and Stepping Out of COVID-19: New Challenges for Environmental Sustainability Policies in the Global Airline Industry," MPRA Paper 101491, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2021. "General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 13-50, January.
    4. Larisa Vazhenina & Elena Magaril & Igor Mayburov, 2023. "Digital Management of Resource Efficiency of Fuel and Energy Companies in a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Ahmed Al‐Hadi & Bikram Chatterjee & Ali Yaftian & Grantley Taylor & Mostafa Monzur Hasan, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility performance, financial distress and firm life cycle: evidence from Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(2), pages 961-989, June.
    6. Guérin, Pierre & Suntheim, Felix, 2021. "Firms’ environmental performance and the COVID-19 crisis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Iwata, Hiroki & Okada, Keisuke, 2011. "How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1691-1700, July.
    8. Aastvedt, Tonje Marthinsen & Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri & Lu, Li, 2021. "Does green innovation damage financial performance of oil and gas companies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Zhang, Dongyang & Zheng, Wenping, 2022. "Does COVID-19 make the firms’ performance worse? Evidence from the Chinese listed companies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 560-570.
    10. Misani, Nicola & Pogutz, Stefano, 2015. "Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 150-160.
    11. Takashi Hatakeda & Katsuhiko Kokubu & Takehisa Kajiwara & Kimitaka Nishitani, 2012. "Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Protection Activities for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: The Relationship Between Environmental and Financial Performance," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 455-481, December.
    12. Wu, Hong, 2023. "Evaluating the role of renewable energy investment resources and green finance on the economic performance: Evidence from OECD economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Tzouvanas, Panagiotis & Kizys, Renatas & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Sagitova, Roza, 2020. "Environmental and financial performance in the European manufacturing sector: An analysis of extreme tail dependency," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    14. Wang, Juan & Li, Jing & Zhang, Qingjun, 2021. "Does carbon efficiency improve financial performance? Evidence from Chinese firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    15. Hidemichi Fujii & Kazuyuki Iwata & Shinji Kaneko & Shunsuke Managi, 2013. "Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 187-201, March.
    16. Michael L. Barnett & Robert M. Salomon, 2012. "Does it pay to be really good? addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1304-1320, November.
    17. W. Robert Reed & Haichun Ye, 2009. "Which panel data estimator should I use?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 985-1000.
    18. Wellalage, Nirosha & Reddy, Krishna & Wallace, Damien, 2023. "Environmental performance and the role of government support: Evidence from the recent COVID-19 pandemic," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    19. Fosten, Jack & Morley, Bruce & Taylor, Tim, 2012. "Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 25-33.
    20. Sandra A. Waddock & Samuel B. Graves, 1997. "The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 303-319, April.
    21. Szczygielski, Jan Jakub & Brzeszczyński, Janusz & Charteris, Ailie & Bwanya, Princess Rutendo, 2022. "The COVID-19 storm and the energy sector: The impact and role of uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    22. Horváthová, Eva, 2012. "The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 91-97.
    23. Heather Dixon-Fowler & Daniel Slater & Jonathan Johnson & Alan Ellstrand & Andrea Romi, 2013. "Beyond “Does it Pay to be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 353-366, January.
    24. Mitchell A. Petersen, 2009. "Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(1), pages 435-480, January.
    25. Horváthová, Eva, 2010. "Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 52-59, November.
    26. Leena Lankoski, 2008. "Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: a theory of why and how they are connected," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(8), pages 536-547, December.
    27. Hermundsdottir, Fanny & Haneberg, Dag Håkon & Aspelund, Arild, 2022. "Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on environmental innovations in manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    28. Bing, Tao & Ma, Hongkun, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic effect on trading and returns: Evidence from the Chinese stock market," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 384-396.
    29. Stefan Lewandowski, 2017. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: The Role of Emission Reductions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1196-1211, December.
    30. Christoph Trumpp & Thomas Guenther, 2017. "Too Little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 49-68, January.
    31. Wagner, Marcus & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2004. "The Effect of Corporate Environmental Strategy Choice and Environmental Performance on Competitiveness and Economic Performance:: An Empirical Study of EU Manufacturing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 557-572, October.
    32. zhang, Ling & Niu, Guangli, 2023. "Role of financial performance and natural resources development on economic recovery: Empirical evidence from an Asian perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    33. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    34. Michael E. Porter & Claas van der Linde, 1995. "Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 97-118, Fall.
    35. Timo Busch & Stefan Lewandowski, 2018. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 745-759, August.
    36. Abban, Abdul Rashid & Hasan, Mohammad Zahid, 2021. "The causality direction between environmental performance and financial performance in Australian mining companies - A panel data analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Ben Zaied, Younes & Managi, Shunsuke & Taleb, Lotfi, 2022. "Re-thinking about U: The relevance of regime-switching model in the relationship between environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 498-519.
    2. Sergio Manrique & Carmen-Pilar Martí-Ballester, 2017. "Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Environmental Performance on Corporate Financial Performance in Developed and Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-30, October.
    3. Qingxia (Jenny) Wang, 2023. "Financial effects of carbon risk and carbon disclosure: A review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4175-4219, December.
    4. Tzouvanas, Panagiotis & Kizys, Renatas & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Sagitova, Roza, 2020. "Environmental and financial performance in the European manufacturing sector: An analysis of extreme tail dependency," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    5. Christoph Trumpp & Thomas Guenther, 2017. "Too Little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 49-68, January.
    6. Ruiqian Li & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, 2018. "Impacts of Industrial Heterogeneity and Technical Innovation on the Relationship between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Flori, Andrea & Borghesi, Simone & Marin, Giovanni, 2024. "The environmental-financial performance nexus of EU ETS firms: A quantile regression approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. He-Boong Kwon & Jooh Lee & Laee Choi, 2023. "Dynamic interplay of environmental sustainability and corporate reputation: a combined parametric and nonparametric approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 687-719, May.
    9. Stefan Lewandowski, 2017. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: The Role of Emission Reductions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1196-1211, December.
    10. Tzouvanas, Panagiotis & Kizys, Renatas & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Sagitova, Roza, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in the European manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl, 2018. "Economic Development Matters: A Meta‐Regression Analysis on the Relation between Environmental Management and Financial Performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 720-744, August.
    12. Yenny Naranjo Tuesta & Cristina Crespo Soler & Vicente Ripoll Feliu, 2020. "The Influence of Carbon Management on the Financial Performance of European Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Saqib Aziz & Mahabubur Rahman & Dildar Hussain & Duc Nguyen, 2021. "Does corporate environmentalism affect corporate insolvency risk? The role of market power and competitive intensity," Post-Print hal-03344206, HAL.
    14. Aziz, Saqib & Rahman, Mahabubur & Hussain, Dildar & Nguyen, Duc K., 2021. "Does corporate environmentalism affect corporate insolvency risk? The role of market power and competitive intensity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Liu, Chelsea, 2018. "Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 118-142.
    16. Josep Garcia‐Blandon & David Castillo‐Merino & Nour Chams, 2020. "Sustainable development: The stock market's view of environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3273-3285, December.
    17. Al-Fakir Al Rabab'a, Eltayyeb & Rashid, Afzalur & Shams, Syed, 2023. "Corporate carbon performance and cost of debt: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas W. Rathgeber, 2019. "It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 257-273, February.
    19. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.
    20. Ryo Aruga & Keiichi Goshima & Takashi Chiba, 2022. "CO2 Emissions and Corporate Performance: Japan's Evidence with Double Machine Learning," IMES Discussion Paper Series 22-E-01, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:89:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723012254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.