IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v87y2025ics0969698925002425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The more congruent, the better? The role of recommendation content congruence on consumers' click-through intention in in-feed advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Wenfang
  • Shao, Bingjia
  • Zhang, Yong

Abstract

While format similarity is recognized as influential for in-feed ad performance, research on ad congruence has largely overlooked the role of congruence between ads and surrounding recommendation content. Drawing on the elaboration likelihood model, this study examines how this ad-recommendation content congruence influences consumer responses to social media in-feed ads. The results of four experiments show an inverted U-shaped relationship between ad congruence and consumers’ click-through intention, mediated by depth of information processing. Furthermore, the results demonstrate this effect is moderated by the in-feed channel (subscription vs. recommendation) and ad execution style (informational vs. narrative). Specifically, the subscription channel and informational ad execution amplify the positive effects of moderate congruence. These findings contribute theoretically by highlighting the potential downsides of excessive congruence and offer practical guidance for optimizing in-feed ad placement on social media platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Wenfang & Shao, Bingjia & Zhang, Yong, 2025. "The more congruent, the better? The role of recommendation content congruence on consumers' click-through intention in in-feed advertising," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925002425
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925002425
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925002425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.