IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v23y1995i6p625-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Questioning the reliability of market segmentation techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Dibb, S.
  • Stern, P.

Abstract

Market segmentation techniques and analyses have received considerable attention in the academic literature. This paper compares and contrasts the results from conducting cluster analysis and factor analysis on two data sets, one which is genuine and the other which has been randomly generated. This analysis helps test claims about the validity and effectiveness of such techniques and looks at the reliability of the output. The findings suggest that researchers need to be careful to carry out valid preliminary work before presenting their results. Without such preliminary work it may be difficult to justify the segments which emerge.

Suggested Citation

  • Dibb, S. & Stern, P., 1995. "Questioning the reliability of market segmentation techniques," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 625-636, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:6:p:625-636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(95)00042-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Green, Paul E., 1977. "A new approach to market segmentation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 61-73, February.
    2. Stephen Johnson, 1967. "Hierarchical clustering schemes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(3), pages 241-254, September.
    3. Sheppard, Blair H & Hartwick, Jon & Warshaw, Paul R, 1988. "The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(3), pages 325-343, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barjak, F. & Lindeque, J. & Koch, J. & Soland, M., 2022. "Segmenting household electricity customers with quantitative and qualitative approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Andy Choi & Franco Papandrea & Jeff Bennett, 2007. "Assessing cultural values: developing an attitudinal scale," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 31(4), pages 311-335, December.
    3. Wolf, Ingo & Schröder, Tobias, 2019. "Connotative meanings of sustainable mobility: A segmentation approach using cultural sentiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 259-280.
    4. Kovacic, Damir & Radman, Marija & Kolega, Ante, 2002. "Behaviour of Fruit and Vegetable Buyers on the City Markets in Croatia," 13th Congress, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 7-12, 2002 6963, International Farm Management Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia Quinteros-Cartaya & Guillermo Solorio-Magaña & Francisco Javier Núñez-Cornú & Felipe de Jesús Escalona-Alcázar & Diana Núñez, 2023. "Microearthquakes in the Guadalajara Metropolitan Zone, Mexico: evidence from buried active faults in Tesistán Valley, Zapopan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 2797-2818, April.
    2. Katarzyna Hampel & Paulina Ucieklak-Jez & Agnieszka Bem, 2021. "Health System Responsiveness in the Light of the Euro Health Consumer Index," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 659-667.
    3. Kim, Junyung & Shah, Asad Ullah Amin & Kang, Hyun Gook, 2020. "Dynamic risk assessment with bayesian network and clustering analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Catherine Viot & Caroline Bayart & Agnes Lancini, 2017. "The Consumer Intention to Adopt Smart Connected-Products: Does the Category Matter?," Post-Print hal-01991186, HAL.
    5. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    6. Hosseini Kashkouyieh , Seyyed Mahmoud & Asadi , Gholam Hossein & Hamidizadeh , Mohammad Reza & Moqaddasi , Mohammad, 2015. "Developing a Macro-segmentation Model at Industry Level: Iranian Banking Industry," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 10(4), pages 95-123, October.
    7. Roberts, Leigh, 2014. "Consistent estimation of breakpoints in time series, with application to wavelet analysis of Citigroup returns," Working Paper Series 18815, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    8. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Maruping, Likoebe M. & Brown, Susan A., 2006. "Role of time in self-prediction of behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 160-176, July.
    9. Tabi, Andrea & Hille, Stefanie Lena & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2014. "What makes people seal the green power deal? — Customer segmentation based on choice experiment in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 206-215.
    10. Benedek Botond & László Ede, 2019. "Identifying Key Fraud Indicators in the Automobile Insurance Industry Using SQL Server Analysis Services," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 64(2), pages 53-71, August.
    11. David G Mets & Michael S Brainard, 2018. "An automated approach to the quantitation of vocalizations and vocal learning in the songbird," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-29, August.
    12. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.
    13. Lu Wei & Tien-Tsung Lee, 2021. "Who Can I Trust in a Scary World? An Examination of the Objects of Trust, Information Sources and Social Distancing Intention Amid COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Xu, Yingjiao & Summers, Teresa A. & Belleau, Bonnie D., 2004. "Who buys American alligator?: Predicting purchase intention of a controversial product," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(10), pages 1189-1198, October.
    15. Friederike Paetz, 2016. "Persönlichkeitsmerkmale als Segmentierungsvariablen: Eine empirische Studie [Personality traits for market segmentation: An empirical study]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 279-306, August.
    16. Michael Brusco & J Dennis Cradit & Douglas Steinley, 2021. "A comparison of 71 binary similarity coefficients: The effect of base rates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Noah E. Friedkin, 1984. "Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 235-261, February.
    18. Liao, Ziqi & Shi, Xinping, 2017. "Web functionality, web content, information security, and online tourism service continuance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 258-263.
    19. David Matesanz Gomez & Guillermo J. Ortega & Benno Torgler, 2011. "Measuring globalization: A hierarchical network approach," CREMA Working Paper Series 2011-11, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    20. Sven Heidenreich & Katrin Talke, 2012. "Tarifwahl-Anomalien bei optionalen Mobilfunktarifen — Eine Analyse der Ursachen von Flatrate-Präferenz und Flatrate-Bias," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 280-307, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:6:p:625-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.