IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v145y2022icp268-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior in the workplace: The roles of knowledge-sharing hostility and mindfulness

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Liangyong
  • Liu, Yu
  • Hu, Sanman
  • Zhang, Sai

Abstract

Perceptions of organizational politics and innovation have been widely studied. However, their relationship is not well understood. Drawing on the social exchange and conservation of resources theories, this study examined their relationship and explored the mediating role of knowledge-sharing hostility and the moderating role of mindfulness. Data were collected through a time-lagged and multi-source survey that included 239 employees and their supervisors. Hierarchical multiple regression and bootstrap analyses were performed to test our hypotheses. The results showed that knowledge-sharing hostility mediated the relationship between the perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior. Moreover, mindfulness moderated both processes with which perception of organizational politics directly and, through knowledge-sharing hostility, indirectly related to innovative behavior. Managers are advised to formulate and adhere to clear regulations and policies to reduce their perception of organizational politics. They can also offer mindfulness training programs to buffer the detrimental effect of the perception of organizational politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Liangyong & Liu, Yu & Hu, Sanman & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior in the workplace: The roles of knowledge-sharing hostility and mindfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 268-276.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:145:y:2022:i:c:p:268-276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632200234X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Lerong & Huang, Liying & Yang, Guangqing, 2021. "Invest in Innovation or Not? How Managerial Cognition and Attention Allocation Shape Corporate Responses to Performance Shortfalls," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 815-850, October.
    2. Joel M. Evans & Michael G. Hendron & James B. Oldroyd, 2015. "Withholding the Ace: The Individual- and Unit-Level Performance Effects of Self-Reported and Perceived Knowledge Hoarding," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 494-510, April.
    3. Li, Zhendong & Zhang, Marina Yue & Zhang, Huiying, 2021. "Firm Growth Performance and Relative Innovation Orientation of Exploration vs Exploitation: Moderating Effects of Cluster Relationships," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 143-172, February.
    4. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    5. Montani, Francesco & Torres, Claudio & Ferreira, Maria Cristina & Mendonça, Helenides & Silva, Ana Junça & Courcy, François & Dagenais-Desmarais, Véronique, 2021. "Self-image goals, compassionate goals and innovative work behavior: The role of organizational support for innovation across countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 588-600.
    6. Newman, Alexander & Tse, Herman H.M. & Schwarz, Gary & Nielsen, Ingrid, 2018. "The effects of employees' creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-9.
    7. De Clercq, Dirk & Belausteguigoitia, Imanol, 2017. "Mitigating the negative effect of perceived organizational politics on organizational citizenship behavior: Moderating roles of contextual and personal resources," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 689-708, September.
    8. Sea-Jin Chang & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Lorraine Eden, 2010. "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 178-184, February.
    9. Dirk De Clercq & Dimo Dimov & Imanol Belausteguigoitia, 2016. "Perceptions of Adverse Work Conditions and Innovative Behavior: The Buffering Roles of Relational Resources," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(3), pages 515-542, May.
    10. Christopher C. Rosen & D. Lance Ferris & Douglas J. Brown & Yuanyi Chen & Ming Yan, 2014. "Perceptions of Organizational Politics: A Need Satisfaction Paradigm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1026-1055, August.
    11. Homsma, Gert J. & Van Dyck, Cathy & De Gilder, Dick & Koopman, Paul L. & Elfring, Tom, 2009. "Learning from error: The influence of error incident characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 115-122, January.
    12. Rosen, Christopher C. & Chang, Chu-Hsiang & Johnson, Russell E. & Levy, Paul E., 2009. "Perceptions of the organizational context and psychological contract breach: Assessing competing perspectives," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 202-217, March.
    13. James P. Walsh, 1995. "Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 280-321, June.
    14. Lyu, Chongchong & Yang, Jianjun & Zhang, Feng & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Mu, Tian, 2020. "How do knowledge characteristics affect firm’s knowledge sharing intention in interfirm cooperation? An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-60.
    15. Karen A. Bantel & Susan E. Jackson, 1989. "Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(S1), pages 107-124, June.
    16. Kim, Daeho & Shin, Jiseon & Seo, Myeong-Gu & Sung, Mi-Jin, 2021. "Enjoy the pain that you cannot avoid: Investigation on the relationship between developmental job experience and employees’ innovative behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 363-375.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Yulin Fang & Detmar W. Straub, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-331, June.
    2. Rivas, Jose Luis, 2012. "Diversity & internationalization: The case of boards and TMT's," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12.
    3. M. Díaz-Fernández & M. González-Rodríguez & Biagio Simonetti, 2015. "Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1305-1322, May.
    4. Bongjin Kim & Mark M. Suazo & John E. Prescott, 2008. "Exploring the Cognitive Nature of Boards of Directors and Its Implication for Board Effectiveness," Working Papers 0032, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    5. Saerom Lee & Felipe A. Csaszar, 2020. "Cognitive and Structural Antecedents of Innovation: A Large-Sample Study," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 71-97, June.
    6. Johannes M. Pennings & Filippo Carlo Wezel, 2010. "Faraway, Yet So Close: Organizations in Demographic Flux," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 451-468, April.
    7. Riquelme-Medina, Marta & Stevenson, Mark & Barrales-Molina, Vanesa & Llorens-Montes, Francisco Javier, 2022. "Coopetition in business Ecosystems: The key role of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 464-476.
    8. Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi & Alexander Brem, 2017. "Sustainability in SMEs: Top Management Teams Behavioral Integration as Source of Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Hensellek, Simon & Kleine-Stegemann, Lucas & Kollmann, Tobias, 2023. "Entrepreneurial leadership, strategic flexibility, and venture performance: Does founders' span of control matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Alexandra Moritz & Walter Diegel & Joern Block & Christian Fisch, 2022. "VC investors’ venture screening: the role of the decision maker’s education and experience," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 27-63, January.
    11. Niemann, Christoph Constantin & Mai, Robert & Dickel, Petra, 2022. "Nurture or nature? How organizational and individual factors drive corporate entrepreneurial projects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 155-169.
    12. Kibler, Ewald & Wincent, Joakim & Kautonen, Teemu & Cacciotti, Gabriella & Obschonka, Martin, 2019. "Can prosocial motivation harm entrepreneurs' subjective well-being?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 608-624.
    13. Lin Cui & Yi Li & Klaus E. Meyer & Zijie Li, 2015. "Leadership Experience Meets Ownership Structure: Returnee Managers and Internationalization of Emerging Economy Firms," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 355-387, June.
    14. Wendy K. Smith & Michael L. Tushman, 2005. "Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 522-536, October.
    15. Cui, Lin & Li, Yi & Li, Zijie, 2013. "Experiential drivers of foreign direct investment by late-comer Asian firms: The Chinese evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2451-2459.
    16. Michele N. Medina & Indu Ramachandran & Joshua J. Daspit, 2019. "Collaboration Or Clash? Mapping The Effects Of Top Management Team Conflict On Firm Absorptive Capacity," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(03), pages 1-29, April.
    17. Mark M. Suazo, 2007. "Implications of the Affective Response to Psychological Contract Breach," Working Papers 0028, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    18. Samuel Adomako & Ernestine Ning & Emmanuel Adu‐Ameyaw, 2021. "Proactive environmental strategy and firm performance at the bottom of the pyramid," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 422-431, January.
    19. Østergaard, Christian R. & Timmermans, Bram & Kristinsson, Kari, 2011. "Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 500-509, April.
    20. Rau, Devaki, 2006. "Top management team transactive memory, information gathering, and perceptual accuracy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 416-424, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:145:y:2022:i:c:p:268-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.