IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i3p1305-1322.html

Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change

Author

Listed:
  • M. Díaz-Fernández
  • M. González-Rodríguez
  • Biagio Simonetti

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyse the relation between the Top Management Teams (TMTs)’ socio demographic’ characteristics and the corporate strategic change, measured as Carpenter (Strateg Manag J 23:275–284, 2002 ) through Finkelstein and Hambrick’s index (Adm Sci Q 35:484–504, 1990 ): the strategic variation index and strategic deviation index in the period 2007–2009. While this aim has been studied previously in the Upper Echelon Literature, the results achieved have been considered ambiguous and no concluding by some researchers. Hence this paper admits that this complex relation rooted in this stream thought, needs to be further explored as supported by those authors. The achieved findings not only shed light on the organizational demographics’ black box but also enrichment the academic literature in this respect. A sample of 157 big firms from different industrial sector and nationalities with their headquarters in Spain was determined by using both secondary and primary sources due to the legal difficulties imposed by LORTAD which prevents the collection and consult of the top managers’ personal information unlike other countries. Lineal regression models were applied to test the hypotheses formulated in the study. By controlling for firm performance and the industrial sector, a higher educational level, shorter firm tenures, higher international experience and a higher professional background greatly influence on corporate strategy changes. Furthermore while the firm performance seems to influence the strategic change, the industrial sector does not contribute significantly on this managerial variable. Few researchers examine the influence of TMTs’ characteristics in shaping corporative strategic changes and firm outcomes using samples different from American enterprises. This paper also contributes to the existing literature by proposing different models which explain the strategic changes, measured by different indicators, using more explanatory demographical variables than in other studies and also including control variables related performance and industrial sector to reduce the ambiguity and increase the reliability of the previous researches. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • M. Díaz-Fernández & M. González-Rodríguez & Biagio Simonetti, 2015. "Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1305-1322, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:3:p:1305-1322
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0053-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0053-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-0053-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiorenzo Franceschini & Elisa Turina, 2013. "Quality improvement and redesign of performance measurement systems: an application to the academic field," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 465-483, January.
    2. Hutzschenreuter, Thomas & Horstkotte, Julian, 2013. "Performance effects of international expansion processes: The moderating role of top management team experiences," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 259-277.
    3. Brian R. Golden & Edward J. Zajac, 2001. "When will boards influence strategy? inclination × power = strategic change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(12), pages 1087-1111, December.
    4. James P. Walsh, 1995. "Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 280-321, June.
    5. Ming-Tien Tsai & Hsueh-Liang Wu & Wen-Ko Liang, 2008. "Fuzzy Decision Making for Market Positioning and Developing Strategy for Improving Service Quality in Department Stores," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 303-319, June.
    6. Michael A. Hitt & Beverly B. Tyler, 1991. "Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 327-351, July.
    7. Li, Yan & Tan, Chuan-Hoo, 2013. "Matching business strategy and CIO characteristics: The impact on organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 248-259.
    8. Patricia Pitcher & Anne D. Smith, 2001. "Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Michael Gort, 1962. "Introduction to "Diversification and Integration in American Industry"," NBER Chapters, in: Diversification and Integration in American Industry, pages 3-7, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Michael Gort, 1962. "Diversification and Integration in American Industry," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number gort62-1, January.
    11. Choelsoon Park, 2002. "The Effects of Prior Performance on the Choice Between Related and Unrelated Acquisitions: Implications for the Performance Consequences of Diversification Strategy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(7), pages 1003-1019, November.
    12. James D. Westphal & James W. Fredrickson, 2001. "Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(12), pages 1113-1137, December.
    13. Rajshree Agarwal & Constance E. Helfat, 2009. "Strategic Renewal of Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 281-293, April.
    14. Harry P. Bowen & Margarethe F. Wiersema, 2005. "Foreign‐based competition and corporate diversification strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(12), pages 1153-1171, December.
    15. Ed Clark & Anna Soulsby, 2007. "Understanding Top Management and Organizational Change Through Demographic and Processual Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 932-954, September.
    16. David B. Jemison, 1987. "Risk and the Relationship Among Strategy, Organizational Processes, and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1087-1101, September.
    17. Karen A. Bantel & Susan E. Jackson, 1989. "Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(S1), pages 107-124, June.
    18. Paula Jarzabkowski, 2003. "Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 23-55, January.
    19. Martin Kilduff & Reinhard Angelmar & Ajay Mehra, 2000. "Top Management-Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Role of Cognitions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 21-34, February.
    20. -, 1986. "Agenda = Agenda," Series Históricas 8749, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    21. Vincent L. Barker III & Paul W. Patterson Jr & George C. Mueller, 2001. "Organizational Causes and Strategic Consequences of the Extent of Top Management Team Replacement During Turnaround Attempts," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 235-270, March.
    22. Klaus Uhlenbruck & Klaus E. Meyer & Michael A. Hitt, 2003. "Organizational Transformation in Transition Economies: Resource‐based and Organizational Learning Perspectives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 257-282, March.
    23. Barker, Vincent III & Barr, Pamela S., 2002. "Linking top manager attributions to strategic reorientation in declining firms attempting turnarounds," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 963-979, December.
    24. Denis, David J & Denis, Diane K, 1995. "Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1029-1057, September.
    25. Don Knight & Craig L. Pearce & Ken G. Smith & Judy D. Olian & Henry P. Sims & Ken A. Smith & Patrick Flood, 1999. "Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 445-465, May.
    26. Maria Guadalupe & Hongyi Li & Julie Wulf, 2014. "Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 824-844, April.
    27. Bohman, Hakan & Lindfors, Maj-Britt Johansson, 1998. "Management for change: On strategic change during recession," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 57-70, January.
    28. Wen-Ting Lin & Kuei-Yang Cheng, 2013. "The effect of upper echelons’ compensation on firm internationalization," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 73-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Supriya Kumar Ghatak & Biswajit Mahanty, 2021. "Evaluating intra-project knowledge growth and its effect on co-located software team output," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1727-1750, October.
    2. Smith, Thomas & Tadesse, Amanuel F. & Vincent, Nishani Edirisinghe, 2021. "The impact of CIO characteristics on data breaches," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    3. Díaz-Fernández, M. Carmen & González- Rodríguez, M. Rosario & Simonetti, Biagio, 2020. "Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 157-168.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naranjo-Gil, David & Hartmann, Frank, 2007. "Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 735-756.
    2. Díaz-Fernández, M. Carmen & González- Rodríguez, M. Rosario & Simonetti, Biagio, 2020. "Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 157-168.
    3. HeeJung Jung & Yonghoon G. Lee & Sun Hyun Park, 2023. "Just Diverse Among Themselves: How Does Negative Performance Feedback Affect Boards’ Expertise vs. Ascriptive Diversity?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 657-679, March.
    4. Hernández-Atienza, Fernando & Rodríguez-Sanz, Juan Antonio & Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando, 2024. "The pathways of board diversity in European contexts: Exploring the influence of director types on firm performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    5. Rivas, Jose Luis, 2012. "Diversity & internationalization: The case of boards and TMT's," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12.
    6. Carmen Camelo & Mariluz Fernández‐Alles & Ana B. Hernández, 2010. "Strategic consensus, top management teams, and innovation performance," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(6), pages 678-695, September.
    7. Juan Pablo Diánez-González & Carmen Camelo-Ordaz, 2016. "How management team composition affects academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation: the mediating role of conflict," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 530-557, June.
    8. Sahaym, Arvin & Cho, Sam Yul & Kim, Sang Kyun & Mousa, Fariss-Terry, 2016. "Mixed blessings: How top management team heterogeneity and governance structure influence the use of corporate venture capital by post-IPO firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1208-1218.
    9. Østergaard, Christian R. & Timmermans, Bram & Kristinsson, Kari, 2011. "Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 500-509, April.
    10. V. K. Taysaeva, 2026. "The Concept of Top Management Teams: A Systematic Review of the Research Discourse," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, vol. 17(1).
    11. Olson, Bradley J. & Bao, Yongjian & Parayitam, Satyanarayana, 2007. "Strategic decision making within Chinese firms: The effects of cognitive diversity and trust on decision outcomes," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 35-46, March.
    12. Hutzschenreuter, Thomas & Kleindienst, Ingo, 2013. "(How) Does discretion change over time? A contribution toward a dynamic view of managerial discretion," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 264-281.
    13. Horbach, Jens & Jacob, Jojo, 2017. "The relevance of personal characteristics and gender diversity for (eco)-innovation activities at the firm-level : Results from a linked employer-employee database in Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 201711, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    14. Díaz-Fernández, M. Carmen & González-Rodríguez, M. Rosario & Simonetti, Biagio, 2015. "Top management team’s intellectual capital and firm performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 322-331.
    15. Ulrich Kaiser & Bettina Müller, 2013. "Team Heterogeneity in Startups and its Development over Time," Working Papers 337, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    16. Carl Åberg & Mariateresa Torchia, 2020. "Do boards of directors foster strategic change? A dynamic managerial capabilities perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 655-684, September.
    17. María del Carmen Triana & Toyah L. Miller & Tiffany M. Trzebiatowski, 2014. "The Double-Edged Nature of Board Gender Diversity: Diversity, Firm Performance, and the Power of Women Directors as Predictors of Strategic Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 609-632, April.
    18. repec:tsa:wpaper:0075mgt is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Razvan Lungeanu & Edward J. Zajac, 2019. "Thinking Broad and Deep: Why Some Directors Exert an Outsized Influence on Strategic Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 489-508, May.
    20. Sonja Sperber & Christian Linder, 2018. "The impact of top management teams on firm innovativeness: a configurational analysis of demographic characteristics, leadership style and team power distribution," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 285-316, January.
    21. Petra Moog & Christian Soost, 2022. "Does team diversity really matter? The connection between networks, access to financial resources, and performance in the context of university spin-offs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 323-351, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:3:p:1305-1322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.