IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v118y2020icp38-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do HRM systems impose restrictions on employee quality of life? Evidence from a sustainable HRM perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mariappanadar, Sugumar

Abstract

Sustainable human resource management (HRM) as an emerging discipline facilitates businesses to improve employees’ quality of life to achieve a social sustainability outcome. A moderated-mediation study using data from large organizations in India attempts to establish that bundles of motivation enhancing practices of an HRM system used to improve organizational performance increase the health harm of work among employees. The health harm of work is about the restrictions imposed by work on employees to improve quality of life and it is different from work stress and strain. It is demonstrated that perceived organizational support as a mediator reduces the health harm of work imposed by bundles of practices of an HRM system. However, there is limited evidence to support that employee level exchange ideology moderates the relationship between perceived organizational support and the health harm of work. Theoretical contributions and future research directions to promote sustainable HRM system are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariappanadar, Sugumar, 2020. "Do HRM systems impose restrictions on employee quality of life? Evidence from a sustainable HRM perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 38-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:38-48
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320304112
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosalia Diaz‐Carrion & Macarena López‐Fernández & Pedro M. Romero‐Fernandez, 2018. "Developing a sustainable HRM system from a contextual perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1143-1153, November.
    2. Edwards, Jeffrey R., 1995. "Alternatives to Difference Scores as Dependent Variables in the Study of Congruence in Organizational Research," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 307-324, December.
    3. Elizabeth C Ravlin & Yuan Liao & Daniel L Morrell & Kevin Au & David C Thomas, 2012. "Collectivist orientation and the psychological contract: Mediating effects of creditor exchange ideology," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 43(8), pages 772-782, October.
    4. Adina Dabu & Clint Chadwick, 2009. "Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages," Post-Print hal-00481157, HAL.
    5. Sugumar Mariappanadar, 2016. "Health harm of work from the sustainable HRM perspective: scale development and validation," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 924-944, September.
    6. Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42345, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Macey, William H. & Schneider, Benjamin, 2008. "Engaged in Engagement: We Are Delighted We Did It," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 76-83, March.
    8. Clint Chadwick & Adina Dabu, 2009. "Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 253-272, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariappanadar, Sugumar & Maurer, Iris & Kramar, Robin & Muller-Camen, Michael, 2022. "Is it a sententious claim? An examination of the quality of occupational health, safety and well-being disclosures in global reporting initiative reports across industries and countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    2. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Akriti Gupta & Aman Chadha & Vijayshri Tiwari & Arup Varma & Vijay Pereira, 2023. "Sustainable training practices: predicting job satisfaction and employee behavior using machine learning techniques," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 1913-1936, November.
    4. Sugumar Mariappanadar, 2022. "High Performance Sustainable Work Practices: Scale Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Tomasz Gigol, 2020. "Gender Differences in Engagement in Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior—Two Studies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Youngsam Cho & Yongduk Choi, 2021. "When and How Does Sustainable HRM Improve Customer Orientation of Frontline Employees? Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Stela Zhivkova, 2022. "Sustainability in the Companies Practices," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, January -.
    8. Sugumar Mariappanadar & Wayne A. Hochwarter, 2022. "A Three-Way Synergistic Effect of Work on Employee Well-Being: Human Sustainability Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Roel Schouteten & Beatrice van der Heijden & Pascale Peters & Sascha Kraus-Hoogeveen & Leonie Heres, 2021. "More Roads Lead to Rome. HR Configurations and Employee Sustainability Outcomes in Public Sector Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Jan Willem Nuis & Pascale Peters & Rob Blomme & Henk Kievit, 2021. "Dialogues in Sustainable HRM: Examining and Positioning Intended and Continuous Dialogue in Sustainable HRM Using a Complexity Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Lu, Jintao & Guo, Shuaishuai & Qu, Jiaojiao & Lin, Wenfang & Lev, Benjamin, 2023. "“Stay” or “Leave”: Influence of employee-oriented social responsibility on the turnover intention of new-generation employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Mine Karatas‐Ozkan & Çağla Özgören & Sibel Yamak & Shahnaz Ibrahim & Melike Nur Tunalıoğlu & Ashly Pinnington & Katerina Nicolopoulou & Yehuda Baruch, 2022. "Dual nature of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A blessing or a curse?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1578-1594, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wach, Bernhard A. & Wehner, Marius C. & Weißenberger, Barbara E. & Kabst, Rüdiger, 2021. "United we stand: HR and line managers’ shared views on HR strategic integration," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 410-422.
    2. Sugumar Mariappanadar, 2022. "High Performance Sustainable Work Practices: Scale Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    4. Young-Choon Kim & Taekjin Shin & Sangchan Park, 2021. "Enhancing firm performance through intra-group managerial experience: Evidence from group-affiliated firms in Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 435-465, June.
    5. Andrew Shipilov & Frédéric C. Godart & Julien Clement, 2017. "Which boundaries? How mobility networks across countries and status groups affect the creative performance of organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1232-1252, June.
    6. Klaus Möller & Ramin Gamerschlag & Finn Guenther, 2011. "Determinants and effects of human capital reporting and controlling," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 311-333, November.
    7. Zulfiqar Ali & Hongyi Sun & Murad Ali, 2017. "The Impact of Managerial and Adaptive Capabilities to Stimulate Organizational Innovation in SMEs: A Complementary PLS–SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Sriyono & Sarwendah Biduri & Bayu Proyogi, 2021. "Acceleration of performance recovery and competitiveness through non-banking financing in SMEs based on green economy: impact of Covid-19 pandemic," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Mileidy Alvarez-Melgarejo & Martha Torres-Barreto, 2018. "Resources And Capabilties, The Investigation Of Their Relations: A Bibliometric Analysis [Recursos Y Capacidades, La Investigación De Sus Relaciones: Un Análisis Bibliométrico]," Working Papers hal-01744010, HAL.
    10. Olivier Chatain & Philipp Meyer-Doyle, 2017. "Alleviating managerial dilemmas in human-capital-intensive firms through incentives: Evidence from M&A legal advisors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 232-254, February.
    11. Zheng Jane Zhao & Clint Chadwick, 2014. "What we will do versus what we can do: The relative effects of unit-level NPD motivation and capability," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1867-1880, December.
    12. Matthew Bidwell & Shinjae Won & Roxana Barbulescu & Ethan Mollick, 2015. "I used to work at Goldman Sachs! How firms benefit from organizational status in the market for human capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(8), pages 1164-1173, August.
    13. Shawn M. Riley & Steven C. Michael & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2017. "Human capital matters: Market valuation of firm investments in training and the role of complementary assets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1895-1914, September.
    14. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2013. "The economic organization of employment: systems in human resource management and industrial relations," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Bo-Xiang Hsu & Yi-Min Chen, 2021. "Why university matters: the impact of university resources on foreign workers’ human and social capital accumulation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 45-61, March.
    16. Shin, Duckjung & Woodwark, Meredith J. & Konrad, Alison M. & Jung, Yongsuhk, 2022. "Innovation strategy, voice practices, employee voice participation, and organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 392-402.
    17. Rauch, Andreas & Hatak, Isabella, 2016. "A meta-analysis of different HR-enhancing practices and performance of small and medium sized firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 485-504.
    18. Super, Janice Francis & Li, Pingshu & Ishqaidef, Ghadir & Guthrie, James P., 2016. "Group rewards, group composition and information sharing: A motivated information processing perspective," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 31-44.
    19. Richard A. Bettis & Constance E. Helfat & J. Myles Shaver & Clint Chadwick & James P. Guthrie & Xuejing Xing, 2016. "The HR executive effect on firm performance and survival," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(11), pages 2346-2361, November.
    20. Huisi (Jessica) Li & John P. Hausknecht & Lisa Dragoni, 2020. "Initial and Longer-Term Change in Unit-Level Turnover Following Leader Succession: Contingent Effects of Outgoing and Incoming Leader Characteristics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 458-476, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:38-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.