IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intman/v32y2026i2s1075425325001048.html

A systematic review of replication studies in international management: What has been done so far, and what needs to be done in the future?

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Amber Y.
  • Sun, Yuhan
  • Loon, Mark

Abstract

This study is the first scholarly attempt to systematically review replication studies in the area of international management. We identified 57 replication studies in rigorous journals covering the period up to early 2025. We carefully went through all the identified articles, classified them into six categories of replication, and synthesized eight recurring themes. We outlined the key debates in those themes and summarized the key findings and contributions of representative replication studies. Most of the replication studies were unable to fully reproduce the results of the replicated study. Compared to the original studies, the replication studies have shown significant advancements in various aspects, notably in variable measurement, data collection approach, and data analysis techniques. Many studies have moved beyond mere replication and methodological updates and have contributed fresh theoretical insights that extend the field. Although limited in numbers, the fruitful outcomes of the prior replication studies not only indicate a growing recognition of replication as a relevant method in the field of international management but also highlight the potential power of this type of research to advance theoretical developments. We made practical recommendations for future replication studies in the end.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Amber Y. & Sun, Yuhan & Loon, Mark, 2026. "A systematic review of replication studies in international management: What has been done so far, and what needs to be done in the future?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:32:y:2026:i:2:s1075425325001048
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2025.101326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425325001048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:32:y:2026:i:2:s1075425325001048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601266/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.