IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v69y2023i9p4977-4991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Replication Study of Operations Management Experiments in Management Science

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew M. Davis

    (Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853)

  • Blair Flicker

    (Darla Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208)

  • Kyle Hyndman

    (Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Elena Katok

    (Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Samantha Keppler

    (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Stephen Leider

    (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Xiaoyang Long

    (Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)

  • Jordan D. Tong

    (Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, researchers in operations management have increasingly leveraged laboratory experiments to identify key behavioral insights. These experiments inform behavioral theories of operations management, impacting domains including inventory, supply chain management, queuing, forecasting, and sourcing. Yet, until now, the replicability of most behavioral insights from these laboratory experiments has been untested. We remedy this with the first large-scale replication study in operations management. With the input of the wider operations management community, we identify 10 prominent experimental operations management papers published in Management Science , which span a variety of domains, to be the focus of our replication effort. For each paper, we conduct a high-powered replication study of the main results across multiple locations using original materials (when available and suitable). In addition, our study tests replicability in multiple modalities (in-person and online) due to laboratory closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our replication study contributes new knowledge about the robustness of several key behavioral theories in operations management and contributes more broadly to efforts in the operations management field to improve research transparency and reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew M. Davis & Blair Flicker & Kyle Hyndman & Elena Katok & Samantha Keppler & Stephen Leider & Xiaoyang Long & Jordan D. Tong, 2023. "A Replication Study of Operations Management Experiments in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 4977-4991, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:9:p:4977-4991
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4866
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:9:p:4977-4991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.