IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v126y2026ics0167668725001386.html

Welfare-enhancing annuity divisor for notional defined contribution design

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jinggong
  • Zhu, Xiaobai
  • Wei, Wei

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the optimal annuity divisor for a Notional Defined Contribution (NDC) pension scheme. Our analysis reveals that both the constant and actuarially fair annuity divisors, commonly used in practice, disproportionately benefit high-income individuals, resulting in an unintended wealth transfer from low-income to high-income groups. To address this issue, we employ an optimization framework based on a weighted social welfare function and derive the optimal annuity divisor using optimal control techniques. We present the explicit solution when the income distribution follows either Pareto or Pareto-lognormal and when the S-Gini function is adopted in prioritizing different income classes. Our findings suggest that excluding the low-income class from the NDC plan, as practiced in China, renders the NDC plan unnecessary unless the society is nearly inequality-neutral. By calibrating our model with Chinese data, we propose a progressive annuity divisor formula that adjusts for income inequality and mortality differentials, demonstrating its potential to enhance social welfare and achieve a more equitable pension system.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jinggong & Zhu, Xiaobai & Wei, Wei, 2026. "Welfare-enhancing annuity divisor for notional defined contribution design," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:126:y:2026:i:c:s0167668725001386
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.103191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668725001386
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.103191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:126:y:2026:i:c:s0167668725001386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.