IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iepoli/v65y2023ics0167624523000525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do online certifications improve job market outcomes? Evidence from an IT skills certification platform in India

Author

Listed:
  • Sengupta, Nandana
  • Chawla, Neaketa
  • Agarwal, Anna
  • Evans, James

Abstract

We estimate the returns to online skills certification for engineering graduates in India using a regression discontinuity design. Individuals in our dataset take a computer programming exam, and are required to score above a threshold to receive a widely used software engineer IT-services certificate provided by an online job skills credentialing platform in India. We find that certified candidates have approximately 0.25 higher probability of finding employment following the exam. Our results indicate that skill certification in this context is a strong one-time signal of quality. Certification cannot replace education, however, and fails to predict longer-term job market outcomes as demonstrated by the lack of estimated causal impact on current employment status or income level. Our findings suggest the promise and limits of certification in an educational market where university training is highly variable.

Suggested Citation

  • Sengupta, Nandana & Chawla, Neaketa & Agarwal, Anna & Evans, James, 2023. "Do online certifications improve job market outcomes? Evidence from an IT skills certification platform in India," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:65:y:2023:i:c:s0167624523000525
    DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2023.101067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624523000525
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2023.101067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:65:y:2023:i:c:s0167624523000525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505549 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.