IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v130y2024ics0140988323007855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does the green financial system affect environmentally friendly firms' ESG? Evidence from Chinese stock markets

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yutian
  • He, Yu

Abstract

In 2016, the Chinese authorities publicized the Guidance on Building a Green Financial System (GBGFS), which sought to guide social investment toward green industries and advance sustainable economic development. To examine whether this policy has achieved its intended effect, our study utilizes the difference-in-differences approach to investigate the influence of the GBGFS on micro level sustainable development, i.e., firms' environmental, social, and governance (ESG), and employ panel data of A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022 as the research sample. Benchmark regression and a series of robustness tests demonstrate that the GBGFS significantly promotes firms' ESG, although a two-year lag in the policy effect is evident. We also conduct a range of additional tests to investigate the policy effect in different circumstances, finding that a) the GBGFS has positive effects on environmental and social, while it has an insignificant effect on governance; b) quantile analysis reveals that the GBGFS generates about twice the boost for firms with high degrees of ESG than those with low levels; c) our threshold regression demonstrates that the policy's promotional effect doubles, when research and development (R&D) investment exceeds the threshold value, providing new empirical validation for the Porter hypothesis; and d) the GBGFS has a stronger effect on firms with political connections than those without such connections. Non-state-owned enterprises can establish political connections by hiring government officials to obtain more government support and improve ESG. In addition, the GBGFS has the strongest effect on firms in the western region followed by the eastern region, with an insignificant effect in the central region. The central government can appropriately adjust the GBGFS and encourage firms on R&D investments, so as to make the policy effect longer, more precise, stronger and wider, and finally achieve sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yutian & He, Yu, 2024. "How does the green financial system affect environmentally friendly firms' ESG? Evidence from Chinese stock markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:130:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007855
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007855
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green financial system; Environmentally friendly firms; Environmental; social; and governance; Research and Development; Difference-in-differences approach; Threshold effect analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:130:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.