IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v309y2023i1p421-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dancing with rivals: How does platform’s information usage benefit independent sellers?

Author

Listed:
  • Lam, Wing Man Wynne
  • Liu, Xingyi

Abstract

Platforms greatly facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers. At the same time, this allows platforms to gather detailed information on transactions and tailor their strategies when introducing their own products that compete with independent sellers. Concerns have been raised that such an information advantage of platforms can hurt sellers. To investigate the impact of information usage by platforms, we analyze a dynamic game-theoretic model where competing sellers trade via a platform that has access to information at various levels of granularity. We show that the usage of more detailed and individualized information by the platform can actually benefit sellers. This occurs as sellers compete less intensely, anticipating that the platform would take advantage of more individualized information to target the more successful sellers. The competition relaxing effect is particularly strong when sellers are close substitutes and face little demand uncertainty within their product category. In such cases, both the platform and sellers could benefit from more individualized information usage, but consumers may be hurt.

Suggested Citation

  • Lam, Wing Man Wynne & Liu, Xingyi, 2023. "Dancing with rivals: How does platform’s information usage benefit independent sellers?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 421-431.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:309:y:2023:i:1:p:421-431
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.12.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722009742
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.12.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1982. "Limit Pricing and Entry under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 443-459, March.
    2. Zennyo, Yusuke, 2020. "Strategic contracting and hybrid use of agency and wholesale contracts in e-commerce platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(1), pages 231-239.
    3. Lin Tian & Asoo J. Vakharia & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Yifan Xu, 2018. "Marketplace, Reseller, or Hybrid: Strategic Analysis of an Emerging E‐Commerce Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1595-1610, August.
    4. Feng Zhu & Qihong Liu, 2018. "Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2618-2642, October.
    5. Wei, Yuansheng & Dong, Yuxuan, 2022. "Product distribution strategy in response to the platform retailer's marketplace introduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 986-996.
    6. Yan, Yingchen & Zhao, Ruiqing & Xing, Tiantian, 2019. "Strategic introduction of the marketplace channel under dual upstream disadvantages in sales efficiency and demand information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 968-982.
    7. Timothy W. McGuire & Richard Staelin, 2008. "An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 115-130, 01-02.
    8. Gabrielsen, Tommy Staahl & Sorgard, Lars, 2007. "Private labels, price rivalry, and public policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 403-424, February.
    9. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Kinshuk Jerath & Z. John Zhang, 2016. "Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2259-2280, August.
    10. Federico Etro, 2021. "Product selection in online marketplaces," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 614-637, August.
    11. Andrei Hagiu & Tat‐How Teh & Julian Wright, 2022. "Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 297-327, June.
    12. Zhuoxin Li & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2014. "Supplier Encroachment Under Asymmetric Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 449-462, February.
    13. Oz Shy & Zhu Wang, 2011. "Why Do Payment Card Networks Charge Proportional Fees?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1575-1590, June.
    14. Feng Zhu, 2019. "Friends or foes? Examining platform owners’ entry into complementors’ spaces," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 23-28, January.
    15. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    16. Wei, Jie & Lu, Jinghui & Zhao, Jing, 2020. "Interactions of competing manufacturers’ leader-follower relationship and sales format on online platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 508-522.
    17. Wen Wen & Feng Zhu, 2019. "Threat of platform‐owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(9), pages 1336-1367, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federico Etro, 2023. "e-Commerce Platforms and Self-preferencing," Working Papers - Economics wp2023_07.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    2. Liu, He & Xu, Tianting & Jing, Shuai & Liu, Zhidong & Wang, Shouyang, 2023. "The interplay between logistics strategy and platform’s channel structure design in B2C platform market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 812-833.
    3. Qin, Xuelian & Liu, Zhixue & Tian, Lin, 2021. "The optimal combination between selling mode and logistics service strategy in an e-commerce market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 639-651.
    4. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Liu, He & Li, Jialu & Zhang, Kai & Lev, Benjamin, 2023. "Channel strategies when digital platforms emerge: A systematic literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Lixi Zhou & Tijun Fan & Jie Yang & Lihao Zhang, 2022. "Monopolistic vs. Competitive Supply Chain Concerning Selection of the Platform Selling Mode in Three Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Kittaka, Yuta & Sato, Susumu & Zennyo, Yusuke, 2023. "Self-preferencing by platforms: A literature review," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Alaei, Amir Mohammad & Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Rabbani, Masoud, 2022. "Marketplace, reseller, or web-store channel: The impact of return policy and cross-channel spillover from marketplace to web-store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Zhou, Yu & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Suyuan & Xiong, Yu & Ye, Niangyue, 2022. "Anti-Counterfeiting in a retail Platform: A Game-Theoretic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Zhong, Qinjia & Wang, Jianjun & Zou, Zongbao & Lai, Xiaofan, 2023. "The incentives for information sharing in online retail platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Shi, Dan & Wang, Meiqi & Li, Xiang, 2021. "Strategic introduction of marketplace platform and its impacts on supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. Chen, Pingping & Zhao, Ruiqing & Yan, Yingchen & Zhou, Chi, 2021. "Promoting end-of-season product through online channel in an uncertain market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 935-948.
    12. Luo, Huajiang & Zhong, Ling & Nie, Jiajia, 2022. "Quality and distribution channel selection on a hybrid platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Aika Monden & Yusuke Zennyo, 2022. "Consumer rebates from e‐commerce platforms and multichannel management of third‐party sellers," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 3059-3071, October.
    14. Wei, Yuansheng & Dong, Yuxuan, 2022. "Product distribution strategy in response to the platform retailer's marketplace introduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 986-996.
    15. Xie, Jiaping & Wei, Lihong & Zhu, Weijun & Zhang, Weisi, 2021. "Platform supply chain pricing and financing: Who benefits from e-commerce consumer credit?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    17. Zhen, Xueping & Xu, Shuangshuang, 2022. "Who should introduce the third-party platform channel under different pricing strategies?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 168-182.
    18. Suyuan Luo & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "E‐commerce supply chains with considerations of cyber‐security: Should governments play a role?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, May.
    19. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    20. Deqing Ma & Pengcheng Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2024. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Adoption on an E-Commerce Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumer Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-41, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:309:y:2023:i:1:p:421-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.