IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12233.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Data-Driven Platform Encroachment

Author

Listed:
  • Chongwoo Choe
  • Antoine Dubus
  • Noriaki Matsushima
  • Shiva Shekhar

Abstract

Marketplace platforms are central players in online retail and are in an advantageous position to leverage data generated by third-party sellers. This paper analyzes how a platform's encroachment decision - whether to enter its marketplace as a direct competitor - is shaped by regulations that restrict its use of seller data. We show that the platform's encroachment decision follows a non-monotonic pattern: it enters against sellers with either relatively low or sufficiently high brand value, but remains a pure intermediary for intermediate brand values. The data ban regulation alters this strategy by making the platform more likely to exclude low brand-value sellers and more likely to accommodate high brand-value sellers. The implication is that, while such regulation can enhance competition in markets with high-value sellers, it can inadvertently harm sellers and reduce consumer surplus in emerging markets, where sellers typically lack brand recognition and depend on platform visibility. These results underscore the need for more nuanced regulatory approaches - promoting data sharing in emerging markets and targeted bans in mature, established markets - to better balance welfare and competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Chongwoo Choe & Antoine Dubus & Noriaki Matsushima & Shiva Shekhar, 2025. "Data-Driven Platform Encroachment," CESifo Working Paper Series 12233, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12233.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2023. "Data‐enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(4), pages 638-667, December.
    2. Hsing Kenneth Cheng & D. Daniel Sokol & Xinyu Zang, 2024. "The rise of empirical online platform research in the new millennium," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 416-451, March.
    3. Lam, Wing Man Wynne & Liu, Xingyi, 2023. "Dancing with rivals: How does platform’s information usage benefit independent sellers?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 421-431.
    4. Andrei Hagiu & Tat‐How Teh & Julian Wright, 2022. "Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 297-327, June.
    5. Shopova, Radostina, 2023. "Private labels in marketplaces," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Baoshan Liu & Xu Guan & Yulan Wang, 2021. "Supplier Encroachment with Multiple Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3523-3539, October.
    7. Simon Anderson & Özlem Bedre Defolie, 2024. "Hybrid platform model: monopolistic competition and a dominant firm," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 55(4), pages 684-718, December.
    8. Lian Qi & Haotian Song & Wenqiang Xiao, 2025. "Coopetition in Platform-Based Retailing: On the Platform’s Entry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 4013-4027, May.
    9. Feng Zhu & Qihong Liu, 2018. "Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2618-2642, October.
    10. Feng Zhu, 2019. "Friends or foes? Examining platform owners’ entry into complementors’ spaces," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 23-28, January.
    11. Hsing Kenneth Cheng & Kyung Sung Jung & Young Kwark & Jingchuan Pu, 2023. "Impact of Own Brand Product Introduction on Optimal Pricing Models for Platform and Incumbent Sellers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1131-1147, September.
    12. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    13. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    14. Yanli Tang & Suresh P. Sethi & Yulan Wang, 2023. "Games of supplier encroachment channel selection and e‐tailer's information sharing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3650-3664, November.
    15. Yong Zha & Quan Li & Tingliang Huang & Yugang Yu, 2023. "Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 659-678, July.
    16. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    17. Song Huang & Xu Guan & Ying†Ju Chen, 2018. "Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(6), pages 1133-1147, June.
    18. Sunil Mithas & Zhi‐Long Chen & Terence J.V. Saldanha & Alysson De Oliveira Silveira, 2022. "How will artificial intelligence and Industry 4.0 emerging technologies transform operations management?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4475-4487, December.
    19. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    20. Federico Etro, 2021. "Product selection in online marketplaces," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 614-637, August.
    21. Yusuke Zennyo, 2022. "Platform Encroachment and Own‐Content Bias," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 684-710, September.
    22. Zekun Liu & Dennis J. Zhang & Fuqiang Zhang, 2021. "Information Sharing on Retail Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 606-619, May.
    23. Tal Avinadav & Tatyana Chernonog & Noam Shamir, 2025. "Information Provision from a Platform to Competing Sellers: The Role of Strategic Ambiguity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 269-286, January.
    24. Baojun Jiang & Kinshuk Jerath & Kannan Srinivasan, 2011. "Firm Strategies in the "Mid Tail" of Platform-Based Retailing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 757-775, September.
    25. Wen Wen & Feng Zhu, 2019. "Threat of platform‐owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(9), pages 1336-1367, September.
    26. Yiting Deng & Christopher S. Tang & Wei Wang & Onesun Steve Yoo, 2023. "Can Third-Party Sellers Benefit from a Platform’s Entry to the Market?," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 233-249, December.
    27. Velibor V. Mišić & Georgia Perakis, 2020. "Data Analytics in Operations Management: A Review," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 158-169, January.
    28. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Yanli & Sethi, Suresh P. & Wang, Yulan, 2025. "Supplier and platform led games of supplier encroachment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Lin, Xiaogang & Chen, Ying-Ju & Xiong, Hui, 2024. "Manufacturers’ efforts and platform’s demand information sharing in eco-friendly actions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Leda Maria Bonazzi & Riccardo Martina & Giovanni Ursino, 2025. "Hybrid platforms with free entry: demand-enhancing activities," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(1), pages 81-106, March.
    4. Zhu, Haoruo & Ni, Yaodong & Xiao, Yongbo, 2025. "Information sharing across competing platforms with varying information capabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 125-138.
    5. Lam, Wing Man Wynne & Liu, Xingyi, 2023. "Dancing with rivals: How does platform’s information usage benefit independent sellers?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 421-431.
    6. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    7. Federico Etro, 2024. "e‐Commerce platforms and self‐preferencing," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1516-1543, September.
    8. Dendorfer, Florian, 2024. "First-party selling and self-preferencing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Kittaka, Yuta & Sato, Susumu & Zennyo, Yusuke, 2023. "Self-preferencing by platforms: A literature review," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    11. Tan, Yinliang (Ricky) & Yu, Chuanbin & Liu, Yang & Zheng, Quan, 2024. "Agency models in online platforms: A review of recent developments and future prospects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 679-695.
    12. Zhong, Qinjia & Wang, Jianjun & Zou, Zongbao & Lai, Xiaofan, 2023. "The incentives for information sharing in online retail platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    13. Axel Gautier & Leonardo Madio & Shiva Shekhar, 2025. "Network Externalities and Platform Strategy: Agency, Bundles Entry, and Integration," CESifo Working Paper Series 11711, CESifo.
    14. Liang, Lunhai & Ye, Fei, 2024. "Information transparency and business mode selection in online platforms under manufacturer competition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Jianghua Wu & Yuan Xue & Jiahao Yu, 2024. "A strategic analysis of timing of wholesale pricing and information sharing strategy in dual-channel retailing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1219-1240, July.
    16. Bian, Yiwen & Wang, Hang & Yan, Shuai & Han, Xiaohua, 2024. "Platform channel strategy of selling format: Effect of asymmetric service information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Etro, Federico, 2023. "Platform competition with free entry of sellers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Martin Peitz, 2024. "The Economic Theory of Two-Sided Platforms," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_584, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    19. Li, Qiyang, 2025. "Buying from a rival: The effect of knowledge sharing, co-opetition and signal inference," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Van Dyck, Marc & Lüttgens, Dirk & Diener, Kathleen & Piller, Frank & Pollok, Patrick, 2024. "From product to platform: How incumbents' assumptions and choices shape their platform strategy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L42 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Vertical Restraints; Resale Price Maintenance; Quantity Discounts

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.