IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v307y2023i3p991-1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of dynamic models of product quality

Author

Listed:
  • De Giovanni, Pietro
  • Zaccour, Georges

Abstract

We review dynamic quality models both in single-agent setup and in a competitive framework. Our objectives are: (1) to give the reader a vantage point on the state of the art in this area, (2) to identify the boundaries between the different concepts of quality to help build a bridge between the various communities interested in the management of quality, and (3) to sketch out a research agenda for the area. The paper should not only be of interest to active researchers in the field, but also to a broader community of scholars and practitioners working in operations management, marketing, industrial engineering and operations research, who are interested in quality dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "A survey of dynamic models of product quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 991-1007.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:307:y:2023:i:3:p:991-1007
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.06.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722004830
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.06.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Utsav Sadana & Puduru Viswanadha Reddy & Tamer Başar & Georges Zaccour, 2021. "Sampled-Data Nash Equilibria in Differential Games with Impulse Controls," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 999-1022, September.
    2. Gaimon, Cheryl, 1988. "Simultaneous and dynamic price, production, inventory and capacity decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 426-441, June.
    3. Rubel, Olivier, 2018. "Profiting from product-harm crises in competitive markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 219-227.
    4. Olivier Rubel & Prasad A. Naik & Shuba Srinivasan, 2011. "Optimal Advertising When Envisioning a Product-Harm Crisis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1048-1065, November.
    5. Chenavaz, Régis, 2012. "Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 553-557.
    6. Fouad El Ouardighi & Gustav Feichtinger & Dieter Grass & Richard F. Hartl & Peter M. Kort, 2016. "Advertising and Quality-Dependent Word-of-Mouth in a Contagion Sales Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 323-342, July.
    7. Lambertini, Luca & Mantovani, Andrea, 2009. "Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approach," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 508-518, July.
    8. Mukherjee, Arka & Chauhan, Satyaveer S., 2021. "The impact of product recall on advertising decisions and firm profit while envisioning crisis or being hazard myopic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 953-970.
    9. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Feichtinger, Gustav & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M., 2020. "Modeling the impact of product quality on dynamic pricing and advertising policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 990-1001.
    10. Janice E. Carrillo & Cheryl Gaimon, 2000. "Improving Manufacturing Performance Through Process Change and Knowledge Creation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 265-288, February.
    11. Jian Ni & Shoude Li, 2019. "When better quality or higher goodwill can result in lower product price: A dynamic analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(5), pages 726-736, May.
    12. Wang, Xiaojun & Li, Dong, 2012. "A dynamic product quality evaluation based pricing model for perishable food supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 906-917.
    13. Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Thompson, Gerald L., 1996. "Optimal strategies for general price-quality decision models of new products with learning production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 476-489, September.
    14. Farshbaf-Geranmayeh, Amir & Zaccour, Georges, 2021. "Pricing and advertising in a supply chain in the presence of strategic consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Régis Chenavaz & Sajjad M. Jasimuddin, 2017. "An analytical model of the relationship between product quality and advertising," Post-Print hal-01685892, HAL.
    16. Charles H. Fine, 1986. "Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1301-1315, October.
    17. L. Colombo & L. Lambertini, 2003. "Dynamic Advertising Under Vertical Product Differentiation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 261-280, November.
    18. Voros, Jozsef, 2006. "The dynamics of price, quality and productivity improvement decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 809-823, May.
    19. Chahim, Mohammed & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M., 2012. "A tutorial on the deterministic Impulse Control Maximum Principle: Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 18-26.
    20. Christopher D. Ittner & Venky Nagar & Madhav V. Rajan, 2001. "An Empirical Examination of Dynamic Quality-Based Learning Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 563-578, April.
    21. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Pasin, Federico, 2006. "Quality improvement and goodwill accumulation in a dynamic duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1021-1032, December.
    22. Mukhopadhyay, Samar K. & Setaputra, Robert, 2007. "A dynamic model for optimal design quality and return policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1144-1154, August.
    23. Luca Lambertini & Raimondello Orsini, 2015. "Quality Improvement and Process Innovation in Monopoly: A Dynamic Analysis," Working Paper series 15-12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    24. Fouad El Ouardighi & Steffen Jørgensen & Federico Pasin, 2008. "A Dynamic Game Of Operations And Marketing Management In A Supply Chain," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(04), pages 373-397.
    25. Reddy, Puduru V. & Wrzaczek, Stefan & Zaccour, Georges, 2016. "Quality effects in different advertising models - An impulse control approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 984-995.
    26. El Ouardighi, Fouad, 2014. "Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: A two-stage game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 260-268.
    27. Shoude Li, 2021. "Dynamic optimal control of a firm’s product-process innovation with expected quality effects in a monopoly exhibiting network externality," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(11), pages 2557-2579, November.
    28. Fouad El Ouardighi & Gustav Feichtinger & Gila E. Fruchter, 2018. "Accelerating the diffusion of innovations under mixed word of mouth through marketing–operations interaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 264(1), pages 435-458, May.
    29. Fouad El Ouardighi & Konstantin Kogan, 2013. "Dynamic conformance and design quality in a supply chain: an assessment of contracts’ coordinating power," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 137-166, December.
    30. Narasimhan, Ram & Ghosh, Soumen, 1994. "A dynamic model of manufacturing quality's effect on optimal advertising and pricing policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 485-502, February.
    31. Arieh Gavious & Oded Lowengart, 2012. "Price–quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 137-161, March.
    32. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Taboubi, Sihem & Zaccour, Georges, 2012. "Dual role of price and myopia in a marketing channel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 284-295.
    33. Kouvelis, Panagiotis & Mukhopadhyay, Samar K., 1995. "The effects of learning on the firm's optimal design quality path," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 235-249, July.
    34. Voros, Jozsef, 2019. "An analysis of the dynamic price-quality relationship," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1037-1045.
    35. Lu, Lijue & Navas, Jorge, 2021. "Advertising and quality improving strategies in a supply chain when facing potential crises," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 839-851.
    36. Lambertini, Luca, 2018. "Coordinating research and development efforts for quality improvement along a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 599-605.
    37. Sadana, Utsav & Reddy, Puduru Viswanadha & Zaccour, Georges, 2021. "Nash equilibria in nonzero-sum differential games with impulse control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 792-805.
    38. De Giovanni, Pietro, 2011. "Quality improvement vs. advertising support: Which strategy works better for a manufacturer?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 119-130, January.
    39. Guowei Liu & Suresh P. Sethi & Jianxiong Zhang, 2016. "Myopic vs. far-sighted behaviours in a revenue-sharing supply chain with reference quality effects," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1334-1357, March.
    40. Nair, Anand & Narasimhan, Ram, 2006. "Dynamics of competing with quality- and advertising-based goodwill," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 462-474, November.
    41. Luca Lambertini & Andrea Mantovani, 2010. "Process and product innovation: A differential game approach to product life cycle," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 6(2), pages 227-252, June.
    42. Buratto, Alessandra & Cesaretto, Rudy & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2019. "Consignment contracts with cooperative programs and price discount mechanisms in a dynamic supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 72-82.
    43. Caulkins, Jonathan P. & Feichtinger, Gustav & Grass, Dieter & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M. & Seidl, Andrea, 2017. "Interaction of pricing, advertising and experience quality: A dynamic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 877-885.
    44. Samar K. Mukhopadhyay & Panagiotis Kouvelis, 1997. "A Differential Game Theoretic Model for Duopolistic Competition on Design Quality," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 886-893, December.
    45. Perera, Sandun & Gupta, Varun & Buckley, Winston, 2020. "Management of online server congestion using optimal demand throttling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 324-342.
    46. Ouardighi, Fouad El & Tapiero, Charles S., 1998. "Quality and the diffusion of innovations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 31-38, April.
    47. Lambertini, Luca & Orsini, Raimondello & Palestini, Arsen, 2017. "On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 703-712.
    48. Roberto Cellini & Luca Lambertini, 2004. "Private And Social Incentives Towards Investment In Product Differentiation," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(04), pages 493-508.
    49. Yehuda Kotowitz & Frank Mathewson, 1979. "Advertising, Consumer Information, and Product Quality," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(2), pages 566-588, Autumn.
    50. Régis Chenavaz, 2011. "Dynamic pricing rule and R&D," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(3), pages 2229-2236.
    51. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida, 2021. "Dynamic decision making in a mixed market under cooperation: Towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    52. Morris A. Cohen & Jehoshua Eliasberg & Teck-Hua Ho, 1996. "New Product Development: The Performance and Time-to-Market Tradeoff," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 173-186, February.
    53. Guowei Liu & Jianxiong Zhang & Wansheng Tang, 2015. "Joint dynamic pricing and investment strategy for perishable foods with price-quality dependent demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 397-416, March.
    54. Shoude Li & Susu Cheng & Dongdong Li, 2020. "Dynamic control of a monopolist’s product and process innovation with reference quality," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(36), pages 3933-3950, July.
    55. Pietro De Giovanni, 2020. "An optimal control model with defective products and goodwill damages," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 419-430, June.
    56. Lin, Pei-Chun, 2008. "Optimal pricing, production rate, and quality under learning effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(11), pages 1152-1159, November.
    57. George Li & S. Rajagopalan, 1998. "Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1517-1532, November.
    58. Fouad El Ouardighi & Matan Shniderman, 2019. "Supplier’s opportunistic behavior and the quality-efficiency tradeoff with conventional supply chain contracts," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(11), pages 1915-1937, November.
    59. Pan, Xiaojun & Li, Shoude, 2016. "Dynamic optimal control of process–product innovation with learning by doing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 136-145.
    60. Dawid, Herbert & Keoula, Michel Y. & Kopel, Michael & Kort, Peter M., 2015. "Product innovation incentives by an incumbent firm: A dynamic analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 411-438.
    61. Liu, Guowei & Zhang, Jianxiong & Tang, Wansheng, 2015. "Strategic transfer pricing in a marketing–operations interface with quality level and advertising dependent goodwill," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-15.
    62. Li, Shoude & Ni, Jian, 2016. "A dynamic analysis of investment in process and product innovation with learning-by-doing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 104-108.
    63. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Kim, Bowon, 2010. "Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 329-340, October.
    64. G. E. Fruchter, 2009. "Signaling Quality: Dynamic Price-Advertising Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 479-496, December.
    65. Cellini, Roberto & Lambertini, Luca, 2002. "A differential game approach to investment in product differentiation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 51-62, November.
    66. Zhong, Genyuan & Zhang, Weihang, 2018. "Product and process innovation with knowledge accumulation in monopoly: A dynamic analysis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 175-178.
    67. Suresh Chand & Herbert Moskowitz & Andreas Novak & Ishpal Rekhi & Gerhard Sorger, 1996. "Capacity Allocation for Dynamic Process Improvement with Quality and Demand Considerations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 964-975, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Lijue & Navas, Jorge, 2021. "Advertising and quality improving strategies in a supply chain when facing potential crises," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 839-851.
    2. Anton, Ramona & Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Paraschiv, Corina, 2023. "Dynamic pricing, reference price, and price-quality relationship," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Ni, Jian & Zhao, Jun & Chu, Lap Keung, 2021. "Supply contracting and process innovation in a dynamic supply chain with information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 552-562.
    4. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Feichtinger, Gustav & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M., 2020. "Modeling the impact of product quality on dynamic pricing and advertising policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 990-1001.
    5. Régis Chenavaz & Sajjad M. Jasimuddin, 2017. "An analytical model of the relationship between product quality and advertising," Post-Print hal-01685892, HAL.
    6. Genlong Guo & Shoude Li, 2023. "A dynamic analysis of a monopolist's efforts for improving product quality and process innovation with reference price effects under linear demand," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2328-2345, June.
    7. Ni, Jian & Xu, Yue & Shi, Jia & Li, Jiali, 2024. "Product innovation in a supply chain with information asymmetry: Is more private information always worse?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 229-240.
    8. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Managing quality and pricing during a product recall: An analysis of pre-crisis, crisis and post-crisis regimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 406-420.
    9. Guan, Zhimin & Ye, Tong & Yin, Rui, 2020. "Channel coordination under Nash bargaining fairness concerns in differential games of goodwill accumulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 916-930.
    10. Fan Zhang & Susu Cheng, 2021. "Behavioral choices in a dynamic duopoly with process innovation and sticky price: Myopia versus farsightedness," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 662-674, April.
    11. Song, Jian & Chutani, Anshuman & Dolgui, Alexandre & Liang, Liang, 2021. "Dynamic innovation and pricing decisions in a supply-Chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Voros, Jozsef, 2019. "An analysis of the dynamic price-quality relationship," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1037-1045.
    13. Pietro De Giovanni, 2020. "An optimal control model with defective products and goodwill damages," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 419-430, June.
    14. Vörös, József, 2008. "A kereslet hatása az árak, a minőség és a fejlesztési döntések dinamikájára [The effect of demand on the dynamics of prices, quality and development decisions]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1094-1115.
    15. Vörös, József, 2013. "Multi-period models for analyzing the dynamics of process improvement activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 615-623.
    16. Lambertini, Luca & Orsini, Raimondello & Palestini, Arsen, 2017. "On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 703-712.
    17. Jürgen Antony & Torben Klarl, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer, Transitional Dynamics and Optimal Research & Development Policy in a Dynamic Monopoly Setting," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(3), pages 579-606, November.
    18. Dongdong Li & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2022. "Does environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) promote green product and process innovation?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1439-1447, July.
    19. Balázs Szabó & Sándor Danka, 2022. "State aid and the learning‐by‐doing effect on product pricing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 228-240, January.
    20. Liu, Guowei & Zhang, Jianxiong & Tang, Wansheng, 2015. "Strategic transfer pricing in a marketing–operations interface with quality level and advertising dependent goodwill," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:307:y:2023:i:3:p:991-1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.