IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v235y2025ics0921800925001132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of the EU electronics market and its impact on direct material consumption: Lessons from the past

Author

Listed:
  • Compagnoni, Marco
  • Santini, Erica

Abstract

The direct material consumption of technological systems is connected to three challenges: the overall metabolism of the technological system; the growing material complexity of technologies; their reliance on critical or geologically scarce materials. These challenges are often examined in isolation, overlooking their interrelated nature. We propose a systematic, multi-level perspective, leveraging concepts from Ecology and Industrial Ecology, namely scale and product ecosystem. Indeed, when investigating empirically the material consumption of technologies, i.e. electronic products, it is essential to acknowledge their co-evolution and to explicitly define the boundaries of the scrutinized system. We exploit a dataset detailed in technology and material identification, to develop a longitudinal, bottom-up analysis disentangling the direct material consumption patterns at the market, functional group, and material levels over three decades in Europe. Results indicate that strategies improving the material consumption dynamics at one level of the system may have adverse effects at others. Reductions in materials consumption stem primarily from changes in the composition of the technological system rather than functional dematerialization. Notably, technological convergence, the shift from single-function to multi-functional devices, emerges as a significant contributor to reduced materials usage. However, the increasing functionality of technologies is at the same time the main risk of directing the electronic market towards a dependence from some specific critical and geologically scarce materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Compagnoni, Marco & Santini, Erica, 2025. "The evolution of the EU electronics market and its impact on direct material consumption: Lessons from the past," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:235:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925001132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blengini, Gian Andrea & Nuss, Philip & Dewulf, Jo & Nita, Viorel & Peirò, Laura Talens & Vidal-Legaz, Beatriz & Latunussa, Cynthia & Mancini, Lucia & Blagoeva, Darina & Pennington, David & Pellegrini,, 2017. "EU methodology for critical raw materials assessment: Policy needs and proposed solutions for incremental improvements," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 12-19.
    2. T. E. Graedel & Barbara K. Reck, 2016. "Six Years of Criticality Assessments: What Have We Learned So Far?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(4), pages 692-699, August.
    3. Christian Hagelüken & Daniel Goldmann, 2022. "Recycling and circular economy—towards a closed loop for metals in emerging clean technologies," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(3), pages 539-562, December.
    4. Li, George Yunxiong & Ascani, Andrea & Iammarino, Simona, 2024. "The material basis of modern technologies. A case study on rare metals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    5. Arfaoui, Nabila & Brouillat, Eric & Saint Jean, Maïder, 2014. "Policy design and technological substitution: Investigating the REACH regulation in an agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 347-365.
    6. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1973. "Innovative Responses to Materials Shortages," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 111-118, May.
    7. Parajuly, Keshav & Habib, Komal & Liu, Gang, 2017. "Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Denmark: Flows, quantities and management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 85-92.
    8. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Gossart, Cédric & Ozman, Muge, 2014. "Technological pervasiveness and variety of innovators in Green ICT: A patent-based analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1827-1839.
    9. Lauridsen, Erik Hagelskjær & Jørgensen, Ulrik, 2010. "Sustainable transition of electronic products through waste policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 486-494, May.
    10. Desmarchelier, Benoît & Djellal, Faridah & Gallouj, Faïz, 2013. "Environmental policies and eco-innovations by service firms: An agent-based model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(7), pages 1395-1408.
    11. Geels, Frank W., 2010. "Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 495-510, May.
    12. Gaffuri, Pierre & Stolyarova, Elena & Llerena, Daniel & Appert, Estelle & Consonni, Marianne & Robin, Stéphane & Consonni, Vincent, 2021. "Potential substitutes for critical materials in white LEDs: Technological challenges and market opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Cédric Gossart, 2015. "Rebound effects and ICT : a review of the literature," Post-Print hal-01258112, HAL.
    14. Gibson, Clark C. & Ostrom, Elinor & Ahn, T. K., 2000. "The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 217-239, February.
    15. Mayer, Andreas & Haas, Willi & Wiedenhofer, Dominik, 2017. "How Countries' Resource Use History Matters for Human Well-being – An Investigation of Global Patterns in Cumulative Material Flows from 1950 to 2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Harold Hotelling, 1931. "The Economics of Exhaustible Resources," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(2), pages 137-137.
    17. Manfred Lenzen & Arne Geschke & James West & Jacob Fry & Arunima Malik & Stefan Giljum & Llorenç Milà i Canals & Pablo Piñero & Stephan Lutter & Thomas Wiedmann & Mengyu Li & Maartje Sevenster & Janez, 2022. "Implementing the material footprint to measure progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 12," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(2), pages 157-166, February.
    18. Partha Dasgupta & Aisha Dasgupta & Scott Barrett, 2023. "Population, Ecological Footprint and the Sustainable Development Goals," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(3), pages 659-675, March.
    19. Shahana Althaf & Callie W. Babbitt & Roger Chen, 2021. "The evolution of consumer electronic waste in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 693-706, June.
    20. Mazzarano, Matteo, 2020. "Estimating total potential material recovery from EEE in EU28," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    21. Zhu, Xuan & Lane, Ruth & Werner, T.T., 2017. "Modelling in-use stocks and spatial distributions of household electronic devices and their contained metals based on household survey data," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 27-37.
    22. Mazzarano, Matteo, 2022. "Material governance and circularity policies: How waste policies and innovation affect household appliances' accumulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    23. Heinz Schandl & Marina Fischer‐Kowalski & James West & Stefan Giljum & Monika Dittrich & Nina Eisenmenger & Arne Geschke & Mirko Lieber & Hanspeter Wieland & Anke Schaffartzik & Fridolin Krausmann & S, 2018. "Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 827-838, August.
    24. Chazel, Simon & Bernard, Sophie & Benchekroun, Hassan, 2023. "Energy transition under mineral constraints and recycling: A low-carbon supply peak," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    25. Stephen H. Levine, 1999. "Products and Ecological Models: A Population Ecology Perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 3(2‐3), pages 47-62, April.
    26. Bretschger, Lucas, 2005. "Economics of technological change and the natural environment: How effective are innovations as a remedy for resource scarcity?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 148-163, August.
    27. Arunima Malik & Darian McBain & Thomas O. Wiedmann & Manfred Lenzen & Joy Murray, 2019. "Advancements in Input‐Output Models and Indicators for Consumption‐Based Accounting," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(2), pages 300-312, April.
    28. Kasulaitis, Barbara V. & Babbitt, Callie W. & Kahhat, Ramzy & Williams, Eric & Ryen, Erinn G., 2015. "Evolving materials, attributes, and functionality in consumer electronics: Case study of laptop computers," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-10.
    29. Alex Coad & Paul Nightingale & Jack Stilgoe & Antonio Vezzani, 2021. "Editorial: the dark side of innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 102-112, January.
    30. de Koning, Arjan & Bruckner, Martin & Lutter, Stephan & Wood, Richard & Stadler, Konstantin & Tukker, Arnold, 2015. "Effect of aggregation and disaggregation on embodied material use of products in input–output analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 289-299.
    31. Cucchiella, Federica & D’Adamo, Idiano & Lenny Koh, S.C. & Rosa, Paolo, 2015. "Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 263-272.
    32. Emily Anthes, 2017. "The shape of work to come," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 316-319, October.
    33. Cédric Gossart, 2015. "Rebound effects and ICT : a review of the literature," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01258112, HAL.
    34. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Guido Schmidt-Traub & Mariana Mazzucato & Dirk Messner & Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Johan Rockström, 2019. "Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 805-814, September.
    35. Andersson, Magnus & Ljunggren Söderman, Maria & Sandén, Björn A., 2019. "Challenges of recycling multiple scarce metals: The case of Swedish ELV and WEEE recycling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    36. Carlota Perez, 2014. "A Green and Socially Equitable Direction for the ICT Paradigm," Globelics Working Paper Series 2014-01, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    37. Davide Antonioli & Grazia Cecere & Massimiliano Mazzanti, 2018. "Information communication technologies and environmental innovations in firms: joint adoptions and productivity effects," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(11), pages 1905-1933, September.
    38. Bergek, Anna & Jacobsson, Staffan & Carlsson, Bo & Lindmark, Sven & Rickne, Annika, 2008. "Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 407-429, April.
    39. Lutter, Stephan & Giljum, Stefan & Bruckner, Martin, 2016. "A review and comparative assessment of existing approaches to calculate material footprints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-10.
    40. Bookhagen, B. & Bastian, D. & Buchholz, P. & Faulstich, M. & Opper, C. & Irrgeher, J. & Prohaska, T. & Koeberl, C., 2020. "Metallic resources in smartphones," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    41. Pierre Gaffuri & Elena Stolyarova & Daniel Llerena & Estelle Appert & Marianne Consonni & Stéphane Robin & Vincent Consonni, 2021. "Potential substitutes for critical materials in white LEDs: Technological challenges and market opportunities," Post-Print hal-03177349, HAL.
    42. Giachetti, Claudio & Marchi, Gianluca, 2017. "Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry: The role of windows of opportunity and firms’ competitive action," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 352-364.
    43. Cecere, Grazia & Martinelli, Arianna, 2017. "Drivers of knowledge accumulation in electronic waste management: An analysis of publication data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 925-938.
    44. Priore, Riccardo & Compagnoni, Marco & Favot, Marinella, 2025. "Innovation in rare earths recycling: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of patent data," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    45. Przemyslaw Kowalski & Clarisse Legendre, 2023. "Raw materials critical for the green transition: Production, international trade and export restrictions," OECD Trade Policy Papers 269, OECD Publishing.
    46. Marisa D. M. Vieira & Thomas C. Ponsioen & Mark J. Goedkoop & Mark A. J. Huijbregts, 2017. "Surplus Ore Potential as a Scarcity Indicator for Resource Extraction," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(2), pages 381-390, April.
    47. Barbara Kasulaitis & Callie W. Babbitt & Anna Christina Tyler, 2021. "The role of consumer preferences in reducing material intensity of electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 435-447, April.
    48. Shigetomi, Yosuke & Nansai, Keisuke & Kagawa, Shigemi & Tohno, Susumu, 2015. "Trends in Japanese households' critical-metals material footprints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 118-126.
    49. Partha Dasgupta & Geoffrey Heal, 1974. "The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 41(5), pages 3-28.
    50. Barbara V. Kasulaitis & Callie W. Babbitt & Andrew K. Krock, 2019. "Dematerialization and the Circular Economy: Comparing Strategies to Reduce Material Impacts of the Consumer Electronic Product Ecosystem," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 119-132, February.
    51. Kerschner, Christian & Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich, 2016. "A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 139-151.
    52. Boons, Frank & Wagner, Marcus, 2009. "Assessing the relationship between economic and ecological performance: Distinguishing system levels and the role of innovation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1908-1914, May.
    53. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    54. Diemer, Andreas & Iammarino, Simona & Perkins, Richard & Gros, Axel, 2022. "Technology, resources and geography in a paradigm shift: the case of critical and conflict materials in ICTs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115103, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    55. Peterson, Garry, 2000. "Political ecology and ecological resilience:: An integration of human and ecological dynamics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 323-336, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Priore, Riccardo & Compagnoni, Marco & Favot, Marinella, 2025. "Innovation in rare earths recycling: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of patent data," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Tilman Santarius & Johanna Pohl & Steffen Lange, 2020. "Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Dorothée Charlier & Florian Fizaine, 2020. "Does Becoming Richer Lead to a Reduction in Natural Resource Consumption? An Empirical Refutation of the Kuznets Material Curve," Working Papers 2020.05, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    4. Li, George Yunxiong & Ascani, Andrea & Iammarino, Simona, 2024. "The material basis of modern technologies. A case study on rare metals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    5. Pothen, Frank & Tovar Reaños, Miguel Angel, 2018. "The Distribution of Material Footprints in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 237-251.
    6. Ahmadova, Gozal & Delgado-Márquez, Blanca L. & Pedauga, Luis E. & Leyva-de la Hiz, Dante I., 2022. "Too good to be true: The inverted U-shaped relationship between home-country digitalization and environmental performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Di Maria, Corrado & Valente, Simone, 2006. "The Direction of Technical Change in Capital-Resource Economies," MPRA Paper 1040, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. John Boyce, "undated". "Biased Technological Change and the Relative Abundance of Natural Resources," Working Papers 2013-04, Department of Economics, University of Calgary.
    9. Nelli, Linnea & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2025. "A Twin Transition or a Policy Flagship? Emergent Constellations and Dominant Blocks in Green and Digital Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 17779, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Panchal, Rohit & Singh, Anju & Diwan, Hema, 2021. "Economic potential of recycling e-waste in India and its impact on import of materials," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. George Yunxiong Li & Simona Iammarino, 2024. "Critical Raw Materials and Renewable Energy Transition: The Role of Domestic Supply," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2403, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2024.
    12. Papachristos, George & Adamides, Emmanuel, 2016. "A retroductive systems-based methodology for socio-technical transitions research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2018. "Digitális átalakulás és fenntarthatóság. A technológiaoptimista környezetgazdászok és a pesszimista ökológiai közgazdászok közötti vita újraindítása [Digital transformation and environmental sustai," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1067-1088.
    14. Bergmann, Tobias & Kalkuhl, Matthias, 2025. "Decoupling economic growth from energy use: The role of energy intensity in an endogenous growth model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Li, Xinyi & Zhang, Chao & Yang, Xue & Xia, Ziqian & Cao, Zhi & Wang, Peng & Wang, Heming & Wang, Tao & Liu, Gang & Chen, Wei-Qiang, 2025. "Hybrid multi-stage steel footprinting unveils a more interdependent material foundation of the global economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Li, Xiang & Lepour, Dorsan & Heymann, Fabian & Maréchal, François, 2023. "Electrification and digitalization effects on sectoral energy demand and consumption: A prospective study towards 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    17. Karlilar, Selin & Balcilar, Mehmet & Emir, Firat, 2023. "Environmental sustainability in the OECD: The power of digitalization, green innovation, renewable energy and financial development," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    18. Nicolas Moreau & Thibault Pirson & Grégoire Le Brun & Thibault Delhaye & Georgiana Sandu & Antoine Paris & David Bol & Jean-Pierre Raskin, 2021. "Could Unsustainable Electronics Support Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-7, June.
    19. Francesco de Cunzo & Aurelio Patelli & Angelica Sbardella & Andrea Tacchella, 2025. "The Functional Role of Critical Raw Materials in Technological Innovation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2516, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2025.
    20. Gong, Huiwen & Andersen, Allan Dahl, 2024. "The role of material resources for rapid technology diffusion in net-zero transitions: Insights from EV lithium-ion battery Technological Innovation System in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:235:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925001132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.