IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/2516.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Functional Role of Critical Raw Materials in Technological Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco de Cunzo
  • Aurelio Patelli
  • Angelica Sbardella
  • Andrea Tacchella

Abstract

This paper presents new evidence on how countries are innovating in response to the growing strategic importance of critical raw materials (CRMs). Using millions of patent abstracts from the PATSTAT database, we apply a large language model (LLM) to classify CRM-related inventions into four functional roles: use, refine, recycle, and remove. A fifth category, wrong, flags false positives and improves classification accuracy. This approach moves beyond simple patent counts by identifying the specific roles CRMs play in technological development, enabling a more nuanced view of innovation strategies. Our classification reveals a significant increase in CRM-related innovation over the past two decades, with notable variation across materials, functions, and countries. While use-related patents remain dominant, recent growth in recycle and remove functions points to a shifting emphasis on circularity. Geographically, China leads across all functions, while an upward trend in recycling activity is observed across several advanced economies. A panel data analysis reveals that innovation in refining, recycling, and removing CRMs is positively associated with innovation in their use, suggesting functional complementarities that can enable both technological progress and more sustainable material strategies. These findings have important implications for policy, highlighting the value of supporting functionally diverse CRM innovation, fostering international coordination, and adopting tools for real-time innovation monitoring. By combining text mining with AI-driven functional classification of patented inventions, this study offers a scalable method for tracking material-related innovation and informing policies aimed at sustainability and technological resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco de Cunzo & Aurelio Patelli & Angelica Sbardella & Andrea Tacchella, 2025. "The Functional Role of Critical Raw Materials in Technological Innovation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2516, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg2516.pdf
    File Function: Version June 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pommeret, Aude & Ricci, Francesco & Schubert, Katheline, 2022. "Critical raw materials for the energy transition," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Jason C.K. Lee & Zongguo Wen, 2017. "Rare Earths from Mines to Metals: Comparing Environmental Impacts from China's Main Production Pathways," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(5), pages 1277-1290, October.
    3. Li, George Yunxiong & Ascani, Andrea & Iammarino, Simona, 2024. "The material basis of modern technologies. A case study on rare metals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    4. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Dernis, Hélène & Guellec, Dominique & Picci, Lucio & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno, 2013. "The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 720-737.
    5. Sam Arts & Francesco Paolo Appio & Bart Looy, 2013. "Inventions shaping technological trajectories: do existing patent indicators provide a comprehensive picture?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 397-419, November.
    6. Nicolas Berman & Mathieu Couttenier & Dominic Rohner & Mathias Thoenig, 2017. "This Mine Is Mine! How Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1564-1610, June.
    7. Vikström, Hanna & Davidsson, Simon & Höök, Mikael, 2013. "Lithium availability and future production outlooks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 252-266.
    8. Gavin Harper & Roberto Sommerville & Emma Kendrick & Laura Driscoll & Peter Slater & Rustam Stolkin & Allan Walton & Paul Christensen & Oliver Heidrich & Simon Lambert & Andrew Abbott & Karl Ryder & L, 2019. "Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 75-86, November.
    9. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Matthieu Glachant & Ivan Haščič & Nick Johnstone & Yann Ménière, 2011. "Invention and Transfer of Climate Change--Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(1), pages 109-130, Winter.
    10. Sisi Que & Liang Wang & Kwame Awuah-Offei & Yao Chen & Wei Yang, 2018. "The Status of the Local Community in Mining Sustainable Development beyond the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, May.
    11. Jean O. Lanjouw & Ariel Pakes & Jonathan Putnam, 1998. "How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: The Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 405-432, December.
    12. Wang, Shuang & Yang, Lihong, 2024. "Mineral resource extraction and resource sustainability: Policy initiatives for agriculture, economy, energy, and the environment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Mancini, Lucia & Eslava, Nicolas A. & Traverso, Marzia & Mathieux, Fabrice, 2021. "Assessing impacts of responsible sourcing initiatives for cobalt: Insights from a case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Anqi Zeng & Wu Chen & Kasper Dalgas Rasmussen & Xuehong Zhu & Maren Lundhaug & Daniel B. Müller & Juan Tan & Jakob K. Keiding & Litao Liu & Tao Dai & Anjian Wang & Gang Liu, 2022. "Battery technology and recycling alone will not save the electric mobility transition from future cobalt shortages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Hanjiro Ambrose & Alissa Kendall, 2020. "Understanding the future of lithium: Part 2, temporally and spatially resolved life‐cycle assessment modeling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(1), pages 90-100, February.
    16. Fusillo Fabrizio & Manera Maria & Orsatti Gianluca & Quatraro Francesco & Rentocchini Francesco, 2025. "The exposure of EU inventive efforts to critical raw materials: evidence from an AI based patent indicator," JRC Research Reports JRC141261, Joint Research Centre.
    17. repec:bla:jindec:v:46:y:1998:i:4:p:405-32 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Przemyslaw Kowalski & Clarisse Legendre, 2023. "Raw materials critical for the green transition: Production, international trade and export restrictions," OECD Trade Policy Papers 269, OECD Publishing.
    19. Yann Ménière & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Matthieu Glachant & Ivan Hascic & N. Johnstone, 2011. "Invention and transfer of climate change mitigation technologies: a study drawing on patent data," Post-Print hal-00869795, HAL.
    20. Grandell, Leena & Lehtilä, Antti & Kivinen, Mari & Koljonen, Tiina & Kihlman, Susanna & Lauri, Laura S., 2016. "Role of critical metals in the future markets of clean energy technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 53-62.
    21. Jan Mertens & Jo Dewulf & Christian Breyer & Ronnie Belmans & Corinne Gendron & Patrice Geoffron & Luc Goossens & Carolyn Fischer & Elodie Fornel & Katharine Hayhoe & Katsu Hirose & Elodie Cadre-Loret, 2024. "From emissions to resources: mitigating the critical raw material supply chain vulnerability of renewable energy technologies," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(3), pages 669-676, September.
    22. Conde, Marta, 2017. "Resistance to Mining. A Review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 80-90.
    23. Junne, Tobias & Wulff, Niklas & Breyer, Christian & Naegler, Tobias, 2020. "Critical materials in global low-carbon energy scenarios: The case for neodymium, dysprosium, lithium, and cobalt," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    24. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Matthieu Glachant & Ivan Haščič & Nick Johnstone & Yann Ménière, 2011. "Invention and Transfer of Climate Change--Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(1), pages 109-130, Winter.
    25. Diemer, Andreas & Iammarino, Simona & Perkins, Richard & Gros, Axel, 2022. "Technology, resources and geography in a paradigm shift: the case of critical and conflict materials in ICTs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115103, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dunbar, Kwamie & Owusu-Amoako, Johnson & Treku, Daniel N., 2024. "Unveiling the Nexus: Carbon finance and climate technology advancements," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    2. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Yann Ménière & Myra Mohnen, 2017. "International patent families: from application strategies to statistical indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 793-828, May.
    3. Bernardo Caldarola & Dario Mazzilli & Lorenzo Napolitano & Aurelio Patelli & Angelica Sbardella, 2023. "Economic complexity and the sustainability transition: A review of data, methods, and literature," Papers 2308.07172, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    4. Bruns, Stephan B. & Kalthaus, Martin, 2020. "Flexibility in the selection of patent counts: Implications for p-hacking and evidence-based policymaking," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Francesco de Cunzo & Davide Consoli & Francois Perruchas & Angelica Sbardella, 2023. "Mapping Critical Raw Materials in Green Technologies," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2322, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2023.
    6. Costantini, Valeria & Crespi, Francesco & Palma, Alessandro, 2017. "Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 799-819.
    7. Patricia Laurens & Christian Bas & Antoine Schoen & Stéphane Lhuillery, 2016. "Technological contribution of MNEs to the growth of energy-greentech sector in the early post-Kyoto period," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(2), pages 169-191, April.
    8. Benedict Probst & Simon Touboul & Matthieu Glachant & Antoine Dechezleprêtre, 2021. "Global trends in the invention and diffusion of climate change mitigation technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1077-1086, November.
    9. Ribeiro, Beatriz Couto & Ferrero, Luciane Graziele Pereira & Bin, Adriana & Blind, Knut, 2023. "Effects of innovation stimuli regulation in the electricity sector: A quantitative study on European countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. David Popp, 2019. "Environmental policy and innovation: a decade of research," CESifo Working Paper Series 7544, CESifo.
    11. Carolina Castaldi, 2025. "Mapping innovation in space," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2505, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2025.
    12. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Hayashi, Daisuke & Huenteler, Joern & Lewis, Joanna I., 2018. "Gone with the wind: A learning curve analysis of China's wind power industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 38-51.
    15. Jingbo Cui & Zhenxuan Wang & Haishan Yu, 2022. "Can International Climate Cooperation Induce Knowledge Spillover to Developing Countries? Evidence from CDM," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(4), pages 923-951, August.
    16. Zhongju Liao & Xiang Zhu, 2022. "A configurational analysis of firms' environmental innovation: Evidence from China's key pollutant‐discharge listed companies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1511-1522, December.
    17. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Ben Amor & Pierre Blanchet, 2018. "Evaluating the Link between Low Carbon Reductions Strategies and Its Performance in the Context of Climate Change: A Carbon Footprint of a Wood-Frame Residential Building in Quebec, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Solmaria Halleck Vega & Antoine Mandel, 2017. "A network-based approach to technology transfers in the context of climate policy," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17009, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    19. Cui, Jingbo & Liu, Xi & Sun, Yongping & Yu, Haishan, 2020. "Can CDM projects trigger host countries’ innovation in renewable energy? Evidence of firm-level dataset from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Hémous, David & Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Olsen, Morten & Zanella, carlo, 2019. "Automating Labor: Evidence from Firm-level Patent Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 14249, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deguunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.