IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v85y2025icp592-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market integration and corporate participation in rural revitalization empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Siming
  • Long, Jianhong
  • Jian, Xie
  • Yajun, Fang
  • Tuanjie, Zhao
  • Fang, Wei

Abstract

Based on the financial data of A-share listed companies in China from 2016 to 2020, this study examines the impact of market integration on corporate participation in rural revitalization and its mechanisms. The findings indicate that market integration significantly enhances corporate enthusiasm for participating in rural revitalization. The mechanism tests show that market integration primarily promotes corporate participation in rural revitalization by facilitating labor mobility and alleviating financing constraints for enterprises. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effects are more pronounced among enterprises in the eastern region, state-owned enterprises, and those registered in non-poverty areas. Thus, further advancement of market integration is advocated to promote corporate participation in rural revitalization through enhancing labor mobility and easing financing constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Siming & Long, Jianhong & Jian, Xie & Yajun, Fang & Tuanjie, Zhao & Fang, Wei, 2025. "Market integration and corporate participation in rural revitalization empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 592-606.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:592-606
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.12.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624003618
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2024.12.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:592-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.