IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aumajo/v19y2011i4p238-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users

Author

Listed:
  • Haverila, Matti

Abstract

Despite the fact that there is a plethora of research regarding the mobile phone feature preferences, there appears to be lack of research regarding the relationship between the feature preferences and their relationship between customer satisfaction and repurchase intent. Therefore the objective of this research is to investigate the mobile phone feature preferences among male respondents in Finland. In conjunction with this the conceptualization of the feature preferences is studied as well as their relationship to customer satisfaction and repurchase intent of the mobile phone. The results indicate that battery/talk time is the most important feature for the respondents. The respondents perceive there to be six logical factors among the feature preferences as follows: business functionality, support functions, aesthetics+design, parts+processes, solidity, and tones+games. The first three correlate with customer satisfaction, and only the business functionality factor correlates with repurchase intent. Finally the relationship between customer satisfaction and repurchase intent is investigated, and comparisons to similar studies are made. Limitations and managerial implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Haverila, Matti, 2011. "Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 238-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:19:y:2011:i:4:p:238-246
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441358211000462
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Mukherjee, Ashesh & Hoyer, Wayne D, 2001. "The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 462-472, December.
    3. Shimp, Terence A & Bearden, William O, 1982. "Warranty and Other Extrinsic Cue Effects on Consumers' Risk Perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(1), pages 38-46, June.
    4. Neeru Sharma & Satinder Ojha *, 2004. "Measuring service performance in mobile communications," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 109-128, November.
    5. Tseng, Fang-Mei & Lo, Hui-Yi, 2011. "Antecedents of consumers' intentions to upgrade their mobile phones," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 74-86, February.
    6. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. "Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    7. Rao, Akshay R & Monroe, Kent B, 1988. "The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 253-264, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Zhang & Huguang Rao & Junzheng Feng, 2018. "Product innovation based on online review data mining: a case study of Huawei phones," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 3-22, March.
    2. Hanen Khanchel & Karim Ben Kahla, 2019. "Job Dissatisfaction and Turnover Crises in Tunisia," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(3), pages 53-73, September.
    3. Kumar, Anil & Luthra, Sunil & Khandelwal, Dinesh Kumar & Mehta, Rajneesh & Chaudhary, Nityanand & Bhatia, Sukhdev, 2017. "Measuring and improving customer retention at authorised automobile workshops after free services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 93-102.
    4. Kanupriya Katyal & Vinay Kanetkar & Sanjay Patro, 2019. "What is a fair fare? Exploring the differences between perceived price fairness and perceived price unfairness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 133-146, April.
    5. Andy Fred Wali, 2018. "Customer Relationship Management and Marketing Effectiveness," Paradigm, , vol. 22(2), pages 101-124, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Shaw, W. Douglass & Silva, Andres, 2006. "The Effect of Risk Presentation on Product Valuation: An Experimental Analysis," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21429, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Stock, Carolin & Gierl, Heribert, 2015. "It’s a consumer’s idea, you must like it: The efficacy of created-by-consumer cues in market communication," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(4), pages 371-395.
    3. M. Mercanti-Guerin, 2008. "Perception d'une annonce créative par le consommateur: construction d'une échelle de mesure et impact sur le processus de persuasion publicitaire," Post-Print hal-02054971, HAL.
    4. Orlowski, Marissa & Lefebvre, Sarah & Back, Robin M., 2022. "Thinking outside the bottle: Effects of alternative wine packaging," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Vera Herédia-Colaço & Rita Coelho do Vale & Sofia B. Villas-Boas, 2019. "Does Fair Trade Breed Contempt? A Cross-Country Examination on the Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity and Consumer Expertise on Product Evaluation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 737-758, May.
    6. Pontes, Nicolas & Palmeira, Mauricio & Jevons, Colin, 2017. "Brand expertise and perceived consistency reversals on vertical line extensions: The moderating role of extension direction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 209-218.
    7. Lei, Jing & de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 2008. "Consumer Responses to Vertical Service Line Extensions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 268-280.
    8. Desai, Kalpesh Kaushik & Mahajan, Vijay, 1998. "Strategic Role of Affect-Based Attitudes in the Acquisition, Development, and Retention of Customers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 309-324, July.
    9. Ya-Hui Wang, 2017. "Are Investors Willing to Buy Non-award-wining Funds from Awarded Fund Companies?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4.
    10. Fetai Besnik & Sadiku-Dushi Nora & Ismaili Raman, 2017. "Measuring the Impact of Extrinsic Cues on Consumers’ Purchasing Decision for Food Products," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 62(3), pages 33-46, December.
    11. Ana B. Casado-Díaz & Leonor M. Pérez-Naranjo & Ricardo Sellers-Rubio, 2017. "Aggregate consumer ratings and booking intention: the role of brand image," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(3), pages 543-562, September.
    12. Kavita Sharma & Shivani Garg, 2016. "An Investigation into Consumer Search and Evaluation Behaviour: Effect of Brand Name and Price Perceptions," Vision, , vol. 20(1), pages 24-36, March.
    13. Racat, Margot & Capelli, Sonia & Lichy, Jessica, 2021. "New insights into ‘technologies of touch’: Information processing in product evaluation and purchase intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Besharat, Ali & Langan, Ryan J. & Nguyen, Carlin A., 2016. "Fashionably late: Strategies for competing against a pioneer advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 718-725.
    15. Raf Buyle & Mathias Van Compernolle & Eveline Vlassenroot & Ziggy Vanlishout & Peter Mechant & Erik Mannens, 2018. "“Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model” as a Predictor for the Use Intention of Data Standards in Smart Cities," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 127-139.
    16. Nga N. Ho-Dac & Minu Kumar & Rebecca J. Slotegraaf, 2020. "Using product development information to spur the adoption of continuous improvement products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1156-1173, November.
    17. Sarah Clemente & Eric Dolansky & Antonia Mantonakis & Katherine White, 2014. "The effects of perceived product-extrinsic cue incongruity on consumption experiences: The case of celebrity sponsorship," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 373-384, December.
    18. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    19. Francisco B. Galarza & Gabriella Wong, 2017. "The Impact of Price Information on Consumer Behavior: An Experiment," Working Papers 106, Peruvian Economic Association.
    20. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:19:y:2011:i:4:p:238-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/australasian-marketing-journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.