IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v16y1951i3p297-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Cronbach

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:16:y:1951:i:3:p:297-334
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02310555
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis Guttman, 1945. "A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(4), pages 255-282, December.
    2. George Ferguson, 1941. "The factorial interpretation of test difficulty," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 6(5), pages 323-329, October.
    3. J. Guilford & William Michael, 1950. "Changes in common-factor loadings as tests are altered homogeneously in length," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 15(3), pages 237-249, September.
    4. Truman Kelley, 1942. "The reliability coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 7(2), pages 75-83, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1947. "Test “reliability”: Its meaning and determination," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Anne-Catherine Guio & David Gordon & Eric Marlier & Hector Najera & Marco Pomati, 2018. "Towards an EU measure of child deprivation," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(3), pages 835-860, June.
    3. Jake Olivier & Melanie L Bell, 2013. "Effect Sizes for 2×2 Contingency Tables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, March.
    4. Klaas Sijtsma, 2012. "Future of Psychometrics: Ask What Psychometrics Can Do for Psychology," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 4-20, January.
    5. Jules Ellis & Brian Junker, 1997. "Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 495-523, December.
    6. Jos Berge & Tom Snijders & Frits Zegers, 1981. "Computational aspects of the greatest lower bound to the reliability and constrained minimum trace factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(2), pages 201-213, June.
    7. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2002. "On robusiness of the normal-theory based asymptotic distributions of three reliability coefficient estimates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 251-259, June.
    8. Jos Berge & Gregor Sočan, 2004. "The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 613-625, December.
    9. Karl Schweizer & Siegbert Reiß, 2019. "On the Contextual Conditions Driving a Difficulty Factor," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, September.
    10. W. Nicewander, 1990. "A latent-trait based reliability estimate and upper bound," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 65-74, March.
    11. Harold Gulliksen, 1945. "The relation of item difficulty and inter-item correlation to test variance and reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(2), pages 79-91, June.
    12. Mary F. Zhang & Julie Selwyn, 2020. "The Subjective Well-Being of Children and Young People in out of Home Care: Psychometric Analyses of the “Your Life, your Care” Survey," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1549-1572, October.
    13. John Cotton & Donald Campbell & R. Malone, 1957. "The relationship between factorial composition of test items and measures of test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 22(4), pages 347-357, December.
    14. Stephen Schilling & R. Bock, 2005. "High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 533-555, September.
    15. Wang, Selena & De Boeck, Paul, 2020. "When high reliability does not signal reliable detection of experimental effects," OSF Preprints gz8pw, Center for Open Science.
    16. W. Gibson, 1960. "Nonlinear factors in two dimensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 25(4), pages 381-392, December.
    17. Mary F. Zhang & Julie Selwyn, 0. "The Subjective Well-Being of Children and Young People in out of Home Care: Psychometric Analyses of the “Your Life, your Care” Survey," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    18. Paul Horst, 1954. "The maximum expected correlation between two multiple-choice tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(4), pages 291-296, December.
    19. Tsjitske M Haanstra & Claire Tilbury & Steven J Kamper & Rutger L Tordoir & Thea P M Vliet Vlieland & Rob G H H Nelissen & Pim Cuijpers & Henrica C W de Vet & Joost Dekker & Dirk L Knol & Raymond W Os, 2015. "Can Optimism, Pessimism, Hope, Treatment Credibility and Treatment Expectancy Be Distinguished in Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Matthijs J. Warrens, 2016. "A comparison of reliability coefficients for psychometric tests that consist of two parts," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(1), pages 71-84, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:16:y:1951:i:3:p:297-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.