IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2018i5p268-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget Deficits, Public Debt and Irregular Receipts: Kosovo case

Author

Listed:
  • Lutfi Zharku

    () (University “Kadri Zeka” Gjilan)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is analyze the impact of irregular receipts (one-time receipts such as dividends from public companies and privatization proceeds) in budget deficits that are partially financed by public debt (internal and external) in Kosovo. Kosovo is experiencing both a budget deficit and public debt burden, so it is important to analyze the very beginnings of these tendencies. There is extensive literature on the causes of a budget deficit, its definition and measurement. The literature review method is adopted for this study, and research is refined by including empirical and theoretical studies of budget deficits and public debts. Using this line of reasoning, we have defined and measured special-purpose deficits, so-called “regular” budget deficits that consider only regular receipts and outlays. This analysis leads to the conclusion that irregular receipts used by government to engage in large infrastructure projects and/or politically motivated increases of wage and salary bills and social transfers created future liabilities that had to be financed through public debt. This is a case study of Kosovo. Research has been carried out using primary data drawn from Kosovo’s annual financial reports and annual bulletins on public debt. Budget deficits in Kosovo are results of continuous outlays based on initially high cash balances and irregular receipts that could not be met later by regular receipts. All this was supported by lack of legal infrastructure or fiscal rules for several years. The implications of this paper will be of high importance for policy-makers and academics. This is a unique approach to the issues of Kosovo's budget deficit and debt.

Suggested Citation

  • Lutfi Zharku, 2018. "Budget Deficits, Public Debt and Irregular Receipts: Kosovo case," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 14(5), pages 268-285, OCTOBER.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2018:i:5:p:268-285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/4777/4596
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salih BARIŞIK & Abdullah BARIS, 2017. "Impact of governance on budget deficit in developing countries," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(611), S), pages 111-130, Summer.
    2. Aschauer, David Alan, 1989. "Is public expenditure productive?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 177-200, March.
    3. Martin Fukač & Robert Kirkby, 2017. "Accounting for Uncertainty in Public Debt Targets," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 50(1), pages 89-102, March.
    4. Hamilton, James D & Flavin, Marjorie A, 1986. "On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: A Framework for EmpiricalTesting," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 808-819, September.
    5. Davina Jacobs & Nj Schoeman & Jh Van Heerden, 2002. "Alternative Definitions of the Budget Deficit and its Impact on the Sustainability of Fiscal Policy in South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 70(3), pages 251-257, March.
    6. Alberto Alesina & Roberto Perotti, 1994. "The Political Economy of Budget Deficits," NBER Working Papers 4637, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Fischer, Stanley & Easterly, William, 1990. "The Economic of the Government Budget Constraint," World Bank Research Observer, World Bank Group, vol. 5(2), pages 127-142, July.
    8. Badinger, Harald & Reuter, Wolf Heinrich, 2017. "The case for fiscal rules," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 334-343.
    9. Heinemann, Friedrich & Moessinger, Marc-Daniel & Yeter, Mustafa, 2018. "Do fiscal rules constrain fiscal policy? A meta-regression-analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 69-92.
    10. James M. Poterba, 1996. "Do Budget Rules Work?," NBER Working Papers 5550, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Groneck, Max, 2010. "A golden rule of public finance or a fixed deficit regime?: Growth and welfare effects of budget rules," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 523-534, March.
    12. Timothy C. Irwin, 2015. "Defining The Government'S Debt And Deficit," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 711-732, September.
    13. Zsoka Koczan, 2015. "Fiscal Deficit and Public Debt in the Western Balkans; 15 Years of Economic Transition," IMF Working Papers 15/172, International Monetary Fund.
    14. Guerguil, Martine & Mandon, Pierre & Tapsoba, René, 2017. "Flexible fiscal rules and countercyclical fiscal policy," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 189-220.
    15. Eisner, Robert, 1989. "Budget Deficits: Rhetoric and Reality," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 73-93, Spring.
    16. Robert A.J. Dur & Ben D. Peletier & Otto H. Swank, 1997. "The Effect of Fiscal Rules on Public Investment if Budget Deficits are Politically Motivated," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97-125/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    17. Blejer, Mario I & Cheasty, Adrienne, 1991. "The Measurement of Fiscal Deficits: Analytical and Methodological Issues," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 29(4), pages 1644-1678, December.
    18. Shi, Min & Svensson, Jakob, 2006. "Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(8-9), pages 1367-1389, September.
    19. Simon Luechinger & Christoph Schaltegger, 2013. "Fiscal rules, budget deficits and budget projections," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(5), pages 785-807, October.
    20. Bernheim, B Douglas, 1989. "A Neoclassical Perspective on Budget Deficits," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 55-72, Spring.
    21. Adam, Christopher S. & Bevan, David L., 2005. "Fiscal deficits and growth in developing countries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 571-597, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2018:i:5:p:268-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Daniela Robu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.