IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v72y2019i10p16-19.html

Wunsch und Wirklichkeit – die langfristige Klimastrategie der Europäischen Union

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Pittel

Abstract

Aktuellen Schätzungen zufolge könnte die EU ihr Klimaziel von 30% Emissionsminderung bis 2020 erreichen. Um allerdings Treibhausgasneutralität bis 2050 zu erreichen, müssen weitere Maßnahmen ergriffen werden. Notwendig ist eine umfassende Bepreisung von Treibhausgasemissionen der bisher nicht vom EU-Emissionshandelssystem erfassten Emissionen und negative Emissionen, die aus der Schaffung von CO2-Senken oder dem Einsatz von CCS-Technologien zur CO2-Abscheidung und -Speicherung resultieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Pittel, 2019. "Wunsch und Wirklichkeit – die langfristige Klimastrategie der Europäischen Union," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(10), pages 16-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:10:p:16-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2019-10-pittel-klimastrategie-2019-05-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & William Kerr, 2016. "Transition to Clean Technology," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 52-104.
    2. Christoph Weissbart, 2018. "Decarbonization of Power Markets under Stability and Fairness: Do They Influence Efficiency?," ifo Working Paper Series 270, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ann-Christin Rathje, 2019. "Wie soll die Wirtschaftspolitik der Europäischen Union zukünftig aussehen? – Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(23), pages 27-35, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burda, Michael C. & Zessner-Spitzenberg, Leopold, 2024. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Price-Driven Growth in a Solow-Swan Economy with an Environmental Limit," IZA Discussion Papers 16771, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Rik Rozendaal, 2025. "Market Power, Innovation, and the Green Transition," CESifo Working Paper Series 11938, CESifo.
    3. Camacho, Carmen & Hassan, Waleed, 2023. "The dynamics of revolution: Discrimination, social unrest and the optimal timing of revolution," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Ferrari Minesso, Massimo & Pagliari, Maria Sole, 2023. "No country is an island. International cooperation and climate change," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Galina Besstremyannaya & Richard Dasher & Sergei Golovan, 2017. "Technological change, energy, environment and economic growth in Japan," Working Papers w0245, New Economic School (NES).
    6. Lamberova, Natalia, 2021. "The puzzling politics of R&D: Signaling competence through risky projects," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 801-818.
    7. Georgii Riabov & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2021. "Policy with stochastic hysteresis," Papers 2104.10225, arXiv.org.
    8. Frank W. Geels & Jonatan Pinkse & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2021. "Productivity opportunities and risks in a transformative,low-carbon and digital age," Working Papers 009, The Productivity Institute.
    9. Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2023. "What Happened to US Business Dynamism?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(8), pages 2059-2124.
    10. Elizabeth Baldwin & Yongyang Cai & Karlygash Kuralbayeva, 2018. "To Build or Not to Build? Capital Stocks and Climate Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 6884, CESifo.
    11. Zhangsheng Liu & Liuqingqing Yang & Liqin Fan, 2021. "Induced Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation: Evidence from the Increasing-Block Pricing Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Jeffrey Wagner & Zachary Grzelka, 2024. "Constellation IP and environmental quality," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. de Haas, Ralph & Popov, A., 2018. "Financial Development and Industrial Pollution," Other publications TiSEM a0a4fb82-734a-442a-9ea1-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Tommaso Oliviero & Sandro Rondinella & Alberto Zazzaro, 2024. "Are green firms more financially constrained? The sensitivity of investment to cash flow," CSEF Working Papers 700, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    15. Xueying Yuan & Lixia Shang & Jinhua Xu, 2024. "Green Financial Policy, Resource Allocation and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, July.
    16. Xu, Qi & Liu, Kui, 2024. "Hero or Devil: A comparison of different carbon tax policies for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    17. René Aïd & Matteo Basei & Huyên Pham, 2017. "The coordination of centralised and distributed generation," Working Papers hal-01517165, HAL.
    18. Liu, Menghe & Li, Yuxiao, 2022. "Environmental regulation and green innovation: Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    19. David A Keiser & Joseph S Shapiro, 2019. "Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(1), pages 349-396.
    20. Zhe Xu & Ying Wang & Xiaoliang Shi & Yingying Qiu & Chunzi Su & Dan He, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Subsidies and Enforcement on Green Innovation: Evidence from Heavy-Polluting Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:10:p:16-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.