IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v42y2021i11p2162-2191.html

The effects of board expertise‐risk misalignment and subsequent strategic board reconfiguration on firm performance

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Schnatterly
  • Felipe Calvano
  • John P. Berns
  • Chaoqun Deng

Abstract

Research Summary Boards are unlikely to be effective if they do not have sufficient collective expertise to understand, monitor, and address future risks. This begs the question, does the board, in fact, have this expertise? If not, can they reconfigure their expertise to address those risks? Building on agency theory, we analyze the alignment between the board's expertise and the firm's future risks, with the expectation that board composition will change over time to reflect the firm's future risks—strategic reconfiguration. Our results show that misalignment has negative implications for firm performance, misalignment also motivates appropriate board reconfiguration, and that this reconfiguration positively effects firm performance. Managerial Summary Our study illustrates the need for board expertise to be aligned with firm risks. While there has been increasing pressure for firms to assess their directors' expertise (i.e., skill matrices), simply identifying expertise which is present or absent does not speak to whether that expertise is actually needed (or not) by the firm given the risks faced. We analyze boards' collective expertise, compare that with the risks that firms are facing, and identify the gaps which may detrimentally impact the monitoring ability of the board and cause firm performance to suffer. Consequently, understanding the degree of (mis)alignment is of paramount importance for boards to be effective monitors and positively influence firm performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Schnatterly & Felipe Calvano & John P. Berns & Chaoqun Deng, 2021. "The effects of board expertise‐risk misalignment and subsequent strategic board reconfiguration on firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(11), pages 2162-2191, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:42:y:2021:i:11:p:2162-2191
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.3291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3291
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.3291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James H. Stock & Motohiro Yogo, 2002. "Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression," NBER Technical Working Papers 0284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Emilie R. Feldman & Cynthia A. Montgomery, 2015. "Are incentives without expertise sufficient? Evidence from fortune 500 firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 113-122, January.
    3. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    4. Tang Wang & Vikas A. Aggarwal & Brian Wu, 2020. "Capability interactions and adaptation to demand‐side change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9), pages 1595-1627, September.
    5. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    6. Minton, Bernadette A. & Taillard, Jérôme P. & Williamson, Rohan, 2014. "Financial Expertise of the Board, Risk Taking, and Performance: Evidence from Bank Holding Companies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 351-380, April.
    7. Michael L. Cook & Molly J. Burress, 2013. "The Impact of CEO Tenure on Cooperative Governance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3-5), pages 218-229, April.
    8. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    9. Stephen Gray & John Nowland, 2017. "The diversity of expertise on corporate boards in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(2), pages 429-463, June.
    10. Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna & Richardson, Vernon J. & Scholz, Susan, 2004. "Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 59-89, February.
    11. Sofia Larmou & Nikos Vafeas, 2010. "The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(1), pages 61-85, February.
    12. Narayanan Jayaraman & Ajay Khorana & Edward Nelling & Jeffrey Covin, 2000. "CEO founder status and firm financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(12), pages 1215-1224, December.
    13. Pamela Brandes & Ravi Dharwadkar & Sanghyun Suh, 2016. "I know something you don't know!: The role of linking pin directors in monitoring and incentive alignment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 964-981, May.
    14. Mark Kroll & Bruce A. Walters & Peter Wright, 2008. "Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 363-382, April.
    15. Eliezer M. Fich, 2005. "Are Some Outside Directors Better than Others? Evidence from Director Appointments by Fortune 1000 Firms," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(5), pages 1943-1972, September.
    16. Emanuele L. M. Bettinazzi & Maurizio Zollo, 2017. "Stakeholder Orientation and Acquisition Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(12), pages 2465-2485, December.
    17. Emanuele Luca Maria Bettinazzi & Maurizio Zollo, 2017. "Stakeholder orientation and acquisition performance," Post-Print hal-02312007, HAL.
    18. Amy J. Hillman & Albert A. Cannella & Ramona L. Paetzold, 2000. "The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 235-256, March.
    19. Agrawal, Anup & Chadha, Sahiba, 2005. "Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 371-406, October.
    20. Jana Oehmichen & Sebastian Schrapp & Michael Wolff, 2017. "Who needs experts most? Board industry expertise and strategic change—a contingency perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 645-656, March.
    21. Renée B. Adams & Heitor Almeida & Daniel Ferreira, 2005. "Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1403-1432.
    22. Joanna Tochman Campbell & T. Colin Campbell & David G. Sirmon & Leonard Bierman & Christopher S. Tuggle, 2012. "Shareholder influence over director nomination via proxy access: Implications for agency conflict and stakeholder value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(12), pages 1431-1451, December.
    23. Glenn Hoetker & Thomas Mellewigt, 2009. "Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(10), pages 1025-1044, October.
    24. Mark L. Defond & Rebecca N. Hann & Xuesong Hu, 2005. "Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 153-193, May.
    25. Brian R. Golden & Edward J. Zajac, 2001. "When will boards influence strategy? inclination × power = strategic change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(12), pages 1087-1111, December.
    26. Jaepil Choi & Heli Wang, 2009. "Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 895-907, August.
    27. Olubunmi Faleye & Rani Hoitash & Udi Hoitash, 2018. "Industry expertise on corporate boards," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 441-479, February.
    28. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    29. Richard Clune & Dana R. Hermanson & James G. Tompkins & Zhongxia (Shelly) Ye, 2014. "The Nominating Committee Process: A Qualitative Examination of Board Independence and Formalization," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 748-786, September.
    30. Kalin D. Kolev & David B. Wangrow & Vincent L. Barker & Donald J. Schepker, 2019. "Board Committees in Corporate Governance: A Cross‐Disciplinary Review and Agenda for the Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1138-1193, September.
    31. Katalin Takacs Haynes & Amy Hillman, 2010. "The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(11), pages 1145-1163, November.
    32. James S. Linck & Jeffry M. Netter & Tina Yang, 2009. "The Effects and Unintended Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the Supply and Demand for Directors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(8), pages 3287-3328, August.
    33. Yang Bao & Anindya Datta, 2014. "Simultaneously Discovering and Quantifying Risk Types from Textual Risk Disclosures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1371-1391, June.
    34. Scott Johnson & Karen Schnatterly & Joel F. Bolton & Chris Tuggle, 2011. "Antecedents of New Director Social Capital," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(8), pages 1782-1803, December.
    35. Yasemin Y. Kor & Vilmos F. Misangyi, 2008. "Outside directors' industry‐specific experience and firms' liability of newness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(12), pages 1345-1355, December.
    36. Wei Shi & Yan Zhang & Robert E. Hoskisson, 2017. "Ripple Effects of CEO Awards: Investigating the Acquisition Activities of Superstar CEOs' Competitors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(10), pages 2080-2102, October.
    37. Irani, Rustom M. & Oesch, David, 2013. "Monitoring and corporate disclosure: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 398-418.
    38. Adams, Renée B. & Akyol, Ali C. & Verwijmeren, Patrick, 2018. "Director skill sets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 641-662.
    39. Catherine M. Daily & Dan R. Dalton, 1995. "CEO and director turnover in failing firms: An illusion of change?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 393-400.
    40. Autore, Don M. & Clarke, Nicholas & Liu, Baixiao, 2019. "Activist investors and open market share repurchases," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    41. Michael L. McDonald & James D. Westphal & Melissa E. Graebner, 2008. "What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(11), pages 1155-1177, November.
    42. Wintoki, M. Babajide & Linck, James S. & Netter, Jeffry M., 2012. "Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 581-606.
    43. Thomas Koenig & Robisrt Gogel & John Sonquist, 1979. "Models of the Significance of Interlocking Corporate Directorates," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 173-186, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Jinglu & Goodarzi, Soheil & Kahai, Surinder & Cameron, Ann-Frances, 2025. "Navigating the technology-tide: Mitigating the impact of technology-related political risks on firm innovativeness through strategic diversification and board technology competency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Jérémy Lévêque & Victor Acker & Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2025. "Dual Purpose Corporations and Boards Expertise - an Exploratory Study in French Société à Mission," Post-Print hal-04914415, HAL.
    3. Xavier Martin & Ilya R. P. Cuypers, 2024. "Heterogeneous adaptability: Learning, cash resources, and the fine‐grained adjustment of misaligned governance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 168-201, January.
    4. Wu, Weiwei & Li, Xue & Liu, Yexin & Kim, Yanggi, 2025. "Digital innovation as strategic response: How CEO with informal power deal with inconsistent performance feedback," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Dong, Dayong & Yang, Mo & Yang, Gaoju & Chen, Chang-Chih & Zhang, Xinyi, 2022. "Talk less and do more: Expected strategic adjustments vs. actual changes in the Chinese firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Yu, Shengjing & Zheng, Xiaolan & Liu, Martin J., 2025. "Board digital expertise and digital innovation: Evidence from commercial banks in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Linbing Sun & Tienan Wang & Liqing Tang & Qianqian Fan, 2025. "Firms’ Participation in Global Value Chains Research and Development Activities and Firm Performance: The Joint Moderating Effects of Knowledge Intensity and Technological Turbulence," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 7757-7780, June.
    8. Huang, Yujie & Zhang, Guoqing & Chen, Xiaofeng & Du, Kerui, 2025. "From awareness to action: The role of ESG committees in driving corporate ambidextrous green innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lerong He & Rong Yang & Yuanlong He, 2018. "Does social exchange relationship impair audit committee effectiveness?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(2), pages 219-249, June.
    2. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    3. Adams, Mike & Jiang, Wei, 2016. "Do outside directors influence the financial performance of risk-trading firms? Evidence from the United Kingdom (UK) insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 36-51.
    4. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, December.
    5. Tim Heubeck & Reinhard Meckl, 2024. "Does board composition matter for innovation? A longitudinal study of the organizational slack–innovation relationship in Nasdaq-100 companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 597-624, June.
    6. Upadhyay, Arun & Öztekin, Özde, 2021. "What matters more in board independence? Form or substance: Evidence from influential CEO-directors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Chenglong Zheng & Roy Kouwenberg, 2019. "A Bibliometric Review of Global Research on Corporate Governance and Board Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Shelby L. Gai & J. Yo‐Jud Cheng & Andy Wu, 2021. "Board design and governance failures at peer firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1909-1938, October.
    9. Ken Y. Chen & Jian Zhou, 2007. "Audit Committee, Board Characteristics, and Auditor Switch Decisions by Andersen's Clients," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 1085-1117, December.
    10. Akbar, Saeed & Kharabsheh, Buthiena & Poletti-Hughes, Jannine & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali, 2017. "Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 101-110.
    11. Brogi, Marina & Lagasio, Valentina, 2022. "Better safe than sorry. Bank corporate governance, risk-taking, and performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    12. Dah, Mustafa A., 2025. "Refreshing boards: Countering CEO entrenchment," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Luminita Enache & Antonio Parbonetti & Anup Srivastava, 2020. "Are all outside directors created equal with respect to firm disclosure policy?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 541-577, August.
    14. Andrew Shipilov & Yeonsin Ahn & Henrich Greve & Tim Rowley, 2024. "The impact of governance practices on firm outcomes: a machine-learning exploration," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 13(2), pages 45-64, June.
    15. Hernández-Atienza, Fernando & Rodríguez-Sanz, Juan Antonio & Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando, 2024. "The pathways of board diversity in European contexts: Exploring the influence of director types on firm performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    16. Amin, Abu & Mollah, Sabur & Kamal, Syed & Zhao, Yang & Simsek, Rasim, 2024. "Independent directors’ connectedness and bank risk-taking," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Etienne Redor, 2016. "Board attributes and shareholder wealth in mergers and acquisitions: a survey of the literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 789-821, December.
    18. He, Liyu & He, Rong & Evans, Elaine, 2020. "Board influence on a firm’s long-term success: Australian evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    19. Lerong He & Rong Yang, 2014. "Does Industry Regulation Matter? New Evidence on Audit Committees and Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(4), pages 573-589, September.
    20. Sunaina Kanojia & Shasta Gupta, 2023. "Bankruptcy in Indian context: perspectives from corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(2), pages 505-545, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:42:y:2021:i:11:p:2162-2191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.