IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v56y2019i6p1138-1193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board Committees in Corporate Governance: A Cross‐Disciplinary Review and Agenda for the Future

Author

Listed:
  • Kalin D. Kolev
  • David B. Wangrow
  • Vincent L. Barker
  • Donald J. Schepker

Abstract

The importance of board committees – specialized subgroups that exist to perform many of the board's most critical functions, such as setting executive compensation, identifying potential board members, and overseeing financial reporting – has grown over time due to increased legal requirements and greater complexity of the environment in which firms operate. This has resulted in a large body of work examining board committees across the accounting, finance, and management disciplines. However, this research has developed rather independently within each discipline, preventing scholars and practitioners from developing a comprehensive understanding of board committees. To address this issue, we conduct a comprehensive review of the literature that: 1) summarizes and synthesizes antecedents and outcomes associated with board committees in publicly‐traded firms in English common law countries; and 2) offers a critical analysis of existing research, providing recommendations for advancements and new directions in board committee research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalin D. Kolev & David B. Wangrow & Vincent L. Barker & Donald J. Schepker, 2019. "Board Committees in Corporate Governance: A Cross‐Disciplinary Review and Agenda for the Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1138-1193, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:56:y:2019:i:6:p:1138-1193
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12444
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Urbano & Andreu Turro & Mike Wright & Shaker Zahra, 2022. "Corporate entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1541-1565, December.
    2. Ding, Bin Yan & Wei, Feng, 2023. "Overlapping membership between risk management committee and audit committee and bank risk-taking: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Bolourian, Soudabeh & Alinaghian, Leila & Angus, Andrew, 2023. "Exploring the role of board-level corporate social responsibility committees in corporate social responsibility performance: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Fabel, Oliver & Mináriková, Dana & Hopp, Christian, 2022. "Differences and similarities in executive hiring decisions of family and non-family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2).
    5. Henrique Castro Martins & Cristiano Machado Costa, 2020. "Does control concentration affect board busyness? International evidence," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 821-850, September.
    6. Hanen Khemakhem & Paulina Arroyo & Julio Montecinos, 2023. "Gender diversity on board committees and ESG disclosure: evidence from Canada," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1397-1422, December.
    7. Gorshunov, Mikhail A. & Armenakis, Achilles A. & Harris, Stanley G. & Walker, H. Jack, 2021. "Quad-qualified audit committee director: Implications for monitoring and reducing financial corruption," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Chris GROSE & Dimitrios KOUFOPOULOS & Ioannis GKLIATIS & Konstantinos ATHANASIADIS & Michail FYGKIORIS, 2022. "Board characteristics and board committees in the Greek corporate governance framework," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13(4), pages 400-417, January.
    9. Spenser M. Essman & Donald J. Schepker & Anthony J. Nyberg & Caitlin Ray, 2021. "Signaling a successor? A theoretical and empirical analysis of the executive compensation‐chief executive officer succession relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 185-201, January.
    10. Mauricio Marrone & Sascha Lemke & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2022. "Entity linking systems for literature reviews," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3857-3878, July.
    11. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    12. Ginesti, Gianluca & Campa, Domenico & Spano’, Rosanna & Allini, Alessandra & Maffei, Marco, 2023. "The role of CSR committee characteristics on R&D investments," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    13. Shelby L. Gai & J. Yo‐Jud Cheng & Andy Wu, 2021. "Board design and governance failures at peer firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1909-1938, October.
    14. Karen Schnatterly & Felipe Calvano & John P. Berns & Chaoqun Deng, 2021. "The effects of board expertise‐risk misalignment and subsequent strategic board reconfiguration on firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(11), pages 2162-2191, November.
    15. Francesca Gennari, 2019. "How to Lead the Board of Directors to a Sustainable Development of Business with the CSR Committees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Oliveira, Fabio & Kakabadse, Nada & Khan, Nadeem, 2022. "Board engagement with digital technologies: A resource dependence framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 804-818.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:56:y:2019:i:6:p:1138-1193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.