IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v42y2021i1p185-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signaling a successor? A theoretical and empirical analysis of the executive compensation‐chief executive officer succession relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Spenser M. Essman
  • Donald J. Schepker
  • Anthony J. Nyberg
  • Caitlin Ray

Abstract

Research Summary Extant research rarely explores the relationship between executive compensation and chief executive officer (CEO) succession planning, despite practitioner claims that executive pay disparities indicate succession planning (in)effectiveness. Leveraging signaling theory, we use 830 succession events from 2010 to 2017 to show that pay disparity between the CEO and the highest paid non‐CEO executive is positively related to the likelihood of outside CEO succession. Thus, boards need to be aware of the implications of possible unintentional signals sent via executive compensation decisions. We do not find evidence of an interactive effect when compensation and CEO succession are co‐managed using linking pin directors—directors with compensation and CEO succession responsibilities—but supplemental analyses suggest a positive main effect of linking pin directors on the likelihood of inside CEO succession. Managerial Summary Powerful watchdog agencies assert that high pay differences between a firm's CEO and its next highest paid executive (CEO–HPE pay disparity) indicate succession planning challenges. This assertion has profound implications for stakeholders, but evidence supporting it is unclear. Our study examines the relationship between CEO–HPE pay disparity and the board's choice of an outside CEO, an indicator of ineffective succession planning. We find evidence that higher pay disparity signals an increased likelihood of choosing an outside CEO successor. We also find that boards who co‐manage compensation and succession may be more likely to hire an inside CEO successor. Our findings suggest that boards need to understand how compensation decisions may be inadvertently signaling future CEO succession choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Spenser M. Essman & Donald J. Schepker & Anthony J. Nyberg & Caitlin Ray, 2021. "Signaling a successor? A theoretical and empirical analysis of the executive compensation‐chief executive officer succession relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 185-201, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:42:y:2021:i:1:p:185-201
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.3219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3219
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.3219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward J. Zajac, 1990. "Ceo selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 217-230, March.
    2. James W. Fredrickson & Alison Davis‐Blake & WM. Gerard Sanders, 2010. "Sharing the wealth: social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO's top team," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(10), pages 1031-1053, October.
    3. Pamela Brandes & Ravi Dharwadkar & Sanghyun Suh, 2016. "I know something you don't know!: The role of linking pin directors in monitoring and incentive alignment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 964-981, May.
    4. Kalin D. Kolev & David B. Wangrow & Vincent L. Barker & Donald J. Schepker, 2019. "Board Committees in Corporate Governance: A Cross‐Disciplinary Review and Agenda for the Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1138-1193, September.
    5. Jason W. Ridge & Federico Aime & Margaret A. White, 2015. "When much more of a difference makes a difference: Social comparison and tournaments in the CEO's top team," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 618-636, April.
    6. Wei Shen & Albert A. Cannella,, 2003. "Will succession planning increase shareholder wealth? evidence from investor reactions to relay CEO successions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 191-198, February.
    7. Phyllis A. Siegel & Donald C. Hambrick, 2005. "Pay Disparities Within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High-Technology Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 259-274, June.
    8. Sudip Datta & Mai Iskandar-Datta, 2014. "Upper-echelon executive human capital and compensation: Generalist vs specialist skills," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1853-1866, December.
    9. Timothy J. Quigley & Adam J. Wowak & Craig Crossland, 2020. "Board Predictive Accuracy in Executive Selection Decisions: How Do Initial Board Perceptions of CEO Quality Correspond with Subsequent CEO Career Performance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 720-741, May.
    10. Yan Zhang, 2008. "Information asymmetry and the dismissal of newly appointed CEOs: an empirical investigation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 859-872, August.
    11. Michael Spence, 1973. "Job Market Signaling," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 87(3), pages 355-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gnekpe, Christian & Jimenez, Alfredo, 2023. "Smoke signal: When firms' patent strategy and local patent protection system affect equity stakes in cross-border acquisitions," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    2. Deore, Aishwarrya & Mahlendorf, Matthias D. & Wu, Fan, 2023. "CEOs' structural power, prestige power, and target ratcheting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hailiang Zou & Yunfeng Lu & Guoyou Qi, 2023. "Does Pay Disparity within Top Management Teams Lead to Bribery Activity? The Moderation of Demographic Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Alessandro Minichilli & Mattias Nordqvist & Guido Corbetta & Mario Daniele Amore, 2014. "CEO Succession Mechanisms, Organizational Context, and Performance: A Socio-Emotional Wealth Perspective on Family-Controlled Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7), pages 1153-1179, November.
    3. Chen, Yi-Min & Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Yang, Yung-Kai & Chen, Wei-Hua, 2016. "CEO succession in family firms: Stewardship perspective in the pre-succession context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5111-5116.
    4. Maria Rouziou, 2019. "The contingent value of pay inequalities in sales organizations: integrating literatures in economics, management, and psychology," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 184-204, December.
    5. Claudine Gartenberg & Julie Wulf, 2020. "Competition and Pay Inequality Within and Between Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5925-5943, December.
    6. Sam Garg & Qiang (John) Li & Jason D. Shaw, 2018. "Undervaluation of directors in the board hierarchy: Impact on turnover of directors (and CEOs) in newly public firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 429-457, February.
    7. Dehlen, Tobias & Zellweger, Thomas & Kammerlander, Nadine & Halter, Frank, 2014. "The role of information asymmetry in the choice of entrepreneurial exit routes," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 193-209.
    8. Kwon, Shin Hyoung & Kim, Joongseo & Yim, Hyunsoon (Sean), 2023. "Looking far or close: The explanatory role of myopic management in the relationship between CEO-TMT power disparity and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Chung, Richard Yiu-Ming & DeVaro, Jed & Fung, Scott, 2024. "Do Big Inequalities in Executive Pay Hurt Firm Performance?," IZA Discussion Papers 17346, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Jaroenjitrkam, Anutchanat & Mihaylov, George & Yu, Chia‐Feng (Jeffrey) & Zurbruegg, Ralf, 2023. "Pulling together by paying together: The effect of product market competition on TMT incentive dispersion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    11. Federico Aime & Aaron D. Hill & Jason W. Ridge, 2020. "Looking for respect? How prior TMT social comparisons affect executives' new TMT engagements," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2185-2199, December.
    12. Kevin B. Hendricks & Manpreet Hora & Vinod R. Singhal, 2015. "An Empirical Investigation on the Appointments of Supply Chain and Operations Management Executives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1562-1583, July.
    13. Nicola Breugst & Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2020. "When is Effort Contagious in New Venture Management Teams? Understanding the Contingencies of Social Motivation Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(8), pages 1556-1588, December.
    14. Mary J. Benner & Todd Zenger, 2016. "The Lemons Problem in Markets for Strategy," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 71-89, June.
    15. Jongjaroenkamol, Prasart & Laux, Volker, 2017. "Insider versus outsider CEOs, executive compensation, and accounting manipulation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 253-261.
    16. Xin Liu, 2023. "Fear to lose? An analysis of CEO successors’ decision-making regarding R&D intensity based on behavioral agency theory," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 403-430, February.
    17. Masatoshi Kato & Yuji Honjo, 2020. "CEO Succession and New-Firm Performance: Does Successor Origin Matter?," Discussion Paper Series 213, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    18. Henrique Castro Martins & Cristiano Machado Costa, 2020. "Does control concentration affect board busyness? International evidence," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 821-850, September.
    19. Baik, Bok & Evans, John H. & Kim, Kyonghee & Yanadori, Yoshio, 2016. "White collar incentives," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 34-49.
    20. Chang Gue Lim & Sang‐Youn Lee & Jinseon Seo, 2020. "The signaling effect of ambidexterity of social enterprises on acquiring financial resources in South Korea," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(4), pages 633-647, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:42:y:2021:i:1:p:185-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.