IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v21y2014i6p516-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Correlates of Gender Integration in Science

Author

Listed:
  • Cindy L. Cain
  • Erin Leahey

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Cindy L. Cain & Erin Leahey, 2014. "Cultural Correlates of Gender Integration in Science," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(6), pages 516-530, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:21:y:2014:i:6:p:516-530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/gwao.12052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerhard Sonnert & Mary Frank Fox & Kristen Adkins, 2007. "Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Effects of Faculty, Fields, and Institutions Over Time," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1333-1356, December.
    2. Alison McCook, 2013. "Women in biotechnology: Barred from the boardroom," Nature, Nature, vol. 495(7439), pages 25-27, March.
    3. Ronald S. Burt, 1998. "The Gender Of Social Capital," Rationality and Society, , vol. 10(1), pages 5-46, February.
    4. Mary Fox & Carol Colatrella, 2006. "Participation, Performance, and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering: What is at Issue and Why," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 377-386, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McGuire, Erin & Rietveld, Anne M. & Crump, Amanda & Leeuwis, Cees, 2022. "Anticipating gender impacts in scaling innovations for agriculture: Insights from the literature," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    2. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7bha6m6829el8e94uqmo4qp6c is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Makini Beck & Jillian Cadwell & Anne Kern & Ke Wu & Maniphone Dickerson & Melinda Howard, 2022. "Critical feminist analysis of STEM mentoring programs: A meta‐synthesis of the existing literature," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 167-187, January.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-01087572 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7bha6m6829el8e94uqmo4qp6c is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Anne Revillard, 2014. "Les inégalités de genre dans l’enseignement supérieur et la recherche," Working Papers hal-01087572, HAL.
    7. Marco Pautasso, 2015. "The Italian University Habilitation and the Challenge of Increasing the Representation of Women in Academia," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Colette Fagan & Nina Teasdale, 2021. "Women Professors across STEMM and Non-STEMM Disciplines: Navigating Gendered Spaces and Playing the Academic Game," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(4), pages 774-792, August.
    9. Anne Revillard, 2014. "Les inégalités de genre dans l’enseignement supérieur et la recherche," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01087572, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0223568 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Birton J Cowden & Jintong Tang, 2017. "Gender Differences And Entrepreneurial Munificence: The Pursuit Of Innovative New Ventures," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(01), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Bowles, Hannah Riley, 2012. "Claiming Authority: How Women Explain their Ascent to Top Business Leadership Positions," Scholarly Articles 9830355, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Carlos Lozares & Joan Verd & Irene Cruz & Oriol Barranco, 2014. "Homophily and heterophily in personal networks. From mutual acquaintance to relationship intensity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2657-2670, September.
    5. Gonzalez-Brambila, Claudia & Veloso, Francisco M., 2007. "The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1035-1051, September.
    6. Adam M. Kleinbaum & Toby E. Stuart & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1316-1336, October.
    7. Nathalie Greenan & Emmanuelle Walkowiak, 2005. "Informatique, organisation du travail et interactions sociales," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 387(1), pages 35-63.
    8. Buhai, I. Sebastian & van der Leij, Marco J., 2023. "A Social Network Analysis of Occupational Segregation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Laurence Saglietto & Cécile Cézanne & Delphine David, 2020. "Research On Structural Holes: An Assessment On Measurement Issues," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 572-593, July.
    10. Lalanne, Marie & Seabright, Paul, 2011. "The Old Boy Network: Gender Differences in the Impact of Social Networks on Remuneration in Top Executive Jobs," TSE Working Papers 11-259, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    11. Florence Villesèche & Evis Sinani, 2023. "From Presence to Influence: Gender, Nationality and Network Centrality of Corporate Directors," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 486-504, April.
    12. Lalanne, Marie & Seabright, Paul, 2016. "The old boy network: The impact of professional networks on remuneration in top executive jobs," SAFE Working Paper Series 123, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    13. Bowles, Hannah Riley, 2012. "Claiming Authority: How Women Explain Their Ascent to Top Business Leadership Positions," Working Paper Series rwp12-047, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    14. Oriol Barranco & Carlos Lozares & Dafne Muntanyola-Saura, 2019. "Heterophily in social groups formation: a social network analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 599-619, March.
    15. Bibek Bhattacharya & Ipsu Khadka & Dalhia Mani, 2022. "Shaking Up (and Keeping Intact) the Old Boys’ Network: The Impact of the Mandatory Gender Quota on the Board of Directors in India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 763-778, May.
    16. Pascal Brassier, 2008. "Les négociateurs commerciaux et les réseaux sociaux : de l'usage intuitif à l'outil de gestion," Post-Print hal-02382951, HAL.
    17. Rhoten, Diana & Pfirman, Stephanie, 2007. "Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 56-75, February.
    18. Kjersten Bunker Whittington & Molly M. King & Isabella Cingolani, 2024. "Structure, status, and span: gender differences in co-authorship networks across 16 region-subject pairs (2009–2013)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 147-179, January.
    19. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2ir572v5ci9srbd2th8a6399e2 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2ir572v5ci9srbd2th8a6399e2 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Emily Chamlee-Wright & Justus Myers, 2008. "Discovery and social learning in non-priced environments: An Austrian view of social network theory," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 151-166, September.
    22. Gorji, Yasaman & Carney, Michael & Prakash, Rajshree, 2020. "Indirect nepotism: Network sponsorship, social capital and career performance in show business families," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3).
    23. Marieke Brink & Yvonne Benschop, 2014. "Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 460-492, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:21:y:2014:i:6:p:516-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.