IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i8p10185-10206.html

How Stakeholder Engagement Drives Environmental Innovation to Mitigate Climate Change: Evidence From European Small Caps

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Netti
  • Marika Intenza
  • Christian Favino
  • Chiara Pia Saraò

Abstract

Climate change poses several challenges for ecosystems and business operations, prompting scholars, practitioners and policymakers to seek novel solutions. This paper focused on a sample of listed companies on the STOXX Europe Small 200 index and examined the interplay between stakeholder engagement and environmental innovation across 9 years (i.e., 2015–2023). By single‐mediator models through ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and path analysis, we ran a mediation analysis to assess the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) committee and the environmental management team as mediators of the baseline relationship. Drawing upon an Integrated Theoretical Framework, combining Stakeholder Theory (SKT), Knowledge‐Based View (KBV) and Stewardship Theory (SWT), our empirical evidence showed that increased stakeholder engagement is positively associated with higher levels of environmental innovation activities, possibly suggesting that small‐cap firms mitigate climate risks by further engaging with their stakeholders. Still, the mediating factors at both the management and board levels positively mediate the aforementioned relationship. Overall, our findings contribute to the broader academic debate on climate change management, providing novel insights to understand how companies can navigate climate change‐related risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Netti & Marika Intenza & Christian Favino & Chiara Pia Saraò, 2025. "How Stakeholder Engagement Drives Environmental Innovation to Mitigate Climate Change: Evidence From European Small Caps," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10185-10206, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10185-10206
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristel Buysse & Alain Verbeke, 2003. "Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 453-470, May.
    2. Ozdemir, Sena & Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe, Juan & Sena, Vania & Gupta, Suraksha, 2023. "Stakeholder diversity and collaborative innovation: Integrating the resource-based view with stakeholder theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    4. Costantini, Valeria & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2012. "On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 132-153.
    5. Cedric Dawkins, 2014. "The Principle of Good Faith: Toward Substantive Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 283-295, May.
    6. Haibin Yang & Gregory G. Dess & James A. Robins, 2019. "Does entrepreneurial orientation always pay off? The role of resource mobilization within and across organizations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 565-591, September.
    7. Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella & Santilli, Gianluca, 2023. "Environmental engagement and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the European banking industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Carolin E. Pflueger & Su Wang, 2015. "A robust test for weak instruments in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 15(1), pages 216-225, March.
    9. Robert M. Grant, 1996. "Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 375-387, August.
    10. Dulacha Barako & Alistair Brown, 2008. "Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(4), pages 309-324, November.
    11. Richard Welford, 2002. "Globalization, corporate social responsibility and human rights," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, March.
    12. Sara Saggese & Fabrizia Sarto & Rosaria Romano & Riccardo Viganò, 2023. "Implications of directors’ education for audit fees: does the audit committee matter?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(6), pages 901-926, June.
    13. Wiesmeth, Hans, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement for environmental innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 310-320.
    14. Charles W. L. Hill & Thomas M. Jones, 1992. "Stakeholder‐Agency Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 131-154, March.
    15. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    16. Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & M. Belén Lozano & Miguel Vivas, 2021. "The impact of board cultural diversity on a firm's commitment toward the sustainability issues of emerging countries: The mediating effect of a CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 675-685, March.
    17. Giacomo Manetti, 2011. "The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical evidence and critical points," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 110-122, March.
    18. Nicolai J. Foss, 1996. "Knowledge-Based Approaches to the Theory of the Firm: Some Critical Comments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(5), pages 470-476, October.
    19. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2020. "Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 333-377, December.
    20. Chris Mason & John Simmons, 2014. "Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 77-86, January.
    21. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay, 2023. "How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 551-569, January.
    22. Richard Welford, 1992. "Linking quality and the environment: A strategy for the implementation of environmental management systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 25-34, March.
    23. Garard, Jennifer & Kowarsch, Martin, 2017. "If at first you don’t succeed: Evaluating stakeholder engagement in global environmental assessments," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 235-243.
    24. Federica Doni & Antonio Corvino & Silvio Bianchi Martini, 2021. "Corporate governance model, stakeholder engagement and social issues evidence from European oil and gas industry," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 636-662, September.
    25. Jing Lu & Irene M. Herremans, 2019. "Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1449-1464, November.
    26. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.
    27. García-Sánchez, Isabel-María & Aibar-Guzmán, Beatriz & Raimo, Nicola & Vitolla, Filippo & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2024. "Climate governance, growth opportunities, and innovation in addressing climate change: Empirical evidence from emerging countries," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    28. Jianhua Zhang & Muhammad Noman & Adnan Ali & Zeeshan Ali & Shanza Qayyum & Afaq Ahmed Khan & Mehkar Sherwani, 2025. "A Moderated Mediation Model Linking Stakeholder Integration to Green Innovation: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3764-3780, March.
    29. Melinda Muth & Lex Donaldson, 1998. "Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 5-28, January.
    30. Pucci, Tommaso & Casprini, Elena & Galati, Antonino & Zanni, Lorenzo, 2020. "The virtuous cycle of stakeholder engagement in developing a sustainability culture: Salcheto winery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 364-376.
    31. Ching-Hsun Chang, 2011. "The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 361-370, December.
    32. Bendell, Bari L. & Nesij Huvaj, M., 2020. "Does stakeholder engagement through corporate social and environmental behaviors affect innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 685-696.
    33. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    34. Wang, Yanxia & Shen, Tao & Chen, Yang & Carmeli, Abraham, 2021. "CEO environmentally responsible leadership and firm environmental innovation: A socio-psychological perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 327-340.
    35. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yufei Wang & Xiufan Zhang & Yan Wang & Xueli Chen & Malin Song, 2024. "The road to sustainable development: Results of the differentiated choice of corporate environmental strategy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 2990-3003, August.
    2. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    4. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    5. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Pereira, Vijay & Nair, Asha KS. & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar, 2025. "Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Ying Guo & Lifang Wang, 2022. "Environmental Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Environmental Innovation and Stakeholder Pressure," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, February.
    9. Dong, Yuting & Sun, Ziyuan & Zhou, Yiqiang, 2026. "Not all voices are equal: stakeholder environmental pressures and corporate green innovation strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, 2018. "How do Independent Directors Behave with Respect to Sustainability Disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 609-627, July.
    11. Anne-Laure P. Winkler & Jill A. Brown & David L. Finegold, 2019. "Employees as Conduits for Effective Stakeholder Engagement: An Example from B Corporations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 913-936, December.
    12. Chotia, Varun & Cheng, Yue & Agarwal, Reeti & Vishnoi, Sushant Kumar, 2024. "AI-enabled Green Business Strategy: Path to carbon neutrality via environmental performance and green process innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Francesca Collevecchio & Valerio Temperini & Virginia Barba-Sanchez & Angel Meseguer-Martinez, 2025. "Sustainable Governance: Board Sustainability Experience and the Interplay with Board Age for Firm Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 371-389, March.
    14. Yina Zhang & Wu Zhao & Haiman Liu, 2024. "Effect of Digital Transformation in Sports Companies on Green Innovation: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-31, September.
    15. Vincent Tawiah & Reon Matemane & Babajide Oyewo & Tesfaye T. Lemma, 2024. "Saving the environment with indigenous directors: Evidence from Africa," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2445-2461, March.
    16. Luning Tong & Maowei Chen, 2024. "The Impact of Female Director Background on the ESG Performance of Chinese Technology Firms: A Moderating Effect Based on Risk Appetite," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Zhongju Liao & Xiufan Zhang & Yufei Wang, 2025. "How religious norms influence firms’ environmental innovation? Evidence from China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(1), pages 1271-1291, December.
    18. Liao, Zhongju & Chen, Jie & Chen, Xueli & Song, Malin, 2024. "Digital platform capability, environmental innovation quality, and firms’ competitive advantage: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    19. Huang, Yi-Chun & Chen, Chih Ta, 2022. "Exploring institutional pressures, firm green slack, green product innovation and green new product success: Evidence from Taiwan's high-tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Misra, Shekhar & Mishra, Saurabh, 2026. "Environmental, social, and governance performances, media sentiments, and shareholder wealth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10185-10206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.