IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i3p3764-3780.html

A Moderated Mediation Model Linking Stakeholder Integration to Green Innovation: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jianhua Zhang
  • Muhammad Noman
  • Adnan Ali
  • Zeeshan Ali
  • Shanza Qayyum
  • Afaq Ahmed Khan
  • Mehkar Sherwani

Abstract

Despite extensive discourse on the significant role of stakeholder integration in sustainability and firm performance, its impact on promoting green innovation (GI) remains underdeveloped in current environmental management literature. To address this gap, our study adopts stakeholder theory to develop a moderated mediation model that examines how and under what conditions stakeholder integration influences GI. Using data from 306 Pakistani‐listed manufacturing firms and employing partial least squares path modeling, our findings confirm the positive impact of stakeholder integration on GI and highlight the partial mediating role of organizational learning capability (OLC). Additionally, the results indicate that environmental scanning moderates the relationship between stakeholder integration and OLC. Overall, these insights contribute to business strategy and environmental management literature by illuminating the critical role of stakeholder integration in driving GI and elucidating the underlying mechanisms involving OLC and environmental scanning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianhua Zhang & Muhammad Noman & Adnan Ali & Zeeshan Ali & Shanza Qayyum & Afaq Ahmed Khan & Mehkar Sherwani, 2025. "A Moderated Mediation Model Linking Stakeholder Integration to Green Innovation: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3764-3780, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3764-3780
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge Ferreira & Sofia Cardim & Arnaldo Coelho, 2021. "Dynamic Capabilities and Mediating Effects of Innovation on the Competitive Advantage and Firm’s Performance: the Moderating Role of Organizational Learning Capability," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 620-644, June.
    2. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    3. Ozdemir, Sena & Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe, Juan & Sena, Vania & Gupta, Suraksha, 2023. "Stakeholder diversity and collaborative innovation: Integrating the resource-based view with stakeholder theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Mahmoud M. Migdadi, 2019. "Organizational learning capability, innovation and organizational performance," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 151-172, November.
    5. Mirna Kordab & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2020. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Social capital and firms' environmental innovations: The moderating role of environmental scanning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1493-1501, December.
    7. Costa, Federica & Lispi, Leonardo & Staudacher, Alberto Portioli & Rossini, Matteo & Kundu, Kaustav & Cifone, Fabiana Dafne, 2019. "How to foster Sustainable Continuous Improvement: A cause-effect relations map of Lean soft practices," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    8. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li & Nan Zhou & Chenting Su, 2008. "Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: evidence from China," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9), pages 985-1000, September.
    9. Afzaal Ali & Guo Xiaoling & Adnan Ali & Mehkar Sherwani & Farhan Muhammad Muneeb, 2019. "Customer motivations for sustainable consumption: Investigating the drivers of purchase behavior for a green‐luxury car," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 833-846, July.
    10. Paul E. Bierly & Fariborz Damanpour & Michael D. Santoro, 2009. "The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 481-509, May.
    11. Defeng Yang & Wei Jiang & Weihong Zhao, 2019. "Proactive environmental strategy, innovation capability, and stakeholder integration capability: A mediation analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1534-1547, December.
    12. Kalaivani Jayaraman & Sreenivasan Jayashree & Magiswary Dorasamy, 2023. "The Effects of Green Innovations in Organizations: Influence of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    14. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Mario Minoja, 2012. "Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 67-82, August.
    16. Linda Holbeche, 2019. "Designing sustainably agile and resilient organizations," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 668-677, September.
    17. Jianming Zhang & Gongqian Liang & Taiwen Feng & Chunlin Yuan & Wenbo Jiang, 2020. "Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 39-53, January.
    18. Dima Jamali, 2008. "A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 213-231, September.
    19. Putzhammer, Moritz & Slangen, Arjen & Puck, Jonas & Lindner, Thomas, 2020. "Multinational firms' pace of expansion within host countries: How high rates of pro-market reform hamper the local exploitation of foreign expansion knowledge," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(1).
    20. Chao Wang & Shushan Zhang & Xiue Zhang, 2022. "How to Embrace Sustainable Performance via Green Learning Orientation: A Moderated Mediating Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    21. Ching-Hsun Chang, 2011. "The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 361-370, December.
    22. Miyana Yoshino & Benjamin Sadlek & Masaru Yarime & Adnan Ali, 2023. "Knowledge absorption pathways for eco-innovation: an empirical analysis of small and medium-sized enterprises in the European Union," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 426-453, July.
    23. Do, Hoa & Budhwar, Pawan & Shipton, Helen & Nguyen, Hai-Dang & Nguyen, Bach, 2022. "Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning and environmental dynamism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 808-821.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Netti & Marika Intenza & Christian Favino & Chiara Pia Saraò, 2025. "How Stakeholder Engagement Drives Environmental Innovation to Mitigate Climate Change: Evidence From European Small Caps," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10185-10206, December.
    2. Adnan Ali & Qian Yang & Xu Jiang, 2026. "Promoting Sustainable Development: Green Strategies and Firm Performance in Emerging Economies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 719-735, January.
    3. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2026. "Digital twin fosters social entrepreneurship for smart sustainable infrastructure: mediating role of environmental management accounting practices," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Zeeshan Ali & Zhaohui Qin & Tatbeeq Raza‐Ullah & Afzaal Ali & Mehkar Sherwani, 2025. "Leading the Way to Greening: Aligning Leadership Styles and Market Learning for Radical and Incremental Green Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8571-8589, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pereira, Vijay & Nair, Asha KS. & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar, 2025. "Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Sher Jahan Khan & Amandeep Dhir & Vinit Parida & Armando Papa, 2021. "Past, present, and future of green product innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4081-4106, December.
    3. Adnan Ali & Qian Yang & Xu Jiang, 2026. "Promoting Sustainable Development: Green Strategies and Firm Performance in Emerging Economies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 719-735, January.
    4. Licheng Yang & Shijie Song & Chunlin Liu, 2024. "Green signals: The impact of environmental protection support policies on firms' green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3258-3278, May.
    5. Mei Han & Guoliang Feng & Xinyue Liu, 2025. "Optimizing Nonspatial Proximity to Increase Green Technological Innovation in Manufacturing," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    6. Chao Hung Wang, 2020. "An environmental perspective extends market orientation: Green innovation sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3123-3134, December.
    7. Ying Guo, 2023. "External Knowledge Acquisition and Green Innovation in Chinese Firms: Unveiling the Impact of Green Dynamic Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    8. Manjot Singh Bhatia, 2021. "Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2845-2857, November.
    9. Hussain Bux & Zhe Zhang & Adnan Ali, 2026. "Corporate social responsibility adoption for achieving economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 4545-4575, February.
    10. An, Suxia & Gu, Yu & Pan, Lu & Yu, Ying, 2024. "Supply chain digitalization and firms' green innovation: Evidence from a pilot program," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 828-846.
    11. Yalin Jiang & Wei Cai & Yu Wang, 2024. "Change starts within: does managerial ability matter to green innovation?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Chun Xue & Juanru Wang, 2024. "Proactive boundary‐spanning search, organizational resilience, and radical green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1834-1852, March.
    13. Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz & J. Alberto Aragon-Correa & Andrew G. Earle, 2022. "Innovating for Good in Opportunistic Contexts: The Case for Firms’ Environmental Divergence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 705-721, April.
    14. Wunhong Su & Chun Guo & Xiaobao Song, 2022. "Media coverage, Environment Protection Law and environmental research and development: evidence from the Chinese-listed firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6953-6983, May.
    15. Chuyao Deng & Wenliang Peng & Zhenjiang Dou & Qidi Zhang, 2024. "Environmental Background Directors and ESG Performance: A Perspective on Green Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Marco-Lajara, B. & Úbeda-García, M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. & Manresa-Marhuenda, E., 2023. "The impact of international experience on firm economic performance. The double mediating effect of green knowledge acquisition & eco-innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Abdullah F. Alnaim & Nadia Abdelhamid Abdelmegeed Abdelwahed & Bahadur Ali Soomro, 2022. "Environmental Challenges and Green Innovation Strategy: A Vigorous Development of Greener Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Chun Xue & Juanru Wang & Rui Torres de Oliveira, 2026. "Digital Capability and Radical Green Innovation: The Role of Organizational Resilience and Environmental Dynamism," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 694-713, January.
    20. Ali Kemal Çeli̇k & Tayfun Yildiz & Zafer Aykanat & Siamak Kazemzadeh, 2025. "Green Innovation Adoption in Turkish and Iranian SMEs: The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities and the Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1824-1859, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3764-3780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.