IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaec/v39y2025i4p498-528.html

Gender diversity and firm performance: A multi‐level analysis of Japanese firms

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroko Okajima
  • Shigeharu Okajima
  • Tomoka Ito
  • Atsushi Morimoto

Abstract

This study analyzes how gender diversity at the board, managerial, and employee levels relates to firm performance in Japan, using panel data from 311 listed companies (2006–2017). We apply instrumental variable estimation to address endogeneity. Across all levels and models, we find no statistically significant association between female representation and performance (measured by Tobin's Q and profit margin). These insignificant results may reflect structural or cultural barriers that limit the impact of diversity. The findings suggest that increasing female representation alone may be insufficient without broader organizational reform and institutional support mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroko Okajima & Shigeharu Okajima & Tomoka Ito & Atsushi Morimoto, 2025. "Gender diversity and firm performance: A multi‐level analysis of Japanese firms," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 39(4), pages 498-528, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaec:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:498-528
    DOI: 10.1111/asej.70003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.70003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/asej.70003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaec:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:498-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.